Originally posted by jurongresident:Actually, for Bukit Gombak, we can re-route 187 to ply into Bukit Gombak, to provide a bus connection between DTL Bukit Paniang station and Bukit Gombak. This would increase the length of the route by a few hundred metres.
The current route taken by SMRT trunk services in Bukit Gombak is the best solution as it serves a bigger catchment than if it had served the area around the MRT. Otherwise, SBS wouldn't had routed them there if they were to serve Bukit Gombak back in the 1990s.
Originally posted by array88:
Even numerous transfers will not take more than 20 minutes (which is the time wasted on DTL1 - 10 stops from Rochor to Jalan Besar!). Personally I know some people commuting between DTL2 and future DTL3, and they already complain about how windy DTL is. They would probably not prefer a direct route even when DTL3 is in operation.
Hi mr array88, too early to conclude. Once full line is up, people may or may not have different ideas. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by SBS351M:The current route taken by SMRT trunk services in Bukit Gombak is the best solution as it serves a bigger catchment than if it had served the area around the MRT. Otherwise, SBS wouldn't had routed them there if they were to serve Bukit Gombak back in the 1990s.
Perhaps. But there is considerable distance from the blocks bounded between St 31/32/34 to any of the 187 bus stops (if residents were to transfer to DTL). Of course one could transfer via 945, but that adds to the waiting time as well.
I'm hopeful, though. the new estates in BB West are coming up. In time to come, there would be a need for new bus services. By then introducing a BB - BPJ short trunk via West Ave 6/9/4/7 would patch this area enough for 187 to divert to West Ave 5 (or alternatively with their routes swapped) and ensuring the connections to BB Central and BPJ MRT station for both regions.
Originally posted by AJQZC:Perhaps. But there is considerable distance from the blocks bounded between St 31/32/34 to any of the 187 bus stops (if residents were to transfer to DTL). Of course one could transfer via 945, but that adds to the waiting time as well.
I'm hopeful, though. the new estates in BB West are coming up. In time to come, there would be a need for new bus services. By then introducing a BB - BPJ short trunk via West Ave 6/9/4/7 would patch this area enough for 187 to divert to West Ave 5 (or alternatively with their routes swapped) and ensuring the connections to BB Central and BPJ MRT station for both regions.
They had to withdraw 989 (which served Bukit Gombak MRT) 13 years back lor. 2003 was really a year of bus cutting.
Originally posted by AJQZC:Perhaps. But there is considerable distance from the blocks bounded between St 31/32/34 to any of the 187 bus stops (if residents were to transfer to DTL). Of course one could transfer via 945, but that adds to the waiting time as well.
I'm hopeful, though. the new estates in BB West are coming up. In time to come, there would be a need for new bus services. By then introducing a BB - BPJ short trunk via West Ave 6/9/4/7 would patch this area enough for 187 to divert to West Ave 5 (or alternatively with their routes swapped) and ensuring the connections to BB Central and BPJ MRT station for both regions.
Why would you create a new service for the existing 187 route and divert 187 away? You will have more complains diverting 187 away than creating a new service to serve the MRT side. It is never wise to divert a popular service away from its main catchment, especially one which serves as a feeder for much of its route.
Yesterday took 171 from YIS 7.20 to Bukit Timah plaza 8.11. Pax all alight at BPJ, left me till Cashew or Hillview MRT
Originally posted by SBS9252G:Yesterday took 171 from YIS 7.20 to Bukit Timah plaza 8.11. Pax all alight at BPJ, left me till Cashew or Hillview MRT
Option 1:Yishun looping around BPJ estates passing by BPJ Plaza
Option 2:BPJ-YIS
the option to terminate at BPJ ITH is to loop around BPJ MRT/LRT station
171A
(current 171 route from Yishun) > Jelebu Road > Bukit Panjang Road > Upper Bukit Timah Road (DT1 Bukit Panjang) > Petir Road (BP6 Bukit Panjang) > (current 171 route to Yishun)
171 (someone suggested this as extension of 177 to Yishun)
(current 171 route from Yishun) > Bukit Panjang Road > Upper Bukit Timah Road (DT1 Bukit Panjang) > (current 177 route to Bukit Batok)
I'll repeat. The best would be the following.
171: Yishun Interchange <> Lor 1 Geylang Terminal (replacing 961 from Beauty World)
961: Woodlands Interchange <> Beauty World (loop) missing sector covered by DTL2, 170, 170A and 171
867: new service: CCK Interchange <> Beauty World (loop)
67: Tampines Interchange <> Rochor Canal Road (loop).
171 can be withdrawn and 180 extended to Yishun. 77 can be used as partial cover for 171 between Bukit Timah Plaza and Stevens Rd and also converted to a loop service. The missing parts of 77 can be covered by an extended 41.
Other changes can hold off until DTL3 is up and running.
Impossible for 180 to extend till Yishun,LTA wont encourage that for sure..The most 171 is shortened to BPJ.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:I'll repeat. The best would be the following.
171: Yishun Interchange <> Lor 1 Geylang Terminal (replacing 961 from Beauty World)
961: Woodlands Interchange <> Beauty World (loop) missing sector covered by DTL2, 170, 170A and 171
867: new service: CCK Interchange <> Beauty World (loop)
67: Tampines Interchange <> Rochor Canal Road (loop).
please keep 961, the change should be just 171 and maybe splitting 67.
and for CCK new service should be numbered as 98x.
Originally posted by iveco:171 can be withdrawn and 180 extended to Yishun. 77 can be used as partial cover for 171 between Bukit Timah Plaza and Stevens Rd and also converted to a loop service. The missing parts of 77 can be covered by an extended 41.
Other changes can hold off until DTL3 is up and running.
180 and 171 will lose its link to the DTL station
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:I'll repeat. The best would be the following.
171: Yishun Interchange <> Lor 1 Geylang Terminal (replacing 961 from Beauty World)
961: Woodlands Interchange <> Beauty World (loop) missing sector covered by DTL2, 170, 170A and 171
867: new service: CCK Interchange <> Beauty World (loop)
67: Tampines Interchange <> Rochor Canal Road (loop).
961 certainly still has its demand even after DTL2's opening. It's 171 that saw a much reduced passenger demand after the opening of DTL2.
Originally posted by SBS7557R:They had to withdraw 989 (which served Bukit Gombak MRT) 13 years back lor. 2003 was really a year of bus cutting.
Yeah, service 989 was an interesting route back, pity it only last about 22 months in service, remember riding it to airport during those days.
Originally posted by SMB145B:please keep 961, the change should be just 171 and maybe splitting 67.
and for CCK new service should be numbered as 98x.
I think 67 just remain at the moment, maybe till the downtown line 3 opens?
yeah 171 needs to have some route adjustment.
LTA main objective here is to encourage people take PTs,be it those with or without cars.My Uncle is the best example,After his Accord scrap,He buy an Off Peak Car Audi A1..Weekdays to office is Premium svc for him..
Originally posted by carbikebus:Impossible for 180 to extend till Yishun,LTA wont encourage that for sure..The most 171 is shortened to BPJ.
If you looked at my map properly you'd all have noticed that my proposed 171/180 merged entity cuts a rather direct line from north to west. The distance covered is only 25.1km maximum. The changes to 41 & 77 are conditional on the fate of 171, obviously.
There is still demand from Yishun to Mandai/BPJ.180 already stressed with heavy loadings.41 & 77 serve different catchment and will be operated by Tower Transit by the way.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:I'll repeat. The best would be the following.
171: Yishun Interchange <> Lor 1 Geylang Terminal (replacing 961 from Beauty World)
961: Woodlands Interchange <> Beauty World (loop) missing sector covered by DTL2, 170, 170A and 171
867: new service: CCK Interchange <> Beauty World (loop)
67: Tampines Interchange <> Rochor Canal Road (loop).
171's route is already 34km long, and you want to introduce a diversion to make it 7km longer?!
If 171 gets rationalised, diverting it to Clementi via Ave 6 after Beauty World would be quite helpful. Other routes may end up being too duplicative of 176, 178, 184, 961, 970, etc. If merger is feasible/workable, then perhaps 41 or 177.
IMO the one route that should REALLY be improved is 178. Can just split at around Bt Panjang (or alternatively, Bt Batok), run peak-hour HCs between Woodlands and BPJ, then convert 961 to semi-express along Woodlands Rd.
Originally posted by AJQZC:171's route is already 34km long, and you want to introduce a diversion to make it 7km longer?!
If 171 gets rationalised, diverting it to Clementi via Ave 6 after Beauty World would be quite helpful. Other routes may end up being too duplicative of 176, 178, 184, 961, 970, etc. If merger is feasible/workable, then perhaps 41 or 177.
IMO the one route that should REALLY be improved is 178. Can just split at around Bt Panjang (or alternatively, Bt Batok), run peak-hour HCs between Woodlands and BPJ, then convert 961 to semi-express along Woodlands Rd.
It's a no no to divert to Clementi, Clementi has no more space for new service already. 27 parking lots is not even enough to fit in the current services terminating there during peak hours.
67 rigid and 170 still have substantial demand towards CCK/WDL on Sunday nights.
Board DTL today around 6:30pm from Bugis, train alr packed and it's running at 2mins interval. Still, don't think it's needed to rationalise. Quite a no. of ppl alight at Newton & Botanic Garden.
Haven't see the loading of 960, but likely less crowded. Would probably prefer 960 over DTL during peak hours if there's seats available on 960.
I wonder...
Dhoby Ghaut got North East Line & Circle Line
Orchard & Woodlands in the future got the Thomson East Coast Line
Newton got Downtown Line
Bishan got Circle Line
City Hall & Raffles Place got East West Line
CCK got Bukit Panjang LRT
Isn't the North South Line really heavy utilized...
I think Svc 128 should operate full day and then the buses that served along the downtown line should not be rationalized except for 171...
Originally posted by SBS 9256 X:I wonder...
Dhoby Ghaut got North East Line & Circle Line
Orchard & Woodlands in the future got the Thomson East Coast Line
Newton got Downtown Line
Bishan got Circle LineCity Hall & Raffles Place got East West Line
CCK got Bukit Panjang LRTIsn't the North South Line really heavy utilized...
I think Svc 128 should operate full day and then the buses that served along the downtown line should not be rationalized except for 171...
did u see the demand of 128? basically less than 20 paxes per trip after it pass bishan in the morning... off peak, pax can take the NS line....