[openBVE] SG : Circle Line [ACW: DBG to MRM]
-
Welcome! This topic is all about the Circle Line ACW Direction.
This project is strictly copyrighted by Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Singapore License.
The list of the developers of the Circle Line ACW & the Alstom Metropolis C830:
Circle Line ACW:
Developer: Bryanwee1 (Bryan)
Co-Developer: SBS7322BAlstom Metropolis C830:
Developer: SBS7322B
Co-Developer: Bryanwee1 (Bryan)New CCL website:
Notes:
1. The distance is not that accurate in the first release. Although the distance is not that correct, the slopes are 95% accurate. And, version 1 only includes Dhoby Ghaut to Paya Lebar.And after the first release, I will release version 2 in a later date (Maybe a few months). In version 2,
- Distance will be at lease 96% accurate
- Extension to Tai Seng ( Not coming in version 1)
- Converging and Diverging of tracks ( Not coming in verson 1)
And in version 3, (Estimated Release Date: Depending on when the CCL stage 4 & 5 will be opened)
- Extension to Harbourfront (not coming in
version 2 & 1)
- Station objects will be added (not coming in version 2 & 1)
Updates:
- Route skeleton completed
- PSDs destos added
- PSDs edited
- PSD pilliers added
- Added clear announcements
- RATIS Modified in to 3-D RATIS
- Dhoby Ghaut crossover end walls added
- Mountbatten and Dakota completed
- Paya Lebar Completed.
Latest updates will be reported in this list.
(This update list will only list the updates in Version 1. After Version 1 is released, this update list will be emptied and it will be replaced with the updates of Version 2)Releases:
---------There are currently no releases for the Circle Line (Anti-Clockwise)----------
Scheduled developer's version release date: November 2010
Scheduled public release: December 2010
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Bryan Wee
Developer, openBVE Singapore, Circle Line -
DOUBLE POST DELETED
-
DOUBLE POST DELECTED
-
DOUBLE POST DELECTED
-
Promenade is quite a challenge to me as it has the "no power and rail" siding, the track which leads to the dead end and the psds are on the left instead on the right. There is still another challenge that is the Paya Lebar Station.
-
Why no one posting on my thread? I feel so lonely
-
POST DELECTED
-
Originally posted by Bryanwee1:
Since the NSL and EWL has their own website, I think I shall make one for the CCL. Agree?
Use Google Sites (http://sites.google.com/). To standardise things.
-
Originally posted by Bryanwee1:
Promenade is quite a challenge to me as it has the "no power and rail" siding, the track which leads to the dead end and the psds are on the left instead on the right. There is still another challenge that is the Paya Lebar Station.
That one, ok de, since the 3rd rail (power) is usually included in the rail file (Your tracks)
I can suggest that either you do a Promenade with a CGL style (Willis' CGL got it by using the station tunnel walls integrated along with other "station objects", which actually, if you have read my object library that is modified from his, you would realize that this station object I am referring about is floor.csv . Otherwise, you can simply put a nothing file (Blank object file) and use it as if it is a rail. (And your wall commands can be used as well!!)
-
Originally posted by Bryanwee1:
Some Information (copied from the off-topic crapbox):
I have completed Nicoll Highway Station! So, maybe next month I will release the developer's version.
1. The developer's version may not include the announcements because I haven't record them yet. But don't worry, the actural release will include the announcements.
2. The distance is not that accurate in the first release. Although the distance is not that correct, the slopes are 95% accurate. And, version 1 only includes Dhoby Ghaut to Stadium.
And after the first release, I will release version 2 in a later date (Maybe a few months). In version 2,
- Distance will be at lease 96% accurate
- Tunnel walls at the crossover at Dhoby Ghaut will be added ( Not coming in version 1)
- Extension to Marymount / Tai Seng ( Not coming in version 1)
- Converging and Diverging of tracks ( not coming in verson 1)
And in version 3, (will be released in 2011)
- Extension to Harbourfront (not coming in version 2)
- Station objects will be added (not coming in version 2)
So, in release 2, you want me to extend to Tai Seng or Marymount? PM me with your answers. (If you chooses Tai Seng, I will release the route earlier. But if you chooses Marymount, you will have to wait longer.)
Wow! In total, I have only 3 tasks to complete in order to develop the CCL!
My suggestion is, CCL, you extend it to 5 phases, just like how real life CCL is
By the way, it is not having just 3 tasks will do. In the end, you would need to do a lot in the station objects, and how to get them is an issue due to crowd.
Although, I can say, CCL is easier becoz the station length is shorter, you still need a train to run it. Can you imagine a C151 or C751B running CCL!!!?? That one ---- ah.... very difficult de. So dont think so easy as if 1 week can do half to 1 stage of CCL.
-
Oh I see, I will try that when I complete Stadium Station. Anyway, Thanks for the info.
-
@Samuel Lee:
The psds i want is the same a the Raffles Place Test Suite (24 doors for each platform. Almost the same exept for the destoes and the door closing indicator light). This is what i want. Do you understand me? Or you want me to explain to you in a much more easier concept?
-
Ok. I support you to terminate at Tai Seng. Work onto Marymount if you want to. However, I'd rather you make until Tai Seng first.
-
I'd rather you make MacPherson before making Tai Seng and then heading on to Bartley, before Serangoon, then Lorong Chuan, next following Bishan and finally Marymount. However, before MacPherson, Tai Seng, Bartley, Serangoon, Lorong Chuan, Bishan and Marymount, you need to remember Paya Lebar, Dakota, Mountbatten, Stadium, Nicoll Highway, Promenade, Esplanade, Bras Basah and finally Dhoby Ghaut, before starting developing MacPherson, Tai Seng, Bartley, Serangoon, Lorong Chuan, Bishan and Marymount.
-
Originally posted by SBS7322B:
Ok. I support you to terminate at Tai Seng. Work onto Marymount if you want to. However, I'd rather you make until Tai Seng first.
Thank You!
-
Originally posted by Bryanwee1:
@Samuel Lee:
The psds i want is the same a the Raffles Place Test Suite (24 doors for each platform. Almost the same exept for the destoes and the door closing indicator light). This is what i want. Do you understand me? Or you want me to explain to you in a much more easier concept?
I of course can understand. But my concern is it requires heavy change if the C830 turns out not to be the same length gap as C151.
-
Originally posted by Samuel Lee:
I of course can understand. But my concern is it requires heavy change if the C830 turns out not to be the same length gap as C151.
We will discuss this in a later date when I find a soulution. By the way, who is gonna develope the C830? I have deleted my previous C830 long time ago
-
Originally posted by Bryanwee1:
We will discuss this in a later date when I find a soulution. By the way, who is gonna develope the C830? I have deleted my previous C830 long time ago
Restore your computer to an earlier date.
-
For the C830 issue. You can still use our trains as template. Like this, route objects will be compatible with CCL. So all objects will be interchangeable with NSL/EWL and CCL. I can modify into 3 car C751B....... XD
-
Originally posted by Bryanwee1:
We will discuss this in a later date when I find a soulution. By the way, who is gonna develope the C830? I have deleted my previous C830 long time ago
In the case that you do not have a system restore (I turned it off), then ho seh lo. Coz, nobody is gonna to develop it. (Even if I got an extra time, I would go develop C651, whose developer had given up on it due to school work's commitment.)
-
Originally posted by Samuel Lee:
My suggestion is, CCL, you extend it to 5 phases, just like how real life CCL is
By the way, it is not having just 3 tasks will do. In the end, you would need to do a lot in the station objects, and how to get them is an issue due to crowd.
Although, I can say, CCL is easier becoz the station length is shorter, you still need a train to run it. Can you imagine a C151 or C751B running CCL!!!?? That one ---- ah.... very difficult de. So dont think so easy as if 1 week can do half to 1 stage of CCL.
Station Objects will be added in Version 3. This morning I used the C751B to test my route. LOL! And the psds I am now using are the EWL's psds (6-cars - C151, C651, C751B).
-
Originally posted by SBS7322B:
For the C830 issue. You can still use our trains as template. Like this, route objects will be compatible with CCL. So all objects will be interchangeable with NSL/EWL and CCL. I can modify into 3 car C751B....... XD
3-car C751B? That's great if you could help.
-
Originally posted by Bryanwee1:
Station Objects will be added in Version 3. This morning I used the C751B to test my route. LOL! And the psds I am now using are the EWL's psds (6-cars - C151, C651, C751B).
Tell you what, go to the floor.csv, and you can roughly see the -11X+.XX (Negative 110 + meters). That is how long it extend backwards. (The history of FHPSD comes where Willis install the first 4, and only 4 PSD in his CGA, so I do it simple way which just extend it backwards). You will need to divide into 2 (Approximate), which gives you like 50X or so, that is where you need. Look for the direction, and check for the 12nd PSD and you should have a hint or so.
Regarding 3 cars C751B (or any other trains), it is possible.
Go to the specific train folder, find the extension.cfg
And you will see something like this
[Exterior]
0 = cars\3237.ANIMATED
[Car0]
Length = 23.5
[Exterior]
1 = cars\1237.ANIMATED
[Car1]
Length = 23
[Exterior]
2 = cars\2237.ANIMATED
[Car2]
Length = 23
[Exterior]
3 = cars\2238.ANIMATED
[Car3]
Length = 23
[Exterior]
4 = cars\1238.ANIMATED
[Car4]
Length = 23
[Exterior]
5 = cars\3238.ANIMATED
[Car5]
Length = 23.5
Each [Exterior] means the exterior object (we name it by train car number) and [CarX] refers to the car number, starting from 0 (Any programming language will tell you that index starts from 0).See the difference. This is why certain train car between the gaps got difference and I have to research and trial and error until it fits, like now. All number are in meters. (Obviously, you are going to keep Car0, Car1 and Car2.)
-
mmm........I can give it a try tomorrow and I will reply you with an answer whether can or cannot.
-
OFF TOPIC: Wow, am I the youngest developer? I am only 10 years old leh.