Police give conditional warning to my friend
-
men should also be protected justly when they are threatened by women at anytime according to their whims and fancies...
Men's Charter ought to be established
-
I am sure that poor chap was trembling in fear when he sent that lewd message to the lady
Oh my
-
do wrong thing never dio daiji still want to come and say law enforcers abuse authority.
got balls tell it to the police in the face don't act wu sey say they wrong.
get caught stealing things den come and say shop sell too expensive. duh.
-
You can refuse to accept the conditional warning and tell the CIO so. Give your reasons. I am sure the CIO will accept your rejection of the warning and go ahead and prosecute.
Warnings are give the offender a chance of a clean record, and save the court's time.
In fact less work for him, if he prosecutes, because his officers do all the work.
-
I don't understand the thread starter... he is given a chance and he is not happy... Wat did he hope for when he met the police ? If he really kanna prosecuted, the best thing he will ever get out of it is also just a warning. Or does he think he is not wrong at all for saying others is a prostitute ?
-
Originally posted by Daveteo:
1 of my friend sms a girl asking her for sex and that he is willing to pay. She make a police report for outrage of molesty.
For someone so dumb to sms this, he shouldn't complain about getting just a warning.
-
Originally posted by Daveteo:
1 of my friend sms a girl asking her for sex and that he is willing to pay. She make a police report for outrage of molesty.
After my friend went down to make a statement, 9 months later the police contact him to close the case.
The police give him a conditional warning that he is not allowed to commit any crime in the next 12 months or else they will charge him in court for the new case plus this outrage of molesty case.
It is the Chief Investigating Officer who issue the conditional warning. He seems to be a big shot in the police force because he have his own office and my friend saw alot of other police officers bringing in people to his office for him to give them warning.
My friend find this conditional warning to be very bullshit. Because it should be AGO who issue him the warning and not a what Chief Investigating Officer. The Chief Investigating Officer does not have the authority to issue a warning. Only AGO and the judge can give warning.
Moreover, my friend did not have any criminal offence in the past too. This is his 1st case with the police.
Is the Chief Investigating Officer abusing his authority to give unauthorised warning letters?
Your friend already committed an offence and he still thinks he deserved to be treated fairly?Can you ask him DID HE ALSO TREATED HIS VICTIM(THAT GIRL) FAIRLY?
If the answer is YES, then come and tell me and I'll go represent your friend for FREE.
Don't give me excuses like this is the first time your friend is committing an offence. Why don't you tell me this is the first time your friend is being CAUGHT for committing an offence?
Criminals and non-criminals alike, nowadays people think they are overly-educated and imagined they can get away with everything with their excuses.
Who asked your friend to go commit an offence? If he is brave enough to gamble with the law and commit an offence, then he should also be brave enough to accept his punishment.
Is he still a guy? Please ask him to go cut off his ku ku bird ok? Maybe then the judge will be lenient towards him.
-
Originally posted by Daveteo:
1 of my friend sms a girl asking her for sex and that he is willing to pay. She make a police report for outrage of molesty.
After my friend went down to make a statement, 9 months later the police contact him to close the case.
The police give him a conditional warning that he is not allowed to commit any crime in the next 12 months or else they will charge him in court for the new case plus this outrage of molesty case.
It is the Chief Investigating Officer who issue the conditional warning. He seems to be a big shot in the police force because he have his own office and my friend saw alot of other police officers bringing in people to his office for him to give them warning.
My friend find this conditional warning to be very bullshit. Because it should be AGO who issue him the warning and not a what Chief Investigating Officer. The Chief Investigating Officer does not have the authority to issue a warning. Only AGO and the judge can give warning.
Moreover, my friend did not have any criminal offence in the past too. This is his 1st case with the police.
Is the Chief Investigating Officer abusing his authority to give unauthorised warning letters?
This kind of case...IO can already...what Chief Investigating Officer...impress who?
The Attorney-General of Singapore leads AGC...ur AGO dunno from where.
-
Originally posted by Fcukpap:
men should also be protected justly when they are threatened by women at anytime according to their whims and fancies...
Men's Charter ought to be established
Seriously, I don't know what on earth is wrong with you.
This is an open-and-shut case of sexual harassment where the perpetrator (a male) got off with a light warning, and somehow you want to go off on a tangent and politicize the matter into the issue of male rights.
Ok lah, ok lah, this is all the PAP's fault, this is all the gahmen's fault, and the Fudgester is a PAP dog. That's what you want to hear, right?
-
Dave, are you the friend you mentioned?
-
Originally posted by fudgester:
Seriously, I don't know what on earth is wrong with you.
This is an open-and-shut case of sexual harassment where the perpetrator (a male) got off with a light warning, and somehow you want to go off on a tangent and politicize the matter into the issue of male rights.
Ok lah, ok lah, this is all the PAP's fault, this is all the gahmen's fault, and the Fudgester is a PAP dog. That's what you want to hear, right?
Imposing private personal problems on the posters. All he is doing is shoot shoot shoot without the intention to solve his problems.Result: we are reading his crap
-
Originally posted by fudgester:
Seriously, I don't know what on earth is wrong with you.
This is an open-and-shut case of sexual harassment where the perpetrator (a male) got off with a light warning, and somehow you want to go off on a tangent and politicize the matter into the issue of male rights.
Ok lah, ok lah, this is all the PAP's fault, this is all the gahmen's fault, and the Fudgester is a PAP dog. That's what you want to hear, right?
I think Singaporeans' stupidity is killing the country more than the elite gahmen
-
ask your friend to commit an offence now and you will know whether his warning is real or bullshit.
-
if it is bullshit than how? advice your friend to commit crime ah? dumbass.
-
VERY VERY SIMPLE QUESTION FOR YOU.
what do you want?
-
Originally posted by fudgester:
Yah, yah, yah.
Gahmen's fault that the fella tried to preposition a girl for paid sex.
PAP's fault that the fella committed an outrage of modesty.
Right?
ya la...ah lau...today whole day stomach pain, abit unwelling=PAP fault
last month got up late for work kena fark by my boss=PAP fault
last month me cycle beri fast kena knocked down by car door opening=PAP fault
tmr i whack 'aeroplane' until blood flow out then go hospital=PAP fault
yesterday got headache=PAP fault
last week a woman's soiled panties dropped on my head=PAP fault
last week's TOTO/4D tio jiat=PAP fault
i can't get my favourite PC game on stock=PAP fault
anything else to add TS?
-
Originally posted by Daveteo:
1 of my friend sms a girl asking her for sex and that he is willing to pay. She make a police report for outrage of molesty.
After my friend went down to make a statement, 9 months later the police contact him to close the case.
The police give him a conditional warning that he is not allowed to commit any crime in the next 12 months or else they will charge him in court for the new case plus this outrage of molesty case.
It is the Chief Investigating Officer who issue the conditional warning. He seems to be a big shot in the police force because he have his own office and my friend saw alot of other police officers bringing in people to his office for him to give them warning.
My friend find this conditional warning to be very bullshit. Because it should be AGO who issue him the warning and not a what Chief Investigating Officer. The Chief Investigating Officer does not have the authority to issue a warning. Only AGO and the judge can give warning.
Moreover, my friend did not have any criminal offence in the past too. This is his 1st case with the police.
Is the Chief Investigating Officer abusing his authority to give unauthorised warning letters?
AGC [and not AGO as you have stated] is the one that gives directions for the Police to act on. The Police consult AGC on possible ways to deal with cases, and once AGC give directions for the Police, the Police will then act accordingly. In this case, your friend was given a conditional warning simply because AGC has given the Police directions for this to be done. If AGC says to charge, then your friend would have been charged. AGC has the final say. Simple as that. Judges give sentences to accused persons, not warnings. AGC deals with the process of prosecution, not the final outcome [e.g. warning]. Get your facts right before you shoot your mouth off.
The fact that this is your friend's first case with the Police is exactly why he is not charged. Also the Chief Investigation Officer is one of the people authorized by AGC to administer, as well as give out, letters of warning.
All in all, tell your friend to be thankful and take this chance not to reoffend. Rest assured the next time he comes to adverse notice, he will not get another warning.