Redeployments (Part 21)
-
SBS6475A
(HGDEP 324
HGDEP 317) fleet add 1SSBS6570H
(HGDEP 324)SBS6343Y
(HGDEP 34) (HGDEP SP)SBS6431B SBS6459Y
(HGDEP 34) (HGDEP 315) fleet add 2S
SBS6571E SBS6572C SBS6573A
(HGDEP 34)SBS3352R
(AMDEP 72) (BNDEP SP) -
Originally posted by SBS8478D:
SBS6475A
(HGDEP 324 HGDEP 317)
fleet add 1SSBS6570H
(HGDEP 324)SBS6343Y
(HGDEP 34) (HGDEP
SP)SBS6431B SBS6459Y
(HGDEP 34) (HGDEP
315) fleet add 2S
SBS6571E SBS6572C SBS6573A
(HGDEP 34)SBS3352R
(AMDEP 72) (BNDEP
SP)Woah, 315 & 317 get fleet adds again. Did some Serangoon residents complained recently or the situation is really that bad..?
-
sure?
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
Woah, 315 & 317 get fleet adds again. Did some Serangoon residents complained recently or the situation is really that bad..?
If I may explain.. there is a serious issue.. coupled with stupid planning.
This is typically what happens for 315... it gets around 45-50 pax from Interchange (those shopping at NEX or wanting to ensure seat take it from interchange). Now there are many who transfer to 315 at stop outside NEX... Bare in mind that if 22/53 have not called before, lot of Boundary road residents also take 315...
So those from Serangoon North 1 are at a big disadvantage because they might not get to board. If you see 315 beyond Boundary road, people can easily board.
Stupid planning because LTA could have just introduced 315A that terminates at last stop of Serangoon North Ave 1 and comes off service back to interchange and starts next trip. 3 DDs on 315A could be deployed for this. Similarly 315 downroute could be operated from North Ave 1 in AM.
I feel bad for residents of North Ave 1 who have only one long winding service to interchange. In AM still okay because they get to board easily. In PM, it is hit or miss. Hence, like stupid buses have been added constantly to 315 instead of having some DDs that would clear the load instead or introducing 315A.
-
As another alternative, 116 should have been routed via Serangoon North Ave 1 as there are many services doing Toho Green sector of YCK road. 116 would have been hugely popular plus the unused capacity on 116 would have been well utilized.
-
Originally posted by SBS8478D:
SBS6475A
(HGDEP 324 HGDEP 317) fleet add 1SSBS6570H
(HGDEP 324)SBS6343Y
(HGDEP 34) (HGDEP SP)SBS6431B SBS6459Y
(HGDEP 34) (HGDEP 315) fleet add 2S
SBS6571E SBS6572C SBS6573A
(HGDEP 34)SBS3352R
(AMDEP 72) (BNDEP SP)Service 315 & 317 converted 2S to 2AP & 1S to 1AP respectively; Hence come the fleet add
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
If I may explain.. there is a serious issue.. coupled with stupid planning.
This is typically what happens for 315... it gets around 45-50 pax from Interchange (those shopping at NEX or wanting to ensure seat take it from interchange). Now there are many who transfer to 315 at stop outside NEX... Bare in mind that if 22/53 have not called before, lot of Boundary road residents also take 315...
So those from Serangoon North 1 are at a big disadvantage because they might not get to board. If you see 315 beyond Boundary road, people can easily board.
Stupid planning because LTA could have just introduced 315A that terminates at last stop of Serangoon North Ave 1 and comes off service back to interchange and starts next trip. 3 DDs on 315A could be deployed for this. Similarly 315 downroute could be operated from North Ave 1 in AM.
I feel bad for residents of North Ave 1 who have only one long winding service to interchange. In AM still okay because they get to board easily. In PM, it is hit or miss. Hence, like stupid buses have been added constantly to 315 instead of having some DDs that would clear the load instead or introducing 315A.
To begin, I shall say everything happen for a reason. As a regular commuter for 315, I would say that your observation is there but 60% only. Boundary Rd pax are not the one adding to the demand. These group of ppl are secondary, cause most pax actually alighted at Serangoon Garden which I would say about 40% of the loading.
Te loading have been increasing since it re-routed to the New Serangoon Int. The loading sector is not purely Serangoon - North Ave 1, but along multiple point of the route, including North Ave 4/5 back to Serangoon.
hence 315A wouldn't solve the problem. Furthermore, DD deployment would not be full utilized even though how I wish it is deployed with DD. To add on, 315 DD is not cleared for DD due to several reason and that's why DD have not been deployed.
In the case of 116, the loading itself is already beyond it's current capacity provision. And the current route is to provide better access from Blk 516 Ang Mo Kio Ave 3 to Serangoon (The lost connection upon amendment of 315 to North Ave 5) , so it would be best to remain untouched.
-
SBS6399L > HGDEP 315
7th BSEP fleet add?
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
Woah, 315 & 317 get fleet adds again. Did some Serangoon residents complained recently or the situation is really that bad..?
SBS6399L spotted for past week already.
-
Originally posted by SBS3004X:
SBS6399L > HGDEP 315
7th BSEP fleet add?
SBS6399L
HG141 - HG315
SBS6529D
HG315 - HG141
For those who are interested ,
BSEP Record for SV315
September 2012 - Add 1 BSEP S (6307C) for Weekdays
September 2014 - Add 2 BSEP S (6476Y & 6477U) for Weekdays
Approx January 2015 - Add 1 x BSEP T shift for Saturdays & Sundays/PHs schedule
February 2015 - Add 1 BSEP S (6529D) for Weekdays; Add 1 x BSEP T shift for Saturdays & Sundays/PH
June 2015 - SBS6529D <> SBS6399L
July 2015:
13th July - Add 2 BSEP S (6431B & 6459Y)
20th July - Convert 2 BSEP S to 2 BSEP AP
27th July - Fleet add of 2 BSEP AP on Saturdays & Sundays/PHs schedule
-
...
-
SMB1517E
(WPDEP 169) to (WPDEP 169//963R)
-
SMB3511H SMB3512E
(WPDEP 850E/969) to (WPDEP 857)
Swap with 2 857 DDS
-
By the way is it true that 27 has 33 buses, 85 has 13 buses.../, and 88 has 32 buses??? All from Sgwiki.
-
SMB340D to SMB343X
(WLDEP 176) to (WLDEP 176//925)
Saturday perm that will x-over to 190 at night
-
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
SMB3511H SMB3512E
(WPDEP 850E/969) to (WPDEP 857)
Swap with 2 857 DDS
Morning still see SMB 3511 H on 850E. Is it WLDEP 857/850E?
-
Originally posted by SBS 9256 X:
Morning still see SMB 3511 H on 850E. Is it WLDEP 857/850E?
Depends on whether later in the same day do you still see the same bus (3511H) on Sv 857? If you see 3511H back on 969, then means the x-over svc for that 850E slot remains the same (Sv 969)
-
Originally posted by Sbs6750E:
By the way is it true that 27 has 33 buses, 85 has 13 buses…/, and 88 has 32 buses??? All from Sgwiki.
Sv 88 should be correct according to frequency..
Sv 85 should have 2 extra SDs still. Someone mentioned that the 4 DDs that went in, should be in exchange for 5 SDs.. Up till now, only confirmed ones running & out of Sv 85 are 2760C, 6608J & 6711T. So there should be at least 1 more SD out of Sv 85 but not detected yet.
Otherwise, this means Sv 85's capacity increased massively (and by that, I mean, 4 DDs vs 3 or 4 SDs).. -
For Sv 85,
6053J - Gillette Fusion ProGlide Shaver (quite new ad)
6054G - CDGE 3D ball full wrap
6248P - Vaseline Spray Moisturisers (quite new ad)
6633K - Nuyou Magazine
6838L - Lipton Milk Tea Latte
6839J - Adless (well, according to what I saw someone posted anyway, former Team RED for SEA Games)So most likely out of Sv 85 should be 6054G & 6839J..but I don't think i've seen people mention them in their cameo posts much recently though..
-
i think 969 have > 6 dd perm
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
Sv 88 should be correct according to frequency..
Sv 85 should have 2 extra SDs still. Someone mentioned that the 4 DDs that went in, should be in exchange for 5 SDs.. Up till now, only confirmed ones running & out of Sv 85 are 2760C, 6608J & 6711T. So there should be at least 1 more SD out of Sv 85 but not detected yet.
Otherwise, this means Sv 85's capacity increased massively (and by that, I mean, 4 DDs vs 3 or 4 SDs)..reduce 5 trips each direction for weekdays for sv85, so should be 5 buses out with 4 DD in.. unless, they convert 1 AP to 1 S, then number of buses out should be 4...
looking at the ETT, seem like that it have 12 buses (provided that there is no jump bus)..
-
SBS3945E
(AMDEP SP AMDEP 72/72B)doing consistently for the past 2 weeks. did not find any perm sticker but guess it is perm (6060/664 and one more citaro also no perm sticker)..
3944 should also be perm Sv72 as well but so far it does 72B once during the last 7 days of service..
SBS5052T SBS8778M
(AMDEP 72/72B AMDEP SP)not spotted on 72B for past 2 weeks
one more KUB (should be 5075) should be out as well (8778 should have been out for some time already)..
13 buses for 72B.
6060/6648/6650/6651/6534/6576/6827/5066/8819
7428/3353/3945 + 1 random DD/SD (should be 3944 slot but usually bus was pull to do 72 instead while another SD will cover 72B instead).
6577 is also consistently on 72/72B without perm sticker..
-
lol... y take only 3352 to BN should also take 3353 along anyway still see 3353 On 72 just now and 3944H .
-
Believe 3931U and 3946C are perm 2 by now. Havent been seeing its perm batch 2 vos of late. 3950P seems to be on 2 also. Saw 9828X once on 31 last week also.
Side note, there seems to be a shuffle in ett timings also.
-
Originally posted by Lsk138:
lol... y take only 3352 to BN should also take 3353 along anyway still see 3353 On 72 just now and 3944H .
3353 still doing 72B everyday....