Dude, I bought both!Originally posted by ConScan:Hey dscans, I got Priscilla ... you go get the other one.![]()
Yah I hope so too. Maybe you can write in and demand it.Originally posted by dscans:Both feature 2 page of glossy A4 photos of the cover ladies, suitable for framing. Donno if it's only for their 5th anniversary or a regular thing.
If that's going to be a regular feature, I'm seriously considering subscribing!![]()
as long as u are willing to share the pics with us, we will support u.Originally posted by dscans:If NewMan keeps up this level of quality, I definitely will be subscribing!![]()
Yes ah! This month's Newman also got.Originally posted by dscans:Both feature 2 page of glossy A4 photos of the cover ladies, suitable for framing. Donno if it's only for their 5th anniversary or a regular thing.
If that's going to be a regular feature, I'm seriously considering subscribing!![]()
I am beginning to agree with you....the gals that NewMan feature look a lot nicer! The girls on FHM and Maxim vary by a lot, quality wise. Sorry that I was a little blunt....no offense to any ladiesOriginally posted by BÃ¥seline:Wow... thanks guys!
Maybe it's jus my age.. I tends to prefer the gals over at NewMan than FHM or Maxim. Perhaps it leans towards the office lady direction.![]()
It's not really the scanner, but the retouching of the scan that is the trickOriginally posted by tinydot:nice pics there...may i know the scanner dat u using?
I must say your retouching skills rather good. It is not easy to hv decent scans from magazine bcos of the moire patterns. Unlike photos, the resulted printed materials from magazines, newspaper are made up of tiny dots on closer look.Originally posted by dscans:It's not really the scanner, but the retouching of the scan that is the trick
Any reasonably modern flatbed scanner can do a good job of scanning.