Originally posted by SBS7484P:This.
Your attitude in addressing others and what you said in your latest post - they do not concur.
You say he is knowledgeable - do you treat him with the due respect?
He mentions its from experience and I can tell that even though you're not straight out denying his answer, you're subtly calling shenanigans.
What is up with people and attitude these days.
Question asked, give thanks to the one who answered it.
If he answered it well, thank him.
If it wasn't answered well, suck it up and move on.
Be professional.
I'm trolling you because I don't like your attitude up here.
You weren't like this previously.
God knows what has gotten over you.
Originally posted by Fire Engine:You think link so easy to find ah? U find urself la. Want to ask for other's opinion and yet u??
Originally posted by SBS7484P:No need for links.
It's common sense. Go measure it yourself if you want proof.
A CPU is limited to a certain power envelope.
That is usually the TDP of the CPU itself. Unless you overclock, it will not exceed the manufacturer's rated TDP, no matter what OS you use.
It's just a matter of how demanding the programs are. The more demanding, the more CPU cycles it 'consumes' and therefore a larger amount of heat is produced. When there's more heat, of course energy is needed to create this heat and thus more energy is used in demanding programs.
Originally posted by SBS7484P:No need for links.
It's common sense. Go measure it yourself if you want proof.
A CPU is limited to a certain power envelope.
That is usually the TDP of the CPU itself. Unless you overclock, it will not exceed the manufacturer's rated TDP, no matter what OS you use.
It's just a matter of how demanding the programs are. The more demanding, the more CPU cycles it 'consumes' and therefore a larger amount of heat is produced. When there's more heat, of course energy is needed to create this heat and thus more energy is used in demanding programs.
I'm at wrong for probably using the wrong tone causing you to misunderstand.
But, you can't be removed from the blame too. If you think i was aiming him, you could have asked me why i did that. But instead you came attacking me straight, and i seriously felt unhappy about receiving this comment from you for no reason.
Ok ok, stop the flame from now onwards.
I have removed all posts.
And SBS7484P, if you see this, i suggest you do the same.
Regarding to your personal attack, I have given you the benefit of the doubt that it was due to the misunderstanding.
But if it happens again, no more chance as you have been told.
I don't mean to be rude, but that post was directed at you.
If you notice, I did not initiate any name calling.
I admit I was being a dick to join in the name calling but you started it first.
Change your attitude and we look forward to better co-operation in future.
64 should be the future. can't deny. but seeems the transition will take a while. support for 32bit is still very much active. though hardware seems to transit faster, some software are a little slow on moving to 64 though. weell just my opinion. 64 opens up more opportunities and is the future can;t be denied. fast or slow i personally feel 32bit has just reached its limit.
Originally posted by SBS7484P:I don't mean to be rude, but that post was directed at you.
If you notice, I did not initiate any name calling.
I admit I was being a dick to join in the name calling but you started it first.
Change your attitude and we look forward to better co-operation in future.
I meant the common sense thing...that was an insult to my intelligence, whether you noticed it or not.
I apologise for that then, if you found it offensive.
I am now on windows 7 64bit, there is not much diff on 32 and 64 just that there is one stupid IE which run on 64bit and cannot support the latest flash
if you using many freeware well i don;t know some freeware got 64bit version or not?
Originally posted by Doraemonboi:I am now on windows 7 64bit, there is not much diff on 32 and 64 just that there is one stupid IE which run on 64bit and cannot support the latest flash
Well, please blame the stupid Atobe, eh no sorry, Adobe for not releasing a Flash X64 one.
Thanks to Wow64, Freeware even no 64bit version, you can still run but cannot handle one that requires 4GB RAM in any particular application (Separately yes, so you will come into trouble if an single instance of application wants more than 4GB of RAM which is unlikely in most cases but one 32bit application uses 3GB RAM and the other uses 2GB of RAM still can).