Looking at the posting of TS.
It is very obvious.
That TS friend has no case against the police.
And its very obvious. TS friend is in deeper trouble then TS led the whole lot of us here to believe.
And on another matter. TS finally shows that he got no credibility in police investigations, his friends story, or even his own story.
We are so lucky to be reading here, what a lot of so called 'heroes of the public' thinks and acted on their 'IQ'.
Police initialled or AGC initialed my backside........TS obviously live in a imaginery world.
Originally posted by 8800:1. How is he suppose to check the classification of the report. Cos he don't believe the policeman.
2. What I am saying is that tiggerific say that it is a AGC case that is why the police ask my friend down for investigation.
I am saying that police ask him down for investigation doesn't mean that it is AGC case as even for Magistrate case the police will still ask him down for investigation
3. That is if the victim wants to bring the case to the magistrate court. if not than it will just be liasion between police and victim.
4 That means if the victim and police decide not to pursue the case, they can don't inform AGC and there is no need to go to court
Get a lawyer.
And until you boys learn to pay the $$$ to a lawyer and learn from that lawyer what you or your friend really should or should no be doing.
You are fishing for answers to answer your imaginery scenerios.
~~
BTW, TS needs to learn to open mouth, takes out foot. Open wallet, close his mouth and his fingers for the good of his backside.
Originally posted by 8800:1. How is he suppose to check the classification of the report. Cos he don't believe the policeman.
2. What I am saying is that tiggerific say that it is a AGC case that is why the police ask my friend down for investigation.
I am saying that police ask him down for investigation doesn't mean that it is AGC case as even for Magistrate case the police will still ask him down for investigation
3. That is if the victim wants to bring the case to the magistrate court. if not than it will just be liasion between police and victim.
4 That means if the victim and police decide not to pursue the case, they can don't inform AGC and there is no need to go to court
1) to check the case classification, all he has to do is ask the IO. The IO has nothing to gain by lying to your friend. And if your friend doesn't believe the In-Charge case of the case classification, then tough: there will be nothing left to talk about really. It's like not believing your butcher when he says that the meat he sells you is real meat.
2) What I mentioned was then if your friend has been called down to assist in investigations, that means proceedings are already underway. What I would like for you to understand that in cases where offences are disclosed and the identity of perpetrators have been established, the Police will be working together with AGC on how to best proceed with the case. This means that the AGC already know that such a case, involving such people, exists. They have been alerted when the case file is opened, and they will similarly be alerted when investigations have been concluded. The Police will make recommendations; it is up to AGC for the final say.
3) Points three and four only apply if it is indeed a Magistrate's Complaint. But even then, the Magistrate can use his or her discretion to intervene and decide.
If it is a formal Police-initiated investigation, then the entire matter, by now, is out of the hands of the victim, and most certainly your friend's.
Hope this helps.
Originally posted by 8800:1. How is he suppose to check the classification of the report. Cos he don't believe the policeman.
2. What I am saying is that tiggerific say that it is a AGC case that is why the police ask my friend down for investigation.
I am saying that police ask him down for investigation doesn't mean that it is AGC case as even for Magistrate case the police will still ask him down for investigation
3. That is if the victim wants to bring the case to the magistrate court. if not than it will just be liasion between police and victim.
4 That means if the victim and police decide not to pursue the case, they can don't inform AGC and there is no need to go to court
A clone will not believe in policeman.
Originally posted by viciouskitty74:
Yes, this case can go to court.
Bo liao, then sit and wait to see how it works out lor.
Why you so gan cheong?
Maybe he is the one le, not his friend..
Originally posted by Q.C.Pak:A clone will not believe in policeman.
neither will stupid people I think. especially when it concerns something as straightforward as case classification.
Originally posted by skythewood:
He don't believe the policeman? Why people don't want to believe policeman? Only a CRIMINAL will not believe policeman, and think that they are out to get him. People who got robbed, raped, attacked, and so on all BELIEVE in police, that's why they go to them. THIEF, RAPIST, ROBBER, MURDERER, PEOPLE WHO INSULT THE MODESTY OF WOMEN, will think that the police is out to get them, and is SCARED that the truth will be known, and their screwed up thinking makes them distrust the police.
Because there are alot of policeman who abuse authority.
1 policeman went drinking with his friend. When his friend is drunk and started scolding the policeman, the moron policeman abuse his authority by arresting his friend and say want to charge him for making a public nuisance.
If policeman can do such things to their own friend, what else they can't do to the public whom they don't know
Originally posted by xunni:
Because there are alot of policeman who abuse authority.
1 policeman went drinking with his friend. When his friend is drunk and started scolding the policeman, the moron policeman abuse his authority by arresting his friend and say want to charge him for making a public nuisance.
If policeman can do such things to their own friend, what else they can't do to the public whom they don't know
A lot? How many instances can you cite? Have you actually gone down to perform your own research? Or is it merely hearsay? But I digress.
If there are instances of alleged abuse, then feel free to report accordingly. If found guilty they will be dealt with accordingly both with internal measures, as well as with the law. Usually both. There are, and will always be bad apples. Everywhere. For any organization, any line of work. These will be dealt with accordingly and thrown off the cart.
But please don't taint all with one stroke of the same brush.
ur friend is lame.
and are you sure its a friend, and not you yourself sending these sms?
y u wollie.
it's u rite.
Originally posted by Hello Kitty:y u wollie.
it's u rite.
i am starting to feel more and more that it is him.
Originally posted by xunni:
Because there are alot of policeman who abuse authority.
1 policeman went drinking with his friend. When his friend is drunk and started scolding the policeman, the moron policeman abuse his authority by arresting his friend and say want to charge him for making a public nuisance.
If policeman can do such things to their own friend, what else they can't do to the public whom they don't know
Originally posted by xunni:
1 policeman went drinking with his friend. When his friend is drunk and started scolding the policeman, the moron policeman abuse his authority by arresting his friend and say want to charge him for making a public nuisance.
Oh.....so you mean, since the policeman went drinking with his friend. His friend scold and wake up the whole wide world.......is not making a public nuisance of himself lah.
That only because policeman is a friend and do no action against a person that creates a public nuisance to the world.........is not abusing the police power lah.
BTW, how did the police officer come about able to arrest a creating a public nuisance fella during his off work drinking session?