I see Woodlands Tpt and Kumho Bus line/Tian San shipping stand a chance.
Well ANYONE will operate 851 better than SMRT anyway so it doesnt really matter. Even the Singapore School Bus Association will do better.
Hi mr carbikebus, do you know whether Go Ahead made any improvements? People still complain about long frequency for 34, 62, 136, 386. Did they fine tune the bus headway between buses for these 4 services? Cheers. Thanks.
Go-ahead confirm that they will operate Sv17A as well.
hmm.. so 17A will still go inside BNDEP??
Originally posted by lemon1974:Go-ahead confirm that they will operate Sv17A as well.
hmm.. so 17A will still go inside BNDEP??
Hi mr lemon1974, LTA has already made clear 17A start with Go Ahead long time back. 17A first stop will be its current 2nd stop. No more going inside BNDEP. Cheers. Thanks.
I dont think GA will take 17A,Start from 1st bus stop then where is the layover?36 style of bus ah no off engine?
Originally posted by dupdup77:Hi mr carbikebus, do you know whether Go Ahead made any improvements? People still complain about long frequency for 34, 62, 136, 386. Did they fine tune the bus headway between buses for these 4 services? Cheers. Thanks.
34 because of Ave 7 jams and overcrowding issue.19th change to new roster where one service per BC and no need jump bus.62 bunching issues la,One time travel 3-4 buses..OCC now slightly better.136 Serangoon Gdns mah..5 ex Amdep BC join also.386 need more improvement.
bus 34 need 20 buses on weekdays (including 34a).
this sun pasir ris residents get ready for go home late aka go ahead. let's c
Originally posted by carbikebus:I dont think GA will take 17A,Start from 1st bus stop then where is the layover?36 style of bus ah no off engine?
Hi mr carbikebus, go ahead will take 17A. The 17A must follow its parent route 17 to the same bus company. No such thing as break up and give to other companies. 17A will start from its 2nd bus stop with effect from 18 sep. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by carbikebus:34 because of Ave 7 jams and overcrowding issue.19th change to new roster where one service per BC and no need jump bus.62 bunching issues la,One time travel 3-4 buses..OCC now slightly better.136 Serangoon Gdns mah..5 ex Amdep BC join also.386 need more improvement.
Hi mr carbikebus, thanks for your update. Cheers
Originally posted by dupdup77:Hi mr carbikebus, thanks for your update. Cheers
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
I hope it applies to SMRT/SBST/TT also. SMRT everyday can see 1 bus do 4 svc after one BC finish their short shift
Hi mr TIB585L, yes I sincerely hope so. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
I hope it applies to SMRT/SBST/TT also. SMRT everyday can see 1 bus do 4 svc after one BC finish their short shift
Just now one SMRT bendy mealbreak at Loyang for svc 67 and he is already 18 mins late!
Originally posted by carbikebus:Just now one SMRT bendy mealbreak at Loyang for svc 67 and he is already 18 mins late!
Overall from my point of view GA has made an effort and has a slight improvement in fact much better for most svc minus traffic conditions and breakdowns.Although some newbies still doesn't know where and where to start downroute except for T1/T2..But again they take the effort to learn.
S3 i give a rate of 8 out 10
S34 around 6 out 10,Still need 2 more buses.Nvm about bunchings.
S43 i rate 7 out of 10 if not for the traffic conditions.43M still need to improve.
62:6.5 out of 10.
82:7 out of 10,Need 1 more split bus.
83:9 out of 10 and too pampered already.
84:No comments
85:9 out of 10
118:Improving i give 7.5 out of 10
119:Too pampered
136:5 out of 10,Need add 2 more DDs during split shift.
382:6 out of 10
386:4 out of 10 during peak
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
Why eat at loyang? Tampines no more canteen ah
969 also got mealbreaks at Lydep.LTA reason is not to congested the Int.
Originally posted by carbikebus:969 also got mealbreaks at Lydep.LTA reason is not to congested the Int.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Overall from my point of view GA has made an effort and has a slight improvement in fact much better for most svc minus traffic conditions and breakdowns.Although some newbies still doesn't know where and where to start downroute except for T1/T2..But again they take the effort to learn.
S3 i give a rate of 8 out 10
S34 around 6 out 10,Still need 2 more buses.Nvm about bunchings.
S43 i rate 7 out of 10 if not for the traffic conditions.43M still need to improve.
62:6.5 out of 10.
82:7 out of 10,Need 1 more split bus.
83:9 out of 10 and too pampered already.
84:No comments
85:9 out of 10
118:Improving i give 7.5 out of 10
119:Too pampered
136:5 out of 10,Need add 2 more DDs during split shift.
382:6 out of 10
386:4 out of 10 during peak
Hi mr carbikebus, fair review. Most complaints are on 62, 118, 136, 386. Recently, 386 received a lot of flaks for witnessing the longest queue at interchange ever since 386 is introduced. Cheers. Thanks.
Sv85 got 9 out of 10? So many ppl complain abt 20-30 mins headway.
Originally posted by lemon1974:Sv85 got 9 out of 10? So many ppl complain abt 20-30 mins headway.
Hi mr lemon1974, the frequency for service 85 has been known to be as poor as 15-20 mins at off-peak hours even during Sbs transit time. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by lemon1974:Sv85 got 9 out of 10? So many ppl complain abt 20-30 mins headway.
Now running with 15 buses with at least 12 DDs also you all not happy ah?
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
Hahahaha what a joke, They have been doing this for the past 20-30 years with less problem, no wonder during peak hour i saw some buses suddenly off svc at woodlands then reappear 1h later
I still think 969 got 4 Amdep duties that start from Woodlands.Rest 23 duties is Loyang.
Originally posted by carbikebus:I still think 969 got 4 Amdep duties that start from Woodlands.Rest 23 duties is Loyang.
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
No wonder i saw some AMDEP 851 or yishun buses on 969 wich make me think whether those 851 buses parked at Loyang or not
Lydep 23 duties and Amdep 4 duties,Amdep one start and end at WTBI.