Route Suggestions (Part 7)
-
In future 48 will start from CBP Ter and lost sector will be covered by a new svc passingby Bndep and loop somewhere near Chai Chee.
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
In future 48 will start from CBP Ter and lost sector will be covered by a new svc passingby Bndep and loop somewhere near Chai Chee.
Really?
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Less than half of 48 commuters from these sectors are long haul travellers... And even if there are more I don't think it is a harm to transfer to 48 at PP or MP lib, esp when 1. There are many alternatives to PP and reduction in fleet will mean more buses for alternatives and 2. It is a same stop transfer...
There are many more in earlier sectors who need access to PP/Rochor/Middle west YET only stuck with 48 which winds like no mother... We also need to improve connections for them yknow...
Push.
@busAnalayzer
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Push.
@busAnalayzer
I am not in favor of this suggestion. Anyway, my comment was not for you, but was for dupdup because he does not support any suggestions where people have to transfer (even if it is good for the majority).
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
I am not in favor of this suggestion. Anyway, my comment was not for you, but was for dupdup because he does not support any suggestions where people have to transfer (even if it is good for the majority).
Ok, can
It shall stand firm that this is a good suggestion then.
-
Bus service from Clementi to Changi?
Clementi > CTE > City > ECP
or
Clementi > AYE > Harbourfront > MCE > ECP
-
Originally posted by SMB3130Z:
Bus service from Clementi to Changi?
Clementi > CTE > City > ECP
or
Clementi > AYE > Harbourfront > MCE > ECP
Clementi has reached its full capacity.
Could consider BBT > Clementi > AYE > City > ECP > Airport. -
Originally posted by SBS9252G:
Clementi has reached its full capacity.
Could consider BBT > Clementi > AYE > City > ECP > Airport.Tengah also.
-
Originally posted by SBS9252G:
Clementi has reached its full capacity.
Could consider BBT > Clementi > AYE > City > ECP > Airport.Full capacity meaning? LTA has a quota or?
-
Originally posted by SMB3130Z:
Full capacity meaning? LTA has a quota or?
meaning that it just nice fits in the services plying in Clementi Int.
-
This has been suggested a zillion times.
Service 110: Hougang Central - Tampines (same as 27)
Service 71: Pasir Ris - Changi Airport (covers 27's Tampines - Airport sectors entirely) Operated by Go-Ahead.
Service 27: Hougang Central - Changi Airport (same as 27, but skipping Tampines entirely)
-
Originally posted by SBS3004X:
This has been suggested a zillion times.
Service 110: Hougang Central - Tampines (same as 27)
Service 71: Pasir Ris - Changi Airport (covers 27's Tampines - Airport sectors entirely) Operated by Go-Ahead.
Service 27: Hougang Central - Changi Airport (same as 27, but skipping Tampines entirely)
Hi mr sbs3004X, not to say I am a spoilsport. I think this sort of suggestion will straight go into dustbin if you propose to LTA, irregardless of the number of times. One service 27 split into 3? Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr sbs3004X, not to say I am a spoilsport. I think this sort of suggestion will straight go into dustbin if you propose to LTA, irregardless of the number of times. One service 27 split into 3? Cheers. Thanks.
Firstly... Its IRRESPECTIVE not irregardless... Thats a double negative...
Also, whats wrong with splitting if it could 1. Relieve loading and 2. Give room for DDs at Tamp sector? Whats YOUR justification?? We have sound reasons behind this and we really dont get where your skewed logic come from.
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Firstly... Its IRRESPECTIVE not irregardless... Thats a double negative...
Also, whats wrong with splitting if it could 1. Relieve loading and 2. Give room for DDs at Tamp sector? Whats YOUR justification?? We have sound reasons behind this and we really dont get where your skewed logic come from.
Hi mr SMB128B, irregardless is also correct.
Seriously you accept 1 split into 3? Why not split into 4 or even 5 then? I still can accept if 1 route is split into 2. Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr SMB128B, irregardless is also correct.
Seriously you accept 1 split into 3? Why not split into 4 or even 5 then? I still can accept if 1 route is split into 2. Cheers. Thanks.
Irregardless is a wrong form... But if you wanna use broken english wtv I'm not stopping u anymore...
I accept leh... Why not? So much benefits dont accept? Got benefit in your face dont accept? Rly funny eh u.
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Irregardless is a wrong form... But if you wanna use broken english wtv I'm not stopping u anymore...
I accept leh... Why not? So much benefits dont accept? Got benefit in your face dont accept? Rly funny eh u.
Hi mr SMB128B, you or I accept is useless. Lef the route planners decide and we shall see if anything comes close to these 3 new/modified routes (110, 71, 27) in the next 20 years. Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr SMB128B, you or I accept is useless. Lef the route planners decide and we shall see if anything comes close to these 3 new/modified routes (110, 71, 27) in the next 20 years. Cheers. Thanks.
Well, there's a reason why this thread is titled "Route suggestions" rather than "Route implementation proposals". It's just a platform to put ideas for discussion. Of course you can look at the suggestions from a policy-based point of view, but don't be too hasty to shoot them down just yet with little consideration for other aspects ※
(Btw the correct spelling is "regardless", as in the pledge ;)
-
858 and 27 to move to Terminal 4 in the interim.
Change the Terminal 3 bus stops to departure hall.
-
Originally posted by AJQZC:
Well, there's a reason why this thread is titled "Route suggestions" rather than "Route implementation proposals". It's just a platform to put ideas for discussion. Of course you can look at the suggestions from a policy-based point of view, but don't be too hasty to shoot them down just yet with little consideration for other aspects ※
(Btw the correct spelling is "regardless", as in the pledge ;)
Hi mr AJQZC, yes I understand the rationale. But I also can give my frank opinion so I say I am not a spoilsport in the beginning. It is another guy (I shall not name) who does not agree with this. Anybody has right to shoot down or agree.
Irrespective of the number of times
Irregardless of the number of times
regardless of the number of times
All 3 words are correct. Same meaning. Check the dictionary already. Mr AJQZC and mr SMB128B, please take note since you are very interested in correcting English.
Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr AJQZC, yes I understand the rationale. But I also can give my frank opinion so I say I am not a spoilsport in the beginning. It is another guy (I shall not name) who does not agree with this. Anybody has right to shoot down or agree.
Irrespective of the number of times
Irregardless of the number of times
regardless of the number of times
All 3 words are correct. Same meaning. Check the dictionary already. Mr AJQZC and mr SMB128B, please take note since you are very interested in correcting English.
Cheers. Thanks.
Think you should be the one checking the dict... Daft fellow...
-
Originally posted by SBS3004X:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
haha!
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Think you should be the one checking the dict... Daft fellow...
Hi mr SMB128B, all 3 words are recognized to be usable. Even irregardless has been written into the dictionary and has gained acceptance. Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr SMB128B, all 3 words are recognized to be usable. Even irregardless has been written into the dictionary and has gained acceptance. Cheers. Thanks.
Accepted =/= correct -
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr SMB128B, all 3 words are recognized to be usable. Even irregardless has been written into the dictionary and has gained acceptance. Cheers. Thanks.
It's just that hard to admit you're wrong? Ppl point out ur mistakes, just politely thank and take note of it... Dont need to stubbornly insist on your wrong ways... Juz sayin