I guess this has probably been mentioned before, but any chance that 156 will be shortened to Buangkok Int once it opens? Can relieve high loading on 43/M (as most pax take 43 from Buangkok nowadays instead of 156 from Sengkang) and improve 156's loading. Deleted sectors more or less covered by 43 and 159.
still remember when there was a bus stop constructed right outside the lrt station for alighting activities only at the old bpj int before heading to the alighting berth... really unexpected for it to become smaller
kg bahru terminal construction in progress.
I'm sure there will be boarding allowed when its ready
Originally posted by lemon1974:kg bahru terminal construction in progress.
Is it where the old KTM goods yard used to be?
Originally posted by carbikebus:Buangkok will have a feeder svc and will relieve some of Hougang Ctrl Int Svc
HGS shouldn't have just closed down like that. It could serve the same purpose as YCK.
Originally posted by iveco:Is it where the old KTM goods yard used to be?
Actually can built a depot near that area too for Bt Merah and CBD svc.Ulu Pandan should just control Clementi/Kent Ridge/Buona Vista/Part of J East svc
Originally posted by carbikebus:Waiting for New New Bridge Rd Ter by next year.
LTA should consider building a new Buona Vista Int thus can demolish Buona Vista and Ghim Moh Ter.Svc 32,48,74,74e,91,92/M,100,111,145,191,200 & 1 new feeder.
4 Boarding,3 Alighting berths and 26 parking lots sound good enough.
New feeder can loop at Mei Chin. Cover the opposite side not served by 64.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Actually can built a depot near that area too for Bt Merah and CBD svc.Ulu Pandan should just control Clementi/Kent Ridge/Buona Vista/Part of J East svc
JE services so far only 197 under Clementi package. Also, the only route without dead mileage under Bukit Merah package is 160.
Originally posted by iveco:JE services so far only 197 under Clementi package. Also, the only route without dead mileage under Bukit Merah package is 160.
197 should be under Bt Merah since they all will be temporary using Ulu Pandan.170 should be under Mandai🤣
Speaking about Changi Village,The proposed svc 68 should start from there using Loyang Way/PSR Dr 3/Dr 8/Dr 1/St 71/Tampines ave 10/11/Concourse and Tampines Int
It will be good if the plot of land at Ghim Moh is utilized as ITH, best location should be opposite Block 14.
Originally posted by iveco:New feeder can loop at Mei Chin. Cover the opposite side not served by 64.
Why need to loop so far away?
Got a feeling that Punggol new B4 will see 4 service move there.Original berth 1 will be converted to alighting bay,B2 become B1,B3 to B2,B4 to B3..New Concourse is B4 & B5.Svc 34,84,136 & 381 will move to B4.
http://routes.one/idea/ for the area 5
Originally posted by lemon1974:kg bahru terminal construction in progress.
Is the name confirmed?
Best thing is to make Arbp expansion.Bbdep can close down and Ulu Pandan is the replacement.Arbp or Ayer Rajah Depot renamed after the expansion.
Ulu Pandan Depot
Jurong East(Tenant):105,160,197 & 506.
Clementi:All except 7,14 & 156.
Kent Ridge:95,200 & 201.
Boon Lay(Tenant):30 & 198.
Buona Vista:48 & 74/74e.
Ayer Rajah Depot
Buona Vista(Tenant):91,145 & 191.
Ghim Moh:92/92M & 111(111 terminate at MCT)
Bt Merah:131,132,139(Withdraw 139M),272 & 273
Harbourfront:93,123
Marina Centre:195
Shenton Way:186,400 & 402.
New Bridge Rd:120,121 & 122
SBST 5 Lots at PGL Int shifted over near to engress area
Tampines Concourse Int remains a ghost town after more than half a year in operations...
Originally posted by SBS7557R:Tampines Concourse Int remains a ghost town after more than half a year in operations...
And what will you say about Changi Business Park Terminal and Compassvale Interchange? :))
At least Compassvale and CBP have signs of new svcs...TC int on the contrary is nowhere near being developed in future
Originally posted by SBS7557R:Tampines Concourse Int remains a ghost town after more than half a year in operations...
Out of curiosity, how is 18's loading after the amendment? Did it become even worse?
Originally posted by array88:Out of curiosity, how is 18's loading after the amendment? Did it become even worse?
Only picks up from Tampines Ave 7
Tampines Concourse should be renamed as Terminal...Why Concourse?Its because the main int already congested and there is no available land to expand nearby so Concourse is the best choice.Same goes to Compassvale,merely an expansion of Sengkang only except LTA decide to add fancy name.Give terminal/Int make noise why not much ppl,Never give later kpkb why no terminal/int here or there.You all go work for LTA and take over Senior position then you reorganised back lor the bus packages and bus service..I'll be fully supportive.
Can Beach Station hold up to 4 bus routes? If yes, we can scrap 188R and 963R and extend their respective parent routes permanently to Beach Station.