it sure is. it was poorly received.Originally posted by lolxzxz:so does it mean the movie Hulk is a failure?
harnor.Originally posted by Gordonator:it sure is. it was poorly received.
the original movie earned $24.3 million on opening day in the US and $62.1 million on opening weekend. however it sees a 69.7% drop during the second weekend. With a final North American gross of $132.2 million it became the largest opener to fail to earn $150 million.
it only manage to take in $113.1 million overseas as well.
i was quite disappointed in the movie. feels too serious. hopefully the sequel do better.
"seldom" is a more correct word to useOriginally posted by allentyb:
sequels are never better than the first one
then again, the fist movie was never that good, too much jumping around already
tell that to Lord of the Rings, Spider-Man, and Jason Bourne.Originally posted by allentyb:
sequels are never better than the first one
then again, the fist movie was never that good, too much jumping around already
a nazi Hulk sounds goodOriginally posted by ditzy:Edward Norton is not suited for the incredible hulk. I don't want a bruce banner that sounds as squeaky as a mouse.
jumping around is one thing. what i really don't like is the poodle fighting scenes. i was like WTF!? and too much fighting in the dark.Originally posted by allentyb:then again, the fist movie was never that good, too much jumping around already