Originally posted by lemon1974:Looking at bus arrival timing , really having issue
now at serangoon JC bus stop.
82 27 mins NA
119 28 mins 29 mins
136 2 mins 29 mins
surely go ahead can do better right?
Even GA also can cock up Sv 84..
Originally posted by SMB315C:Even GA also can cock up Sv 84..
So far now already solved..Svc 3 consistently at 9-13 mins,Svc 43 now at 8-14 mins,34 just add 2 more buses from Airport T3/T1/T2 and TPE bus stop.62 2 buses start from Sims Ave..
Its not easy when no former Punggol SBST BCs working today leh,Most of the GA Punggol BCs is newbies,No experience in bus industry
Bunching from punggol interchange... not even midway route for svc 85 and 386
I believe I saw more
Originally posted by SMB5007J:Bunching from punggol interchange... not even midway route for svc 85 and 386
I believe I saw more
I took full route 43 today from Punggol to UEC. I saw SG5081X and SG5104P bunched along Upper East Coast Rd towards Punggol, just 5 mins away from UEC terminal.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Of all svc they deploy DDs to 83?Today 118 half fleet all SDs,Mon-Fri like that Goodluck!
Today...
I leave the no-shit-sherlock conclusion of this statement to your interpretation.
Originally posted by SMB128B:Today...
I leave the no-shit-sherlock conclusion of this statement to your interpretation.
Just feedback to LTA since they're the one who implement no overrtaking,adhere to schedules and rosters.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Just feedback to LTA since they're the one who implement no overrtaking,adhere to schedules and rosters.
Seems like you didnt get my drift...
It makes total sense for 118 to have SDs today — because nobody goes to school! And CBP will be completely empty. At best prob IKEA and CCP people. SD is more than enough for them.
We will have to wait and see tmr...
Originally posted by SMB128B:Seems like you didnt get my drift...
It makes total sense for 118 to have SDs today — because nobody goes to school! And CBP will be completely empty. At best prob IKEA and CCP people. SD is more than enough for them.
We will have to wait and see tmr...
I get what you meant but again some people keep on apps me why today many SDs on 118,Why 83 put DDs,Why this why that..Its annoying especially when I'm praying just to see some people keep on complaining like I'm the one who own the company
All, just give them time to resolve the issues. This is what you expect when you get a third party to run bus services in Singapore for the first day. Will turn out better and better in days to come! Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by dupdup77:All, just give them time to resolve the issues. This is what you expect when you get a third party to run bus services in Singapore for the first day. Will turn out better and better in days to come! Cheers. Thanks.
�
What happened to all the PGL route BCs? Did they choose to remain with SBST? All stay in HGDEP?
It is better to let a 5th company (preferably Asian) take over Seletar. They can also run the Hougang contract when it is up for tender. It also makes sense for Jurong West to go under TT and Tampines to be GAG's area of control. SMRT can keep their existing 3 contracts and SBST retain the last 5. In short, SBST would have 5 contracts, SMRT 3 and everyone else 2 each. That way, nobody controls over 50% market share because they don't deserve to.
Bukit Merah contract should take in 65 (ARBP majority) and kick out 145 (full BRBP). Preferred operator: SBST, Depot: ARBP
Sembawang contract should take in 117 (SBW route group) and kick out all WDL routes. Preferred operator: SMRT, Depot: MDDEP (AMDEP turned over to SBST)
Hougang contract should take in 156 (HGDEP majority) and kick out 117 (Orphan route). Preferred operator: 5th Co, Depot: HGDEP
Bedok contract should take in 197 (BNDEP majority) and kick out 46 (TAM route group). Preferred operator: SBST, Depot: BNDEP
Chua Chu Kang contract should kick out 61 (Orphan route). Preferred operator: SMRT, Depot: BBDEP (when UPDEP is ready, KJDEP to be decommissioned)
Woodlands contract should take in 169, 963, 965, 966 & 969 (WDL route group). Preferred operator: SMRT, Depot: WLDEP
Tampines contract should take in 46 (TAM route group) and kick out 65 (ARBP majority). Preferred operator: GAG, Depot: ECDEP
Jurong West contract should take in 174 (BNL route group). Preferred operator: TT, Depot: SLBP
Serangoon contract should take in 61 (EUN route group) and kick out all BSH routes. Prefered operator: SBST, Depot: KCDEP
Clementi contract should kick out 156 (HGDEP majority), 174 (BNL route group) and 197 (BNDEP majority). Preferred operator: SBST, Depot: UPDEP (BBDEP to assume control of Chua Chu Kang)
Bishan contract should take in 53, 55, 58, 59 (BSH route group) and 145 (TPY route group). Preferred operator: SBST, Depot: AMDEP (incorporating SMRT AMDEP, BRBP to be decommissioned)
Originally posted by iveco:What happened to all the PGL route BCs? Did they choose to remain with SBST? All stay in HGDEP?
It is better to let a 5th company (preferably Asian) take over Seletar. They can also run the Hougang contract when it is up for tender. It also makes sense for Jurong West to go under TT and Tampines to be GAG's area of control. SMRT can keep their existing 3 contracts and SBST retain the last 5. In short, SBST would have 5 contracts, SMRT 3 and everyone else 2 each. That way, nobody controls over 50% market share because they don't deserve to.
Bukit Merah contract should take in 65 (ARBP majority) and kick out 145 (full BRBP).
Sembawang contract should take in 117 (SEM route group) and kick out all WDL routes.
Hougang contract should take in 156 (HGDEP majority) and kick out 117 (Orphan route).
Only 41 Punggol BCs follow GA because of the location of the depot from their homes and of course the same salary.For Pasir Ris,Mostly senior BCs and newbies follow GA..Others chose to stay with SBST.Pasir Ris svc 6,17,354,358,359,403 and svc 2 almost 80% follow GA.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Only 41 Punggol BCs follow GA because of the location of the depot from their homes and of course the same salary.For Pasir Ris,Mostly senior BCs and newbies follow GA..Others chose to stay with SBST.Pasir Ris svc 6,17,354,358,359,403 and svc 2 almost 80% follow GA.
I saw a former SBST 43 BC driving SBS3308U on 43 today.
GA allocated parking lots for other interchanges and Terminals.
Ang Mo Kio Int:2 lots for 136.
Changi Business Park Ter:2 lots for 118.
Upp East Coast Ter:2 lots for 43.
Tampines Int:2 lots for 3 and 1 lot for future 68.
New Bridge Rd Ter:2 lots each for 2 and 12.
All, many of my neighbours give Go Ahead Singapore the thumbs down and prefer Sbs transit. Long waiting time at Punggol central bus stops is the top complaint. Bus services objective is to lessen commuters waiting time and provide frequent services. They have feedbacked to the office staff at Punggol bus interchange. Hope it improves over time. I know when I write this, it will invite lots of criticisms. However I am just stating the facts. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by dupdup77:All, many of my neighbours give Go Ahead Singapore the thumbs down and prefer Sbs transit. Long waiting time at Punggol central bus stops is the top complaint. Bus services objective is to lessen commuters waiting time and provide frequent services. They have feedbacked to the office staff at Punggol bus interchange. Hope it improves over time. I know when I write this, it will invite lots of criticisms. However I am just stating the facts. Cheers. Thanks.
service standard doesnt improve overnight
it takes time. i understand it must be frustrated to wait for the bus at the bus-stop for so long.
but i feel that we need to give Go-ahead more time to solve teething issues
definitely they will improve
dun bombard me too... just my opinion though
#experiencewithTTtoo #samething
LTA ruling mahhh
I propose that S118 split shift duties start at CBP from 1715,1723,1731,1739 and 1800hrs..
Originally posted by azharjj:service standard doesnt improve overnight
it takes time. i understand it must be frustrated to wait for the bus at the bus-stop for so long.
but i feel that we need to give Go-ahead more time to solve teething issues
definitely they will improve
dun bombard me too... just my opinion though
#experiencewithTTtoo #samething
Hi mr azharjj, so does the TT frequency improve by now? I don't trust newspaper reports as their views always borderline on the good side. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by dupdup77:Hi mr azharjj, so does the TT frequency improve by now? I don't trust newspaper reports as their views always borderline on the good side. Cheers. Thanks.
TT still got hiccups but not that much..So does SBST and SMRT now..Problem is no fixed buses,Jump into another service and block..Wah lao..SMRT also got tons of complain for svc 969 particularly with more Citaros..
Originally posted by carbikebus:TT still got hiccups but not that much..So does SBST and SMRT now..Problem is no fixed buses,Jump into another service and block..Wah lao..SMRT also got tons of complain for svc 969 particularly with more Citaros..T Today they put bendies on AP slot and the Citaro on split lol
Originally posted by carbikebus:TT still got hiccups but not that much..So does SBST and SMRT now..Problem is no fixed buses,Jump into another service and block..Wah lao..SMRT also got tons of complain for svc 969 particularly with more Citaros..
Saw an comment on Go-ahead facebook
"386 is it lost in punggol"?
Originally posted by lemon1974:Saw an comment on Go-ahead facebook
"386 is it lost in punggol"?
And i kena banned from their FB also...I merely suggesting to improve the situation but kena banned..After this what?Terminate me?