Originally posted by TIB 585L:SMB19H SMB20C SMB60L-SMB62G SMB67T SMB69M SMB84T SMB106P SMB113T SMB119C SMB120Y-SMB122S, SMB124L, SMB126G- SMB134H permed 858. 24 OC perms last time.
A lot of them transfer to KJ..
Originally posted by SMB3163D:A lot of them transfer to KJ..
Most of them transfer to KJ to facilitate 173 WAB status. While others went to AMDEP
Originally posted by TIB 585L:SMB19H SMB20C SMB60L-SMB62G SMB67T SMB69M SMB84T SMB106P SMB113T SMB119C SMB120Y-SMB122S, SMB124L, SMB126G- SMB134H permed 858. 24 OC perms last time.
Originally posted by Sbs6750E:
really missed the good days. 27,34 and 53 used to have lots of KUBs while 858 had OCs. Now must squees inside citaro/A22.
true but i miss the 0405s more
979M demand not very good, happened to be at Opp Blk 765 today at 7am and 1.30pm, where the school is nearby..
Originally posted by TIB 585L:true but i miss the 0405s more
who doesnt lol
Hi TIB 585L
Firstly, apologies for making assumptions. Indeed, I am still used to making assumptions when I am trying to get rid of the habit. Do pardon my behaviour since I am very different from you.
In fact, I have actually rode 858 for only 6 years since 2010, therefore I do not know much about the route a lot than you.
Though I would suggest if you can be cooler next time so to prevent yourself from making harsh replies. Not forcing you to change, but just my suggestion. No hard feelings, too.
SMB1368T
Originally posted by Sbs6750E:really missed the good days. 27,34 and 53 used to have lots of KUBs while 858 had OCs. Now must squees inside citaro/A22.
27 and 34 because of JB registration of KUBs.
Originally posted by SBS3004X:Does Service 77 need DDs?
NO.
Originally posted by array88:I guess words already cannot describe how poorly planned 150 is.
150 loading is awful. Need to withdraw or modify.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:150 loading is awful. Need to withdraw or modify.
Amend better..loop at East Coast Park Svc Rd 401 routes
Originally posted by carbikebus:Amend better..loop at East Coast Park Svc Rd 401 routes
15
Eunos Interchange <> Pasir Ris Interchange
150 (withdraw sv 11)
Lor 1 Geylang <> Bartley Road (East)
Lor 1 Geylang
Sims Ave
Mountbatten Road
Stadium
Tanjong Rhu Road
Rhu Cross
Tanjong Rhu Road
Fort Road / ECP (exp)
Tanjong Katong Road South
Mountbatten Road (exp)
Amber Road
Marine Parade Road
Tehlok Kurau Road
Joo Chiat Place
Still Road
Jalan Eunos
Eunos Link
Ubi Ave
Ubi Road 3
Ubi Ave 3
Kaki Bukit Ave 2
Kaki Bukit Road 2
Kaki Bukit Ave 3
Bartley Road East
Kaki Bukit Road 4
Kaki Bukit Road 6
Bartley Road East and back (looping point)
Advantages:
- Connects Tanjong Rhu to Marine Parade (a connection that has been missing for years)
- 15 can be cut short to Eunos with majority DD fleet
- Connects new MRT station of UBI to UBI, Kaki Bukit north industrial estates
- sv 11 gets better utilized due to extension as sv 150 and #11 can be used for another route.
Con
- Connection to Marine Crescent/Terrace removed as route would become winding (alternate option of sv 13 to Eunos MRT still exists).
No need to think so much,Just make 150 ply parkway parade after Telok Kurau and remove S15 from Telok Kurau and straightaway loop at MP..Can utilise a few DDs too.
Originally posted by SMB3163D:979M demand not very good, happened to be at Opp Blk 765 today at 7am and 1.30pm, where the school is nearby..
0715: SMB127D (307) - fully seated with around 15 standing, 10-15 students alighted0720: SG1747K (979M) - around 7-9 pax only, only 3 students alighted0725 at Blk 765 (Twd YT): SMB3117M (307E) - looked fully seated with standing pax(cant really see due to condensation on window), 10-15 students alightwd1320: SMB3131X (307E) - full, still had around 20 students at bus stop after1330: OC500 (307) - cleared all pax at the the bus stop that wanted to board1345: SG1747K (979M) - bus was empty, only 2 students boarded..they should have done these for 979M:- increase frequency (at least 15min) with more buses- call at Yew Tee MRTthoughts?
imo during peak hours observe better, not many students from that school would go to BP from there
Originally posted by SMB3163D:A lot of them transfer to KJ..
Actually can transfer 40 OC500LE to Wldep/Wlbp while the remaining with Kjdep and Amdep.Citaros can stay with Amdep or even with Kjdep.
Originally posted by SMB5007J:imo during peak hours observe better, not many students from that school would go to BP from there
Lol peak hour people rather not wait 30 mins, but i see when i have time to observe peak hour loading
Originally posted by carbikebus:Actually can transfer 40 OC500LE to Wldep/Wlbp while the remaining with Kjdep and Amdep.Citaros can stay with Amdep or even with Kjdep.
Dunno how WLDEP will maintain them though..
Brief observation from Svc 39 DD from Loyang to Yishun at 0630
Upper deck is full from Blk 115 onwards. Only start to empty from Khatib onwards.
Svc 39 KUB caught up at Jln Kayu, also packed to door.
Originally posted by ButIAmAToilet:Brief observation from Svc 39 DD from Loyang to Yishun at 0630
Upper deck is full from Blk 115 onwards. Only start to empty from Khatib onwards.
Svc 39 KUB caught up at Jln Kayu, also packed to door.
Hi mr ButIAmAToilet, just curious to know if you know the timing of departure for the sbs39 KUB? Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by dupdup77:Hi mr ButIAmAToilet, just curious to know if you know the timing of departure for the sbs39 KUB? Cheers. Thanks.
Not exactly sure. I know the DD reach Loyang Ave towards Yishun at 0630 though. It is the bus after this DD.
Originally posted by ButIAmAToilet:Not exactly sure. I know the DD reach Loyang Ave towards Yishun at 0630 though. It is the bus after this DD.
Hi mr ButIAmAToilet, thanks for the info.
Originally posted by Sbs6750E:I cannot understand something.
Why does sv 85 have more DDs than sv 39 when sv 39’s loading is, I think, >> sv 85’s?
I know sv 85 has petential to have high loading in future when occupancy in Sengkang West has rissen.
For the time being, deploying the DDs to other needy services, such as sv 43, which have seen higher loading after the removal of sv 76 from Marine Parade, would be a better decision.
Hi mr sbs6750E, that time before sbs 85 got DDs, they announce that sengkang west MP Dr Lam lobbied hard for it. At that time, there was only sbs 85 along that sector and it was single deck some more. The single deck sbs 85 was very crowded during peak hours, being the only service. So DDs for sbs 85 was given. The MP continued to lobby for more bus services for his estate and LTA provides for another new service sbs 102 and also opened kupang LRT station for revenue service. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by Sbs6750E:I cannot understand something.
Why does sv 85 have more DDs than sv 39 when sv 39’s loading is, I think, >> sv 85’s?
I know sv 85 has petential to have high loading in future when occupancy in Sengkang West has rissen.
For the time being, deploying the DDs to other needy services, such as sv 43, which have seen higher loading after the removal of sv 76 from Marine Parade, would be a better decision.
Maybe u should go see the loading of sv85 between 5pm n 6pm from yishun.
Daily situation for years yet nothing has been done by LTA and SBST. 103 is a BSEP service some more. Always packed from West Camp to YCK Rd where ppl cant board
Originally posted by SBS6853S:
Daily situation for years yet nothing has been done by LTA and SBST. 103 is a BSEP service some more. Always packed from West Camp to YCK Rd where ppl cant board