Follow the success of filming Band of Brothers, Tom Hanks and Steven SP. came up with mini series the Pacific.
preview....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e99B80crU3E
Originally posted by Mospeada:Not bad. But episode 3 is abit boring
I think in any movie you need to built character it is not a documentary...also please remember this is a depiction of 3 person account of their experiences during WWII.
where can i watch this miniseries online?
I still prefer Band of Brothers.
Originally posted by Joolead:where can i watch this miniseries online?
ha you should not be asking this question online....
Originally posted by sand king:I still prefer Band of Brothers.
I think that is because the movie leap into Gaudalcanal immediately without really introduce the characters and audience have yet to built relationship with the characters and people start dying its kind of confuse to put names on faces.
You got to read the book and understand the sequence of the campaign. Than put the battles in the movie into perspective of where, when and how it happen in respect to the entire War Zone in Gaudalcanal.....Because In this series the film maker only filmed the important battles. It is what the 3 person account and not explain the entire war. So goes the rest of the mini series you kinda of have read the entire campaign.
Maybe this is what Tom Hank and Steven wants to educate the audience. Spark questions...go read up..both film makers don't just do this without intend. They also have a tendency to go off Tangent....
Originally posted by Arapahoe:
ha you should not be asking this question online....
okies..so let me rephrase it . any streaming for this ?
Originally posted by Arapahoe:
I think that is because the movie leap into Gaudalcanal immediately without really introduce the characters and audience have yet to built relationship with the characters and people start dying its kind of confuse to put names on faces.You got to read the book and understand the sequence of the campaign. Than put the battles in the movie into perspective of where, when and how it happen in respect to the entire War Zone in Gaudalcanal.....Because In this series the film maker only filmed the important battles. It is what the 3 person account and not explain the entire war. So goes the rest of the mini series you kinda of have read the entire campaign.
Maybe this is what Tom Hank and Steven wants to educate the audience. Spark questions...go read up..both film makers don't just do this without intend. They also have a tendency to go off Tangent....
so what is the title of the book may be i go library to borrow.
Originally posted by Joolead:so what is the title of the book may be i go library to borrow.
Intro background of the series...
It is a series about the american soldiers who fought in the Pacific the whole 9 yard from Guadalcanal to Okinawa base on the account of 3 soldiers. Below are the thoughts and discussion with Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg... and the crews for making of "The Pacific".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94et1Bb53mw
If you are interested in the stories there are 2 books that the show was based on...
Eugene B. Sledge who wrote a book title "With the Old Breed"
this is an interesting interview with Eugene Sledge.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-idSRLjg9A
Robert Leckie wrote "Helmet for my pillow"
and 3rd person john basilone
i sometime wonder why MY and SG govt and jointly with the Brit. to do film on The fall of MY and SG? There are enough material and resources to actually do up a really good film.
Originally posted by Arapahoe:
Intro background of the series...
It is a series about the american soldiers who fought in the Pacific the whole 9 yard from Guadalcanal to Okinawa base on the account of 3 soldiers. Below are the thoughts and discussion with Tom Hanks and Steven Spielberg... and the crews for making of "The Pacific".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94et1Bb53mw
If you are interested in the stories there are 2 books that the show was based on...
Eugene B. Sledge who wrote a book title "With the Old Breed"
this is an interesting interview with Eugene Sledge.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-idSRLjg9A
Robert Leckie wrote "Helmet for my pillow"
and 3rd person john basilone
thank for the intro but do a check at the library . kind of disappointed
I love band of brother very much... watch it more than 5 times but never get bored. I like the way how the characters are bonded just like the movie tittle stated...brothers...
Looking forward to the pacific although I can feel the disappointment is there if I compared it with BOB :)
Originally posted by SpeedStar:I love band of brother very much... watch it more than 5 times but never get bored. I like the way how the characters are bonded just like the movie tittle stated...brothers...
Looking forward to the pacific although I can feel the disappointment is there if I compared it with BOB :)
If you enjoyed the series band of brother than you should read Stephen ambrose World war II collect of books.
Originally posted by Arapahoe:
I think that is because the movie leap into Gaudalcanal immediately without really introduce the characters and audience have yet to built relationship with the characters and people start dying its kind of confuse to put names on faces.You got to read the book and understand the sequence of the campaign. Than put the battles in the movie into perspective of where, when and how it happen in respect to the entire War Zone in Gaudalcanal.....Because In this series the film maker only filmed the important battles. It is what the 3 person account and not explain the entire war. So goes the rest of the mini series you kinda of have read the entire campaign.
Maybe this is what Tom Hank and Steven wants to educate the audience. Spark questions...go read up..both film makers don't just do this without intend. They also have a tendency to go off Tangent....
I'll watch Band of Brothers any day, but The Pacific somehow bores me.
Originally posted by sand king:I'll watch Band of Brothers any day, but The Pacific somehow bores me.
Part 1 to part 4 is about Leckie and john basilone....
I supposed they are protraying individual experience and the pyschological toll it took on these guys.
part 1 n 2 has alot of closed up night time shooting and that may have affected how the scene on screen also considered in tropical jungle it is difficult for audience to guage the battle. Unlike band of brothers there was a lot of daytime fighting and open area shooting.
I think will have to wait till Eugene Sledge experience.
PS: I wonder if john basilone would returned for the following battle.
if i am not wrong esp 5 will be telecast on the 11th of April this coming Sunday night over at the US.
Arapahoe pal i have found the resource over the net to watch the whole esp free. no doubt the quantity is a little bit bad and still consider watchable.
I do agree with band of brother have lot of day light fighting at euro side where else the pacific is in the night. It displaced the true actually of topical rain forest and asia. for those have serve their 2 and a half year in the army will know.
what i find of the other book at my campus library is thiswritten by robert leckie
below is the brief summary of each esp
Originally posted by Joolead:if i am not wrong esp 5 will be telecast on the 11th of April this coming Sunday night over at the US.
Arapahoe pal i have found the resource over the net to watch the whole esp free. no doubt the quantity is a little bit bad and still consider watchable.
I do agree with band of brother have lot of day light fighting at euro side where else the pacific is in the night. It displaced the true actually of topical rain forest and asia. for those have serve their 2 and a half year in the army will know.
glad to read that you are finally streaming.
I also think that it also happen that the Japanese choose the cover of darkness to conduct their assult...this is to avoid the daytime bombing by the Americans airforce. So that is why the critical battle scene happen to be at night.
*waits for DVD release with bated breath*
loved band of brothers. the best mini series ever! "captain, we salute the rank, not the man!"
..............dun sound like much of a war....
japs had mostly 80% armed with bolt actioned outdated slower non auto loading rifles and with no submachineguns or much practical weapons!their hand grenades even had to be knocked over their helmets to ensure that it really exploded somewhat!the officers sidearm pistol looked like a badly designed plastic capgun that was inaccurate and jammed often......the weapons on jap sides were a joke!
the americans had 60% M1 rifles which loads itself automatically , thompson submachineguns and other better and faster machineguns.their grenades dun need to be knocked on anything once pin is out and thrown at target.their colt auto pistol made in 1911 never jammed and is often used up to this day.
the germans had almost the same variation as the americans but still lost anyway.
the americans with superior weapons fighting with an ancient japanese army with outdated weapons in the jungle sounds odd......
fighting a war like that would be like fighting the war in iraq where coalition forces would be armed with modern automatic weapons while the mujahideens armed only with old ww2 heavy clunky weapons that cant even fire on automatic.
american versus jap army sounds like an unfair fight where the japs would lose due to bad weapons.