Let me tell u this nicely, SMRT does not give a d*** for CSS services nowOriginally posted by iveco:Who told you so? There's not notice of it on SMRT's website? Ayway, it should just be given to SBST since it goes to SBST territory. Same with 608.
http://www.sbstransit.com.sg/whatsnew_05august2004_01.aspOriginally posted by sbst275:http://www.sbstransit.com.sg/whatsnew_05august2004.asp
Closure of bus stop along Raffles Ave due to NDP celebration on 08/ 09/ 14/ 15 Aug 2004 bet 1600-0300
Another 1 regarding closure of bus stop at Hg St 21 but notice shows the Marina one instead
Finally, SBS is back to Toh Tuck Ave But why 507 is axed?Originally posted by Zilchster:With effect from Sunday 22th August 2004, New Trunk Service 183 will be introduced to cater to the rapid development and commuter demand of Toh Guan Ind Estate.
It provides links between Toh Guan and Jurong East, Clementi and Kent Ridge.
On the same day, Express Service 507 will be withdrawn.
183: Jurong East - Kent Ridge (Loop)
Via Jurong East St 13, Jurong East Central, Toh Guan Rd, Toh Guan Rd East, Old Toh Tuck Rd, Toh Tuck Ave, C'wealth Ave West, Clementi Rd (Loop)
Operating hours: 0545 - 2330 hrs daily
Peak: 12 min
Off Peak: 15 min
Information courtesy of service_238
507's demand is from Toh Guan mainly. So the MRT reason is really ilogical as you would take 105 then EWL, where is the direct journey then?Originally posted by leeJZ:Svc 507 can be chopped, MRT is faster and cheaper without the need to change trains.
was refering to svc 507 pax living in Jurong West.Originally posted by sbst275:507's demand is from Toh Guan mainly. So the MRT reason is really ilogical as you would take, where is the direct journey then?
Say clearly, 507 has overloading capacity FYIOriginally posted by leeJZ:was refering to svc 507 pax living in Jurong West.
dont forget it has 25min headways.Originally posted by sbst275:Say clearly, 507 has overloading capacity FYI
Ya lah, but the bus is packed until passengers is standing on bth entrance and exit stepsOriginally posted by leeJZ:dont forget it has 25min headways.
That's why I'm puzzled as well... Although frequency is 25 mins, it is a cash cow to residents at Toh Guan Rd. That's why I'm enhancing it by making travelling time shorter.Originally posted by sbs&tibs:Look, 183 does not really serve 507 withdrawn sector, isn't it? It was said that 507 had quite some loads right? What is the reason of withdrawn.
OFF TOPIC: BNL took 182 from JRE and now JRE taking 507 away from BNL. Doen't it looks like a cycle?
Then can 183 be enhanced? Combining it with 95 or 200, for instance.Originally posted by sbst275:Regarding 183, it seems that that is a solution other than Sv 96
Maybe not from anyway I can see as for 95, it will skip Kent Ridge which may trouble people. 200 maybe but you know that 183 is a new service that they are just to link up Old Toh Tuck Rd and Toh Guan Rd East as there are no oth svsOriginally posted by iveco:Then can 183 be enhanced? Combining it with 95 or 200, for instance.
Service 95 needs to serve Kent Ridge terminal, so not feasible. As for service 200, it has a frequency of 20 to 25 minutes while service 183 is about 12 minutes, so there may be a problem.Originally posted by iveco:Then can 183 be enhanced? Combining it with 95 or 200, for instance.
dunno?Originally posted by iveco:Is SMRT doing any more VLS trials? Or do they have to sort out 189 first?
Services 962 and 964 from this sunday 29 Aug.Originally posted by iveco:Is SMRT doing any more VLS trials? Or do they have to sort out 189 first?