Service Frequency, Run time & time between Destinations
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
I managed to peek at one of 117 AP duty.Although it originate from Punggol but the rest time is an average of 6 mins only compared at Sembawang where rest time is around 11-22 mins.The paid mealbreak also at Sembawang.Maybe Punggol is too packed with buses.
At times can see 3 117 buses parked side by side at Sembawang and it felt like the rest time there is almost the same time as a normal meal break for BC
-
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
At times can see 3 117 buses parked side by side at Sembawang and it felt like the rest time there is almost the same time as a normal meal break for BC
It is because 117 does not have rest time at Punggol. Just around 10-14 mins till the next bus comes in.
-
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
At times can see 3 117 buses parked side by side at Sembawang and it felt like the rest time there is almost the same time as a normal meal break for BC
117 & 118 most meal times at Sembawang and Business Park respectively.
-
911 is suffering form multiple isntances of triple bunching, sometimes even simultaneously, on WEEKENDS. I have nothing more to say about this incompetency of all involved.
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
911 is suffering form multiple isntances of triple bunching, sometimes even simultaneously, on WEEKENDS. I have nothing more to say about this incompetency of all involved.
SMRT scared pax cannot board thats why they deploy back to back because lacking of WAB bendies..
-
Just now saw 4 buses inside St 82, 2 going out to Ave 4, 2 going in twds St 81. Frequency less than 5 mins apart
-
5 minutes ago: Spotted 3 Service 913 A22s bunched up from Woodlands Checkpoint towards WTBI ... Reason? Because of passengers from Johor ...
-
As for 912.. Didn't really saw any massive bunching for today..
The most was 2 bendy/rigid buses bunching together..
WAB quota: Passed
9 / 14 WAB buses (assuming the other 1 is NWAB)
219Y 286C 1143Y 1166G 1179U 1185B 1382B 1396L 1403A 3093Y 3116R 8023S 8024P +1 more -
SMRT should take away A24s from 971E, 854 and 188. It should strictly use the WAB bendies for feeders/intratowns. Isn't that simple logic that SMRT should understand???
If register DDs sooner, can have those on trunk services rather than have A24s.
-
Frequency of some Hougang services as observed during AM & PM peak
112 - 10/12 mins
113 - 18/25 mins (not counting 113A)
115 - 12/15 mins
116 - 10/14 mins
119 - 15/18 mins
* None of the services have a great (<10 min) frequency.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
SMRT should take away A24s from 971E, 854 and 188. It should strictly use the WAB bendies for feeders/intratowns. Isn't that simple logic that SMRT should understand???
If register DDs sooner, can have those on trunk services rather than have A24s.
188 only has 1 perm A24 (8033M), it should be deployed to 302 and exchanged with a Habit at least.
302 keep having WAB quota failure..
And 971E A24 should be used for 858 or some other feeders, dunno why they deploy until liddat
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
Frequency of some Hougang services as observed during AM & PM peak
112 - 10/12 mins
113 - 18/25 mins (not counting 113A)
115 - 12/15 mins
116 - 10/14 mins
119 - 15/18 mins
* None of the services have a great (<10 min) frequency.
So what is the big deal??? Their initial frequency given by Sbs transit is similar what. If sbs frequency already greater than 10 min, how to have consistently < 10 min when you observed? Hahaha. What a joke. Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
So what is the big deal??? Their initial frequency given by Sbs transit is similar what. If sbs frequency already greater than 10 min, how to have consistently < 10 min when you observed? Hahaha. What a joke. Cheers. Thanks.
Lol. Pathlight and YOU are the biggest CURSE and JOKE to this forum. Never any valuable input, just criticise others. Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
So what is the big deal??? Their initial frequency given by Sbs transit is similar what. If sbs frequency already greater than 10 min, how to have consistently < 10 min when you observed? Hahaha. What a joke. Cheers. Thanks.
I was correct. Your posts always contradict. I thought you said you only criticise to defend yourself??
What did he do to attack you now?
You the Ministry of Internet is it?
-
I am sorry, I have to intervene here.
Please stop what you are doing.
What you are doing now is only going to cause hurt.
You do not have to resort to personal attacks, to get your point across.
It does not feel good, right?
So what for hurl negative remarks on one another?
If you have any problem, just say.
You can always voice your opinions in a nice manner.
To the Moderators of SGforums,
With regards to the incident of personal attacks in this forum, I would like to recommend that you either black-list or ban the user who started this attack.
No hate or whatever, but I would appreciate if you could at least give a nice warning to the user of concern.
No one is against any one. We all want to pursue our common interest, in a nice environment that is happy and calm.
I have heard good things about the moderators of SGforums, that you care for the welfare of the participants and ensure peace and stability in the forum, that the participants respect you as the authority.
Please do your job of moderating the forum, to maintain law and order.
Thanks.
-
Originally posted by gekpohboy:
I am sorry, I have to intervene here.
Please stop what you are doing.
What you are doing now is only going to cause hurt.
You do not have to resort to personal attacks, to get your point across.
It does not feel good, right?
So what for hurl negative remarks on one another?
If you have any problem, just say.
You can always voice your opinions in a nice manner.
To the Moderators of SGforums,
With regards to the incident of personal attacks in this forum, I would like to recommend that you either black-list or ban the user who started this attack.
No hate or whatever, but I would appreciate if you could at least give a nice warning to the user of concern.
No one is against any one. We all want to pursue our common interest, in a nice environment that is happy and calm.
I have heard good things about the moderators of SGforums, that you care for the welfare of the participants and ensure peace and stability in the forum, that the participants respect you as the authority.
Please do your job of moderating the forum, to maintain law and order.
Thanks.
Nobody cares. You're assisting in this by intervening in this matter.
Don't feed the trolls. Thanks.
Some frequencies of bus services I've observed during weekdays peak hours.
50 Bishan: AM
10 - 13 minutes
Frequent bunching, with some 22 minutes headway between groups.58 Bishan: PM
6 - 13 minutes. Kinda disappointing that the bus after 13 minutes wait is an SD while DDs have a headway of 6 minutes.70 Yio Chu Kang: PM
9 - 13 minutes, with some buses doing B07*.
78 Jurong East: PM
4 - 9 minutes, doing well.
106 Shenton Way: PM
10 - 15 minutes, but fresh buses should be supplemented to Shenton Way so the frequency on the opposite direction isn't this bad.
173 Bukit Batok: PM
13 - 15 minutes, god bless you.That's all I'm going to share.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
Lol. Pathlight and YOU are the biggest CURSE and JOKE to this forum. Never any valuable input, just criticise others. Cheers. Thanks.
Hi mr busanalyser, yoy started it first yesterday and you did not even apologize. So you started to feel the pinch after people shoot you. You are the biggest curse and joke to this forum. Never give any valuable input. Just criticise others. If you cannot take such things here, so be it. Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by ihateu853:
I was correct. Your posts always contradict. I thought you said you only criticise to defend yourself??
What did he do to attack you now?
You the Ministry of Internet is it?
Hi mr ihateu853, please check carefully. He started it first yesterday. All I do was to strike back. Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by gekpohboy:
I am sorry, I have to intervene here.
Please stop what you are doing.
What you are doing now is only going to cause hurt.
You do not have to resort to personal attacks, to get your point across.
It does not feel good, right?
So what for hurl negative remarks on one another?
If you have any problem, just say.
You can always voice your opinions in a nice manner.
To the Moderators of SGforums,
With regards to the incident of personal attacks in this forum, I would like to recommend that you either black-list or ban the user who started this attack.
No hate or whatever, but I would appreciate if you could at least give a nice warning to the user of concern.
No one is against any one. We all want to pursue our common interest, in a nice environment that is happy and calm.
I have heard good things about the moderators of SGforums, that you care for the welfare of the participants and ensure peace and stability in the forum, that the participants respect you as the authority.
Please do your job of moderating the forum, to maintain law and order.
Thanks.
Hi mr gekpohboy, yes you are right. Please ban busanalyser. He started all these yesterday and was allowed to go Scot-free again. Previously he also did that and he apologized to me separately in email. I cannot believe why people who started wars and flaming and insults are allowed to be let off again and again. Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr busanalyser, yoy started it first yesterday and you did not even apologize. So you started to feel the pinch after people shoot you. You are the biggest curse and joke to this forum. Never give any valuable input. Just criticise others. If you cannot take such things here, so be it. Cheers. Thanks.
Troll.. LOL
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
Troll.. LOL
Hi mr busanalyser, forget it. I got more important things to do in life. Let bygones be bygones. Shake hand settle amicably, will you? Cheers. Thanks.
-
Originally posted by dupdup77:
Hi mr busanalyser, yoy started it first yesterday and you did not even apologize. So you started to feel the pinch after people shoot you. You are the biggest curse and joke to this forum. Never give any valuable input. Just criticise others. If you cannot take such things here, so be it. Cheers. Thanks.
LOL this is the most riduclous, really, the most riduclous!! Check back the Route Suggestions thread, no, check back your posts and if you are not blind, you should see that you are ALWAYS asking for trouble by criticising opinions. Want screenshots? No problem!! Unless you edit them right away and that would show how you are.
And LOL. "All I do was to strike back", click the previous page, your last post was on 24 March, don't tell me BusAnalyzer shot your 2 months old post on 2 May!
-
Originally posted by ihateu853:
LOL this is the most riduclous, really, the most riduclous!! Check back the Route Suggestions thread, no, check back your posts and if you are not blind, you should see that you are ALWAYS asking for trouble by criticising opinions. Want screenshots? No problem!! Unless you edit them right away and that would show how you are.
And LOL. "All I do was to strike back", click the previous page, your last post was on 24 March, don't tell me BusAnalyzer shot your 2 months old post on 2 May!
Hi mr ihate853, you can continue with your tirade. Everybody knows you create a new nickname just to pick on me. So no matter what I say, you will be there to nitpick on it. I know my conscience is clear. The facts are there for all to see. Already let bygones be bygones. Cheers and good luck in your future endeavours. No point talking to somebody who creates such a nickname as a false pretense on the front. Cheers. Thanks. Goodbye.
-
167:Peak hours from 12-18 mins during peak hours and 13-23 mins during off peak..Obviously need 1 more duty from Amdep to start from BTM during weekdays and need 3 SD--DD coversion from Wldep..
-
Sv 11: 13-17 mins whole day. Sv 27: 2-5 mins during peak hrs including 27A.