Mininum Diploma nowadays or higher
-
To be getting a decent job with the related benefits and salary
Decent as in you can "Tahan" till ur next pay and be able to cope with ur monthly expenses like hp internet bills, inssurance preniums and etc
Any views 
-
in this case, no masters no talk
-
unless you're in sales or running some business, you need a dip at least to earn a decent living
-
No pHD No Talk!!
-
I wonder does a dip in MDIS can find a better job?
-
people always think that must go university get a degree then can get a good job with good pay. with so many degree holders out there, are there really enough supply and demands for them?
some jobs don't need a degree for them. for example a diploma holder and a degree holder apply for the same job, both are equally capable for the job, the diploma holder asks for $1700 a month, while the degree holder asks for $2200. who do u think the boss will hire?
point is, be comfortable of u have. a diploma student can also get a good job with good pay the same as a degree holder, it depends on finding the right job and with a little bit of luck. -
Well my dad empasis the need for a degree while a manager friend reccomend a master since specialisation means that i am harder to replace
-
mininum is not ITE mei??
cause now gov promoting ITE ma...
so diploma is ok...
-
it doesn't matters on how much one earns, it depends on how much one saves.
for instances A earns $3000 a month, but A smokes, drinks, goes to pub, materialistic, takes cab to work everyday and hardly save any money each month.
on the other hand, B earns $1700 each month but is thrifty and after spending on his monthly expenses and personal needs, make an effort to save $500 each month.
so in the end, who is the one better off? -
agree....Originally posted by Gordonator:it doesn't matters on how much one earns, it depends on how much one saves.
for instances A earns $3000 a month, but A smokes, drinks, goes to pub, materialistic, takes cab to work everyday and hardly save any money each month.
on the other hand, B earns $1700 each month but is thrifty and after spending on his monthly expenses and personal needs, make an effort to save $500 each month.
so in the end, who is the one better off? -
but you see, that's the problemOriginally posted by Gordonator:it doesn't matters on how much one earns, it depends on how much one saves.
for instances A earns $3000 a month, but A smokes, drinks, goes to pub, materialistic, takes cab to work everyday and hardly save any money each month.
on the other hand, B earns $1700 each month but is thrifty and after spending on his monthly expenses and personal needs, make an effort to save $500 each month.
so in the end, who is the one better off?
A can afford to be lavish, B cant -
true. but life is more than lavishness. it is important to save money for rainy days, one will never know when shit will happen whereby the money will come in handy.Originally posted by mystiv:but you see, that's the problem
A can afford to be lavish, B cant
my suggestion to A, quit smoking, drinking and cut down on those taxi rides. -
hmm...Originally posted by Gordonator:it doesn't matters on how much one earns, it depends on how much one saves.
for instances A earns $3000 a month, but A smokes, drinks, goes to pub, materialistic, takes cab to work everyday and hardly save any money each month.
on the other hand, B earns $1700 each month but is thrifty and after spending on his monthly expenses and personal needs, make an effort to save $500 each month.
so in the end, who is the one better off?
wat if A smokes, drinks, clubs, womanize this n that and saves $500 every month...
whereas B is thrify and just spend on his monthly expenses and personal needs and save $500 every month...
who has more fun...?