Redeployment (Part 22)
-
Originally posted by Yongjunzer:
80 had some bus transfer to arbp
SBS7380H, SBS7381E, SBS7386S & SBS7411C
HGDEP 80 > ARBP 80
4 duties transferred over.
-
Originally posted by TownLink 291:
SBS2X SBS5M
(BNDEP SP
CGBP 291)SBS9411P
(CGBP 291 Awaiting Dereg)
SBS9491H
(CGBP 291 either SP or
awaiting dereg)SE910 9411P
0005M
SE911 9491H 0002XI heard from some people that SBS2X perm on svc 2.
-
Originally posted by SMB5009D:
SBS7380H, SBS7381E, SBS7386S & SBS7411C
HGDEP 80 > ARBP 80
4 duties transferred over.
153 should hand 4 duties to Arbp too.
-
Originally posted by SMB5009D:
SBS7380H, SBS7381E, SBS7386S & SBS7411C
HGDEP 80 > ARBP 80
4 duties transferred over.
Should be clearing some space for 117 and 118.
-
Confirmed redeployment for CCK services
SMB8033M SMB8034K SMB8035H >> KJ 188
SMB1524J >> KJ 300 (fleet downgrade)
SMB1570A, SMB1573S, SMB1574P, SMB1575L, SMB1577G >> KJ 927
SMB3067Z - SMB3073E >> KJ 975
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
153 should hand 4 duties to Arbp too.
174? I really feel it is about time.
eg if 174 last bus ends at 0115 at New Bridge Road the nearest one should be ARBP.
-
Originally posted by SMB31X:
174? I really feel it is about time.
eg if 174 last bus ends at 0115 at New Bridge Road the nearest one should be ARBP.
I also think that Service 153 & Svc 174 should be part of ARBP.
Like that some people will also say Svc 2,12,54,120,121,122 will be part of ARBP... Anyways, I will stick to my opinion that Svc 153 & 174 should be part of ARBP. As for Svc 54,120,121,122 they should be fine with AMDEP
-
Its because Arbp is too small to handle many CBD svc..
-
Originally posted by SMB5009D:
SBS7380H, SBS7381E, SBS7386S & SBS7411C
HGDEP 80 > ARBP 80
4 duties transferred over.
1st time ARBP BCs goes to Sengkang,SLBP i thought already go during 502 times?
-
48-100 also need to partial ARBP. 16 partial BNDEP. Svc like 57 no need ARBP.
-
Originally posted by Sbs6750E:
48-100 also need to partial ARBP. 16 partial BNDEP. Svc like 57 no need ARBP.
Isn't 48 ARBP? I think since it is ending in BNDEP, should be also buses from BNDEP.
Svc 16, Svc 100 I agree to be dual control... Svc 57 was formerly introduced as AMDEP/ARBP control then followed by AMDEP full and now back again. I think just stick to the current.
And I agree that the current ARBP is quite small to hold many buses.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9256 X:
I also think that Service 153 & Svc 174 should be part of ARBP.
Like that some people will also say Svc 2,12,54,120,121,122 will be part of ARBP... Anyways, I will stick to my opinion that Svc 153 & 174 should be part of ARBP. As for Svc 54,120,121,122 they should be fine with AMDEP
Svc 2 and 12 will be better with minority Amdep since these two starts from the East.For 174 it make sense Arbp take a few duties.57 can be full Amdep.
-
80 taking 4 duties only but 117,118 combined HG control buses is more than 4 though, suspect more could be thrown over to other depot
-
Originally posted by SMB42P:
Confirmed redeployment for CCK services
SMB8033M SMB8034K SMB8035H >> KJ 188
SMB1524J >> KJ 300 (fleet downgrade)
SMB1570A, SMB1573S, SMB1574P, SMB1575L, SMB1577G >> KJ 927
SMB3067Z - SMB3073E >> KJ 975
Such a waste to deploy 3 A24s on 188..Show how cock up SMRT deployment is..Can send to Wldep in exchange for 2 or 3 DDs instead.
-
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
80 taking 4 duties only but 117,118 combined HG control buses is more than 4 though, suspect more could be thrown over to other depot
117,118 just for 6 months only la bro..
-
Originally posted by SBS 9256 X:
Isn't 48 ARBP? I think since it is ending in BNDEP, should be also buses from BNDEP.
Svc 16, Svc 100 I agree to be dual control... Svc 57 was formerly introduced as AMDEP/ARBP control then followed by AMDEP full and now back again. I think just stick to the current.
And I agree that the current ARBP is quite small to hold many buses.
48 and 93 should be partially controlled by BNDEP too.
-
Originally posted by swee_heng:
48 and 93 should be partially controlled by BNDEP too.
Yes in order Arbp to take a few of other duties from 16,153,174..
-
Originally posted by SBS 9256 X:
Isn't 48 ARBP? I think since it is ending in BNDEP, should be also buses from BNDEP.
Svc 16, Svc 100 I agree to be dual control... Svc 57 was formerly introduced as AMDEP/ARBP control then followed by AMDEP full and now back again. I think just stick to the current.
And I agree that the current ARBP is quite small to hold many buses.
If I am not wrong, 57 was under full AMDEP for a start. Those CAC MK2s that did 57 were all under AMDEP at that time.
-
SMB8038A
>> AMDEP 811
TIB1218R
>> AMDEP SP -
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
80 taking 4 duties only but 117,118 combined HG control buses is more than 4 though, suspect more could be thrown over to other depot
99 might have more slots controlled by SLBP (ett changed wef today as well)...
believe that the 4 slots of sv80 are doing overnight parking at Harbourfront.....
-
Originally posted by SBS 9256 X:
I also think that Service 153 & Svc 174 should be part of ARBP.
Like that some people will also say Svc 2,12,54,120,121,122 will be part of ARBP... Anyways, I will stick to my opinion that Svc 153 & 174 should be part of ARBP. As for Svc 54,120,121,122 they should be fine with AMDEP
there is no space at ARBP... further ARBP should be closing very soon..(in the next 2-3 years i think).....
and i think someone mention before that 174 have some slots did overnight parking at New Bridge Road?
-
SMB3518P
[WL 969 KJ/BU SP].SMB3519L
[WL 966 KJ/BU SP].SMB3520G SMB3521D
[WL 963 KJ/BU SP].TIB1157H
[KJ 67 WL SP].TIB1158E
[KJ 180 WL SP]. -
Originally posted by TIB1234T:
SMB3520G SMB3521D
[WL 963 KJ/BU
SP].TIB1157H
[KJ 67 WL
SP].Transfer must be for 979/983
-
5898D missing since cameo on 854..
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
5898D missing since cameo on 854..
These few days on 854... Tdy saw it at Yis Int...