the best stock research analyst in singapore?
-
which of these research companies have the most accurate research?
anyone knows their website so i can check out their research reports to see what stocks on SGX are good to buy?
Asia
AM Securities
Bahana Securities
BOCI (Bank of China)
BPI Securities
Bualuang
Capital Securities
CIMB
CLSA
Core Pacific Yamaichi
DAIWA
DBS Vickers (S'pore)
Dongwon Securities
Finansa Securities GK Goh
Good Morning Shinhan
HSBC Asia
ING
KGI (Taiwan)
KGI, Korea
KGI (Thailand)
Kim Eng
LG
Mandiri Sekuritas
Nomura (Malaysia)
Nomura (Singapore)
Nomura, HK & Tw OSK Research
Phatra Securities
Philippines Equity Partners
Phillips Securities Research
Primasia, Taiwan
RHB Securities
Seamico, Thailand
Sinopac HK
Sinopac TW
South China research
Sun Hung Kai
UOB Kay Hian
Yuanta
from http://www.aqresearch.com/htm_docs/analysis_who.htm -
YOu need to pay to read their research. For free research, go to SGX website and register an account with them. To access those broking houses research reports, you need to open an account with them.
www.sgx.com -
Hello....
What Im going to say will be hard for you to accept, but please do spend time to think about it.
Stock research or stock analysis is useless.
The only utility you can derive from them is that they will miss their forecasts for sure. Therefore don't take any positions as they told you or recommend you.
Why are they useless?
Because any analysis or research in this field will involve quantification and forecasting. It is not possible to quantify all variables in stock market dynamics and use a model to numerically compute and then forecast the future. It is not only misleading but dangerously so. It will lead you to disaster, as you will be like a pilot reading a malfunctiong altimeter.
For further conviction, you can do some reading on your own on the subject matter, or try it out yourself. -
I wouldnt say they are useless. The job of a stock analyst is just to express an opinion on their views of the share which they are researching.Originally posted by Li Ka Shing:Hello....
What Im going to say will be hard for you to accept, but please do spend time to think about it.
Stock research or stock analysis is useless.
The only utility you can derive from them is that they will miss their forecasts for sure. Therefore don't take any positions as they told you or recommend you.
Why are they useless?
Because any analysis or research in this field will involve quantification and forecasting. It is not possible to quantify all variables in stock market dynamics and use a model to numerically compute and then forecast the future. It is not only misleading but dangerously so. It will lead you to disaster, as you will be like a pilot reading a malfunctiong altimeter.
For further conviction, you can do some reading on your own on the subject matter, or try it out yourself.
Whether the stock goes up or down, nobody can tell. Stock analyst usually back up their recommendations with fundamental data and personal interpretations. Therfore, what looks good to one may not look good to others.
As usual, one must always exercise their personal judgement before investing in a stock. So dont blame the stock analyst if you follow them blindly. -
everytime everybody gives the same advise : "you gotta do your own research", "gotta read up yourself"
i am not a professional, and i am sure many of those ppl who dispense that piece of advise are no better. and when i ask them to comment whether the stock would bring any profits, most of them try to sound intelligent by saying "this stock is risky". DUH
i understand that nobody has a crystal ball and cannot be 100% right all the time. but i am sure it is possible to reduce risk and turn the odds in profitable favor
since research reports are done by professionals with facts and figures to go along with it, wouldnt it be a good idea to act upon their advise if they have consistantly made accurate predictions.
or does it ultimately boils down to Heng vs Sway? -
double post
-
I believe you heard about the number 1 rule when it comes to investing. It simply is DO NOT HAVE A HOLY GRAIL MENTALITY TOWARDS STOCKS. There is no such thing as a 100% accuracy when it comes to investing. Even Warren Buffet accuracy is not even 100%.Originally posted by HanHao:everytime everybody gives the same advise : "you gotta do your own research", "gotta read up yourself"
i am not a professional, and i am sure many of those ppl who dispense that piece of advise are no better. and when i ask them to comment whether the stock would bring any profits, most of them try to sound intelligent by saying "this stock is risky". DUH
i understand that nobody has a crystal ball and cannot be 100% right all the time. but i am sure it is possible to reduce risk and turn the odds in profitable favor
since research reports are done by professionals with facts and figures to go along with it, wouldnt it be a good idea to act upon their advise if they have consistantly made accurate predictions.
or does it ultimately boils down to Heng vs Sway?
The purpose of research reports is to give the reader a basic idea on what the researcher feels of the share based on fundamental data. In order to increase the odds of you being a winner, SOUND and personal judgement must be exercised. Ultimately, you are responsible for your own investments.
Heng vs sway probably occurs in situation when there is a market depression or a financial crisis. -
Yes if you are able to find a researcher with good track record and has made consistently accurate predictions, I believe you can use him. I agree with this. But when following him, allow some room for unexpected events outside his modelling.Originally posted by HanHao:...
since research reports are done by professionals with facts and figures to go along with it, wouldnt it be a good idea to act upon their advise if they have consistantly made accurate predictions.
or does it ultimately boils down to Heng vs Sway? -
ok, great