Train Disruption bet. AMK & YIS
-
No surprise, hard worked systems sure breakdown one day. Not like London and Tokyo have 365 days smooth running... We just had our day today loh...
-
few months ago, i boarded from khatib to yck, i was surprised that no NB train came along this stretch, it was a major breakdown, NSL needs overhaul
-
NSL is e oldest mrt line le..
-
perhaps u can walk home
-
I think we need a new train operator from overseas to take over the current.
-
Originally posted by Airbus330Captain:
I think we need a new train operator from overseas to take over the current.
... later FT worst...
-
Originally posted by PWNED32:
... later FT worst...
It depends.
If MTR Corp or a kabushikigaisha runs, there's hope.
If it's any transport giant based in the US or UK, good luck......!
-
Personally, when I was in HK, I think that their MTR is better than our MRT.
-
Originally posted by sgbuses:
It depends.
If MTR Corp or a kabushikigaisha runs, there's hope.
If it's any transport giant based in the US or UK, good luck......!
True true....
-
it was reported on zaobao as well...
-
be-coz of this... NSL is losing aloot of trains
-
shin min li bao also got report ytd. MRT disruption spreads burnt smell, people force the train door open and "escape" as the title.
-
i was wondeing is it 131/132???
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
pics here http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/showthread.ph…
anyway no bridging services lor. 851, 852 & 853 bunch & packed like sardines. wat is this!
all semua SMRT's svs wat
-
if we've more land
I think having a bus rapid transit is better than having a MRT system
1 train rosak entire line gone case -
Originally posted by TIB1224Y:
No surprise, hard worked systems sure breakdown one day. Not like London and Tokyo have 365 days smooth running... We just had our day today loh...
agreed...
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
if we've more land
I think having a bus rapid transit is better than having a MRT system
1 train rosak entire line gone case
rail is still the better option. efficient and cleaner.
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
rail is still the better option. efficient and cleaner.
yeah labut you see many places where they've land, they've gone for BRT instead.
-
double post
-
they also can't afford the capital investment... esp places where cars and highways are cheap.
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
they also can’t afford the capital investment… esp places where cars and highways are cheap.
dun forget back in 80s, we weren't really able to afford for a big MRT project eitherwe aren't tat well off like now
wait wait... isn't e price of land and road propotional to how intensely e land is used?
-
but the population has grown since the 80's :lol: without MRT it'll be worse :lol: we could that's why we have MRT now, but it's whether we can sink this money down, take the risk and see the benefits.... but when you can't get to & out of where you stay, your land value also dip ma :lol:
-
Originally posted by ^tamago^:
but the population has grown since the 80’s
without MRT it’ll be worse we could that’s why we have MRT now, but it’s whether we can sink this money down, take the risk and see the benefits….
but when you can’t get to & out of where you stay, your land value also dip ma
yeah lait's a game tat played off. I remembered back then my dad was telling me, we're lucky to get it done w/ relatively low bids
funding was quite an issue, dun forget tat time our fighter jets were still either 2nd hand or from remaining surplus spare parts left in wharehouse ppl dun want