the reason they said was because Marina Bay was required for the trains to turn around.Originally posted by Gordonator:the authorities claims that they'll make a loss because the ridership will be very low.
that's strange, if they can operate the Marina station, don't understand why they cannot operate Buangkok station. don't tell me Marina station has more ridership than Buangkok.
Woodbridge?Originally posted by 105090:hmm.. i already forsee Buangkok is going to be white elephant for SBS.
reason? look at bus number 119, 136. Residents complain.. under political pressure, SBS complied. Then after a few months, its back to square one cos the complaining residents didnt used the services "fully" and maximised usage.
Same as Buangkok in future. wait and see.
Dont forget it opened due to political reasons, and not economic reasons ah?
btw, did u all know what was the intended name for the area called "Buangkok"?
Hint: The previous name of Gerald Drive
Sv 115, 119 and 136 are under poltical influenceOriginally posted by 105090:hmm.. i already forsee Buangkok is going to be white elephant for SBS.
reason? look at bus number 119, 136. Residents complain.. under political pressure, SBS complied. Then after a few months, its back to square one cos the complaining residents didnt used the services "fully" and maximised usage.
Same as Buangkok in future. wait and see.
Dont forget it opened due to political reasons, and not economic reasons ah?
btw, did u all know what was the intended name for the area called "Buangkok"?
Hint: The previous name of Gerald Drive
if m not wrong.. theres also a Woodbridge (wine brand)Originally posted by iveco:Woodbridge?
BTW, the West Midland station on Perth's Eastern Suburbs line has been renamed "Woodbridge", in memory of one colonial WA governor's estate nearby.
Svc 136 is for the students of Upper Serangoon school.Originally posted by sbst275:Sv 115, 119 and 136 are under poltical influence
Sv 136 night frequency now 20 mins
political part is mainly extension to Punggol partOriginally posted by iveco:Svc 136 is for the students of Upper Serangoon school.
yes.Originally posted by charlize:Does that mean after the elections, they close the station?
If that is the case, the ruling party would lose all credibility.Originally posted by sinicker:yes.
yes! WP rules! Even tho' their manifesto kinda suck.Originally posted by iveco:If that is the case, the ruling party would lose all credibility.
sorry. i read the news abt 3hrs before and decided to bring it up for discussion here. i anyhow hentam the 1386 figure! haha!Originally posted by 105090:Its 1386 passengers/ transactions.
means yeah.. about 700 ppl used it.
See... residents complain and complain.. 2nd day of operations already super negative.. insult to SBS!
maybe ppl using buangkok to pay surcharge!
700 ppl in 18 hours, means on average 40-50 ppl/ hour.. or 2 people from every train alights in both directions.
Buangkok was up due to poor housing planningOriginally posted by Medicated Oil:Some Body have to prove that Some One is RIGHT about keeping the station close.
The best way is through providing figures.
The passenger rate will not make the company lost money cos they can shamelessly ask for more fare increase by citing the white elephant station as a REASON.
Did any one from the bus company complain when they are making more than 100% profit and 0% increase in bus frequency last year ???