Originally posted by TIB 585L:Hello autistic fool, i dont care hw special u are in the eyes of the community coz u are slower than the a normal human being but as far as i know, autistic people are smart people but u are just plain stupid and lifeless to be living in the past and anti-rationalization.
Are u anti-LTA, if u are and have the balls, i dare u to take what u say to the LTA and i hope they give a fking talk to the hand reply to u. Even Asperger child and ADHD are more civilised than you
Hi mr TIB 585L, just don't reply to his messages anymore and when he realizes nobody is talking to him, then he will wake up. That is the only way to go. Cheers. Thanks.
If only Mr Path Light knows that the SGforums is only one of the many platforms to play.
I am quite disgusted with the other forum (skyscrapercity), that I asked the moderators there to block me. They probably thought that I am Mr Path Light. Actually, that 'Pioneerboy' is me (Pervertedboy/JurongWestResident/jurongresident). I have read their replies to my latest post, but ... well, I have come to realize that "online forums" are not really for discussion. I just roll my eyes. I do not feel like giving any more f**ks to them.
If Mr Path Light is reading this, I hope he can realise that although this is an online forum, this is not really public. I guess it's only a group of people in real life, who know each other in real life, writing on online forums. That's why it is quite hard for the "outsiders" to really come in.
I hope he can stop wasting his time to entertain the people here. Instead of writing on forums, he may want to watch drama, read book, ... .
Autism is about not able to communicate and behave like the general public. Sadly, writing on forums does NOT help to improve communications, nor behavior. I hope people like Mr Path Light can understand this.
To cure Autism (Communication), the real solution is to interact with real people, in real life.
To cure Autism (Behavior), the real solution is on the parents of the child. I believe the reason why children cannot behave is because their parents never teach. But, of course, if the child knows this, I hope he can take the initiative HIMSELF to improve his own behavior, instead of putting the blame on parents.
Anyway, back to topic.
Anyway, what is the purpose of having this thread?
Reaction is caused by Action.
A bus route or service is changed because there is a reason for doing so.
Usually, it is to improve bus connectivity and bus services. Occasionally, it is due to low demand for the bus route.
With the improvements from changes in bus routes/services, I do not understand why some people want to revert them.
I am sure when there are changes, there is compensation for people who are affected. Otherwise, it would be that there are already alternative routes for them.
Originally posted by iveco:merge 82 and 107. A marriage made in heaven. For all we know the proposed route 117 might be due to such a plan.
You kidding? Extend Service 82 to Shenton Way better
PB, I had tried this but it kind of failed.
I know some of my route is crap but I wanted to improve services.
Originally posted by jurongresident:If only Mr Path Light knows that the SGforums is only one of the many platforms to play.
I am quite disgusted with the other forum (skyscrapercity), that I asked the moderators there to block me. They probably thought that I am Mr Path Light. Actually, that 'Pioneerboy' is me (Pervertedboy/JurongWestResident/jurongresident). I have read their replies to my latest post, but ... well, I have come to realize that "online forums" are not really for discussion. I just roll my eyes. I do not feel like giving any more f**ks to them.
If Mr Path Light is reading this, I hope he can realise that although this is an online forum, this is not really public. I guess it's only a group of people in real life, who know each other in real life, writing on online forums. That's why it is quite hard for the "outsiders" to really come in.
I hope he can stop wasting his time to entertain the people here. Instead of writing on forums, he may want to watch drama, read book, ... .
Autism is about not able to communicate and behave like the general public. Sadly, writing on forums does NOT help to improve communications, nor behavior. I hope people like Mr Path Light can understand this.
To cure Autism (Communication), the real solution is to interact with real people, in real life.
To cure Autism (Behavior), the real solution is on the parents of the child. I believe the reason why children cannot behave is because their parents never teach. But, of course, if the child knows this, I hope he can take the initiative HIMSELF to improve his own behavior, instead of putting the blame on parents.
Anyway, back to topic.
Anyway, what is the purpose of having this thread?
Reaction is caused by Action.
A bus route or service is changed because there is a reason for doing so.
Usually, it is to improve bus connectivity and bus services. Occasionally, it is due to low demand for the bus route.
With the improvements from changes in bus routes/services, I do not understand why some people want to revert them.
I am sure when there are changes, there is compensation for people who are affected. Otherwise, it would be that there are already alternative routes for them.
The thing is, even as you say so, it doesn't really help the guy (unless you happen to know him in real life). In fact he may possibly not be able to comprehend most of what you've said here. Look at his replies, and you can tell.
Anyway, I am quite perplexed about this forum not "being public", because I myself joined in on my own accord, and till date still do not know anyone else on this forum in real life (other than one other forum mate that rarely comes by). I have no idea how many others here can say the same though. I can understand if some members constantly get in touch with each other in real life, but I'm perfectly fine with just interacting on the online platform.
Service 97 should have left behind with Service 62, 81, 82, 106 and 111 to ease the high loading from Service 147
Originally posted by jurongresident:If only Mr Path Light knows that the SGforums is only one of the many platforms to play.
I am quite disgusted with the other forum (skyscrapercity), that I asked the moderators there to block me. They probably thought that I am Mr Path Light. Actually, that 'Pioneerboy' is me (Pervertedboy/JurongWestResident/jurongresident). I have read their replies to my latest post, but ... well, I have come to realize that "online forums" are not really for discussion. I just roll my eyes. I do not feel like giving any more f**ks to them.
If Mr Path Light is reading this, I hope he can realise that although this is an online forum, this is not really public. I guess it's only a group of people in real life, who know each other in real life, writing on online forums. That's why it is quite hard for the "outsiders" to really come in.
I hope he can stop wasting his time to entertain the people here. Instead of writing on forums, he may want to watch drama, read book, ... .
Autism is about not able to communicate and behave like the general public. Sadly, writing on forums does NOT help to improve communications, nor behavior. I hope people like Mr Path Light can understand this.
To cure Autism (Communication), the real solution is to interact with real people, in real life.
To cure Autism (Behavior), the real solution is on the parents of the child. I believe the reason why children cannot behave is because their parents never teach. But, of course, if the child knows this, I hope he can take the initiative HIMSELF to improve his own behavior, instead of putting the blame on parents.
Anyway, back to topic.
Anyway, what is the purpose of having this thread?
Reaction is caused by Action.
A bus route or service is changed because there is a reason for doing so.
Usually, it is to improve bus connectivity and bus services. Occasionally, it is due to low demand for the bus route.
With the improvements from changes in bus routes/services, I do not understand why some people want to revert them.
I am sure when there are changes, there is compensation for people who are affected. Otherwise, it would be that there are already alternative routes for them.
As the thread starter, here are my comments on my original intention of the creation of this thread:
In the past few months, I had been looking through past bus guides and read up on the development of public bus services from the 1960s till today, through SGWiki, some threads in this forum years ago and several visits to the NLB for old bus guides.
This was when I realized that there were several (not all) bus services that benefited the masses and provide good alternatives to the MRT, but were unfortunately being withdrawn or shortened. Thus, I was thinking that other members in the forum would probably feel the same way for certain services, which resulted in the creation of this thread, to discuss whether certain withdrawn services that benefited the masses can be brought back in a slightly modified fashion under the BSEP (which probably will never be the case).
While I do feel that the shortening/withdrawal of several bus services during the NEL Rationalization were probably too harsh, I know that it is impossible to revert back the services to their original forms. Thus, this thread was created with the intent to discuss what can now be done (through the introduction of new routes) to provide comparably fast alternatives to the NEL.
It is most unfortunate that this thread had been "misused" by Path Light in complaining about the reverting of all services cut/withdrawn during the NEL Rationalization. Moreover, not all of the shortened/withdrawn routes during the rationalization were bad; some were good in an effort to really reduce the duplication levels and would have been too slow to compete with the NEL even if retained by LTA.
Therefore, I don't mind if this thread is locked by the mods, since its original intent is now "ruined" by Path Light's constant harping over the past rather than constructive discussion over the above points mentioned. These issues can be better discussed in other threads like "New bus services by LTA/PTOs". Cheers.
Originally posted by SBS7557R:As the thread starter, here are my comments on my original intention of the creation of this thread:
In the past few months, I had been looking through past bus guides and read up on the development of public bus services from the 1960s till today, through SGWiki, some threads in this forum years ago and several visits to the NLB for old bus guides.
This was when I realized that there were several (not all) bus services that benefited the masses and provide good alternatives to the MRT, but were unfortunately being withdrawn or shortened. Thus, I was thinking that other members in the forum would probably feel the same way for certain services, which resulted in the creation of this thread, to discuss whether certain withdrawn services that benefited the masses can be brought back in a slightly modified fashion under the BSEP (which probably will never be the case).
While I do feel that the shortening/withdrawal of several bus services during the NEL Rationalization were probably too harsh, I know that it is impossible to revert back the services to their original forms. Thus, this thread was created with the intent to discuss what can now be done (through the introduction of new routes) to provide comparably fast alternatives to the NEL.
It is most unfortunate that this thread had been "misused" by Path Light in complaining about the reverting of all services cut/withdrawn during the NEL Rationalization. Moreover, not all of the shortened/withdrawn routes during the rationalization were bad; some were good in an effort to really reduce the duplication levels and would have been too slow to compete with the NEL even if retained by LTA.
Therefore, I don't mind if this thread is locked by the mods, since its original intent is now "ruined" by Path Light's constant harping over the past rather than constructive discussion over the above points mentioned. These issues can be better discussed in other threads like "New bus services by LTA/PTOs". Cheers.
Like Service 97 and 502
Originally posted by jurongresident:If only Mr Path Light knows that the SGforums is only one of the many platforms to play.
I am quite disgusted with the other forum (skyscrapercity), that I asked the moderators there to block me. They probably thought that I am Mr Path Light. Actually, that 'Pioneerboy' is me (Pervertedboy/JurongWestResident/jurongresident). I have read their replies to my latest post, but ... well, I have come to realize that "online forums" are not really for discussion. I just roll my eyes. I do not feel like giving any more f**ks to them.
If Mr Path Light is reading this, I hope he can realise that although this is an online forum, this is not really public. I guess it's only a group of people in real life, who know each other in real life, writing on online forums. That's why it is quite hard for the "outsiders" to really come in.
I hope he can stop wasting his time to entertain the people here. Instead of writing on forums, he may want to watch drama, read book, ... .
Autism is about not able to communicate and behave like the general public. Sadly, writing on forums does NOT help to improve communications, nor behavior. I hope people like Mr Path Light can understand this.
To cure Autism (Communication), the real solution is to interact with real people, in real life.
To cure Autism (Behavior), the real solution is on the parents of the child. I believe the reason why children cannot behave is because their parents never teach. But, of course, if the child knows this, I hope he can take the initiative HIMSELF to improve his own behavior, instead of putting the blame on parents.
Anyway, back to topic.
Anyway, what is the purpose of having this thread?
Reaction is caused by Action.
A bus route or service is changed because there is a reason for doing so.
Usually, it is to improve bus connectivity and bus services. Occasionally, it is due to low demand for the bus route.
With the improvements from changes in bus routes/services, I do not understand why some people want to revert them.
I am sure when there are changes, there is compensation for people who are affected. Otherwise, it would be that there are already alternative routes for them.
This is definitely not a forum of insiders. I came here just because I was researching on some random service, and to date I still do not know anyone in the forum personally (even if I know some of their names, I'm not familiar with them), and I dont like to do bus spotting at all unlike many others here. I believe there are many people like me.
Service 81 should ease demand off from Service 147 and loop at Jalan Besar
Either that, we should extend Service 7, 62, 81, 82, 97, 106, 111, 147, 165 and 502
Service 103 should not be cut back to Serangoon from New Bridge Rd so that Mr Path Light can joyride on another service in the NE corridor. You know what I mean.
Service 97 too. Extend back to Hougang
Originally posted by array88:Service 103 should not be cut back to Serangoon from New Bridge Rd so that Mr Path Light can joyride on another service in the NE corridor. You know what I mean.
...
NBR - SER - SAP - YIS
i guess he's happy to have that and joy at the expense of someone.
Originally posted by SMB145B:...
NBR - SER - SAP - YIS
i guess he's happy to have that and joy at the expense of someone.
Okay then
NEL Rationalisation must burn in ashes
Service 103 should extend to New Bridge Road Terminal via Upper Serangoon Road, Bendemeer Road, Lavender Street, Crawford Street, North Bridge Road, South Bridge Road, Neil Road, Cantonment Road and New Bridge Road
107 already extended to Hougang
So Service 103 must extend again to New Bridge Road.
No more bus rationalisation!
Originally posted by dupdup77:Hi mr pathlight, do not think this way. Use Mrt for long routes to save time. Please dont give naive and impractical suggestions again! It only wastes everybody's time here. Cheers. Thanks.
No. On 10 October 2015, I will take 49, 335, 97, 143, 232. No wonder I will go out at 6:18am on 10 October 2015
Originally posted by Path Light:So Service 103 must extend again to New Bridge Road.
No more bus rationalisation!
impossible. 103 is one of the key services of Serangoon group and CANNOT be shifted
Originally posted by SBS2652G:impossible. 103 is one of the key services of Serangoon group and CANNOT be shifted
It will be extended. 106 will also be extended to Serangoon
Originally posted by SBS2652G:impossible. 103 is one of the key services of Serangoon group and CANNOT be shifted
Hi mr SBS2652G, do not continue to engage in any discussions with him. It is just a waste of time. Cheers. Thanks.
Originally posted by array88:Service 103 should not be cut back to Serangoon from New Bridge Rd so that Mr Path Light can joyride on another service in the NE corridor. You know what I mean.
Hi mr array88, do not continue to engage in any discussions with him and do not write in a way to give him any chances to rebutt you. He will not wake up his idea. Cheers. Thanks.