Redeployments (Part 21)
-
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
66 shld be getting one also, 162 also.
Im not sure about 63,100,33,32.
All these services should get them too, especially 33 and 100... These two services are very crowded throughout the day (even during off-peak). Other two can get split DDs if possible, but I think 33 and 100 should get them first...
Anyway, 135 should also get some DDs... SDs can get crowded like mad along Tanjong Katong Road. 13 needs some upgrades too...
-
Originally posted by 23ispolo:
All these services should get them too, especially 33 and 100... These two services are very crowded throughout the day (even during off-peak). Other two can get split DDs if possible, but I think 33 and 100 should get them first...
Anyway, 135 should also get some DDs... SDs can get crowded like mad along Tanjong Katong Road. 13 needs some upgrades too...
162 i dont get it why havent get DD, in fact never see any DD cameo on it before. 130 can get more if possible.
-
66 can try 4 peak hour DDs,63 i think Rumah Tinggi doesnt allow tri axle vehicle to pass,33 narrow roads along Joo Chiat.32 doesnt need one la,Just add buses and improve runtime should be enough.100 Upper Aljunied low lying branches la dey
-
Haiya if they trim the trees down for 67,960,145,176. They can do so for Depot Rd svc, Upp Aljunied svc.
-
Depot Rd got other fleet restriction beside trees la dey,Upp Aljunied i believe those trees are sacred?National treasure some sort la dey
-
Originally posted by 23ispolo:
All these services should get them too, especially 33 and 100... These two services are very crowded throughout the day (even during off-peak). Other two can get split DDs if possible, but I think 33 and 100 should get them first...
Anyway, 135 should also get some DDs... SDs can get crowded like mad along Tanjong Katong Road. 13 needs some upgrades too...
33 cannot get is becos of Joo Chiat
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
66 can try 4 peak hour DDs,63 i think Rumah Tinggi doesnt allow tri axle vehicle to pass,33 narrow roads along Joo Chiat.32 doesnt need one la,Just add buses and improve runtime should be enough.100 Upper Aljunied low lying branches la dey
32 cannot get cos of margret dr and Clarke Quay that area
-
SBS3936G
[SL SP].SBS3941R
[SL or BN SP]. -
...
-
SBS3939Z >> SL SP (179 today)
-
SMB3585U SMB3586S SMB5048R
[WL SP]. -
SMB3582C
(KJDEP)
on sv67 today -
SBS3928E
either BBDEP or BNDEP SPon sv7 last week.
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
SBS3928E
either BBDEP or BNDEP SPon sv7 last week.
Today on 87.
-
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
66 shld be getting one also, 162 also.
Im not sure about 63,100,33,32.
No need for DDs on 32, 63 or 162. SDs do not get full, why need DDs. 63M supplements the high loading sector very well. infact with too much capacity now. 66 has 64/65, 67/48, 157/174 and multiple other options along its route. So DDs on 66 is a luxury. 33 also doing fine with SDs.
The only service IMO that really needs DDs is 100. The loading is very high between Serangoon and CBD...
-
Originally posted by 23ispolo:
All these services should get them too, especially 33 and 100... These two services are very crowded throughout the day (even during off-peak). Other two can get split DDs if possible, but I think 33 and 100 should get them first...
Anyway, 135 should also get some DDs... SDs can get crowded like mad along Tanjong Katong Road. 13 needs some upgrades too...
100, 135 cannot get DDs on account of Upper Aljunied. To be honest, no need for DDs on 135. You have 43/76 in parallel. 135 may get croweded if comes before 43/76 but people need to be patient, and can get in 2-3 minutes either a 43 or 76 with the latter having majority DDs. 13 doing okay. where the need for DDs?
-
Originally posted by TIB 585L:
162 i dont get it why havent get DD, in fact never see any DD cameo on it before. 130 can get more if possible.
162 where is the need? 130 should get 3 more SD --> DD. 162 most times have max 55-60 pax easily manageable by SDs.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
100, 135 cannot get DDs on account of Upper Aljunied. To be honest, no need for DDs on 135. You have 43/76 in parallel. 135 may get croweded if comes before 43/76 but people need to be patient, and can get in 2-3 minutes either a 43 or 76 with the latter having majority DDs. 13 doing okay. where the need for DDs?
upper aljunied rd no issue with DDs mah.. got DD passby there during road diversion.. and very soon, a new road will replace upper aljunied road..
-
SMB5049M
[WL SP]. -
Service 43/M off peak DDs loading is terrible. They can even come in bunches of threes and only the first one reaches DD-worthy loading.
-
even saw off svc DD passing by upper aljunied rd b4 .
-
So what is stopping SBST to deploy DDs on Svc 100 then?
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
So what is stopping SBST to deploy DDs on Svc 100 then?
Where will the KUBs and Citaros go?
-
just up to HG depot want to deploy DDs to 100 anot
just like sv 145 suddenly pop up DDs -
Originally posted by Lsk138:
just up to HG depot want to deploy DDs to 100 anot
just like sv 145 suddenly pop up
DDs 145 deployment was stuck coz of Henderson road low hanging branches that were pruned to accommodate 176. So hence 145 can get DDs now.
For 100, I asked SBST and they said it is on account of Upper Aljunied trees and branches. I think duroing diversion BCs might be given specific instruction to drive in rightmost lane to avoid trees.