Originally posted by carbikebus:518 ply KPE/PIE after MBS towards Pasir Ris tommorow,S17 now bi-directions and I'm not suprised if S62 terminate at Lor 1 Geylang
Hi mr carbikebus, are all these approved by LTA? What I know is Go Ahead can only manage the depots and buses. As for bus route planning, it is LTA prerogative. Not the service provider. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by dupdup77:Hi mr carbikebus, are all these approved by LTA? What I know is Go Ahead can only manage the depots and buses. As for bus route planning, it is LTA prerogative. Not the service provider. Cheers. Thanks.
Its approved by LTA,Go Ahead can't do anything..Even fleet management also,If they say this duty use DD die2 must use DD
You can ask Hgdep103 to post the picture here
Originally posted by dupdup77:Hi mr carbikebus, are all these approved by LTA? What I know is Go Ahead can only manage the depots and buses. As for bus route planning, it is LTA prerogative. Not the service provider. Cheers. Thanks.
Technically the 518 case isnt so much of a route amendment, it all depends on what you define as "amendment"... Since there are no bus stops in between it may not be counted as an "amendment" since no passengers are affected in that sense...
Besides if you read the conditions for Express svcs it clearly stated that "Different routings along Express sectors may be used with varying traffic conditions"... This means that the express sector is by itself flexible in nature, and if it means reduced travel time (which is true in this case) then BCs are in fact ENCOURAGED to take alternatives...
Originally posted by SMB128B:Technically the 518 case isnt so much of a route amendment, it all depends on what you define as "amendment"... Since there are no bus stops in between it may not be counted as an "amendment" since no passengers are affected in that sense...
Besides if you read the conditions for Express svcs it clearly stated that "Different routings along Express sectors may be used with varying traffic conditions"... This means that the express sector is by itself flexible in nature, and if it means reduced travel time (which is true in this case) then BCs are in fact ENCOURAGED to take alternatives...
They wanted 518 to go by KPE at first, waited 8 years to resolve this suggestion.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Its approved by LTA,Go Ahead can't do anything..Even fleet management also,If they say this duty use DD die2 must use DD
Hi mr carbikebus, noted and thanks.
Originally posted by SMB128B:Technically the 518 case isnt so much of a route amendment, it all depends on what you define as "amendment"... Since there are no bus stops in between it may not be counted as an "amendment" since no passengers are affected in that sense...
Besides if you read the conditions for Express svcs it clearly stated that "Different routings along Express sectors may be used with varying traffic conditions"... This means that the express sector is by itself flexible in nature, and if it means reduced travel time (which is true in this case) then BCs are in fact ENCOURAGED to take alternatives...
Hi mr smb128B, noted and thanks.
Originally posted by hgdep103:
Image here: http://oi64.tinypic.com/nwnay8.jpg
What is wrong with 187? SD spam and only 2 DDs?
Go Ahead welcome back 17 ex drivers with promise that they will only drive 1 service.
10 Tower Transit drivers resigned.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Go Ahead welcome back 17 ex drivers with promise that they will only drive 1 service.
10 Tower Transit drivers resigned.
Hi mr carbikebus, like that also can? Unbelievable to resign and come back. Bus drivers 1 Go Ahead Singapore 0. Means go ahead succumb to threats in another sense, although albeit indirectly. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by hgdep103:Image here: http://oi64.tinypic.com/nwnay8.jpg
Hi mr hgdep103, cannot see image. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by dupdup77:Hi mr carbikebus, like that also can? Unbelievable to resign and come back. Bus drivers 1 Go Ahead Singapore 0. Means go ahead succumb to threats in another sense, although albeit indirectly. Cheers. Thanks.
It's officially in media not i leak info or what.
Originally posted by carbikebus:It's officially in media not i leak info or what.
Hi mr carbikebus, also good. At least can provide some respite for passengers on Go Ahead bus routes. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by SBS3004X:What is wrong with 187? SD spam and only 2 DDs?
Nothing new about it.
Next bus package to be operated by new operator from 2017/18 could be Tampines (10, 18). Follows 17 (of which it is infrequent).
Originally posted by TPS Timothy Mok:Next bus package to be operated by new operator from 2017/18 could be Tampines (10, 18). Follows 17 (of which it is infrequent).
Hi mr TPS Timothy Mok, no more already la. All fixed except for seletar package tender decision on 6 October 2016. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by dupdup77:Hi mr TPS Timothy Mok, no more already la. All fixed except for seletar package tender decision on 6 October 2016. Cheers. Thanks.
No need to take serious on his post. He is crazy.
All, so how is situation today? Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by dupdup77:All, so how is situation today? Cheers. Thanks.
What situation?I only heard 358 and 359 travel 4 buses within 3 mins..Too many SBST want to drive Townlinks.
Originally posted by carbikebus:What situation?I only heard 358 and 359 travel 4 buses within 3 mins..Too many SBST want to drive Townlinks.
Hi mr carbikebus, I mean the situation for all the go ahead services for Punggol, pasir ris, Changi village and Changi airport (service 36). Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by SBS3004X:What is wrong with 187? SD spam and only 2 DDs?
What is new in it? ;-)
Originally posted by SBS7123J:No need to take serious on his post. He is crazy.
Don't feed the troll.