Redeployments (Part 21)
-
Time for a new thread.
TIB765J
(AMDEP SP)
(awaiting lay up/deregistration)TIB776C
(AMDEP 67) (awaiting lay up/deregistration) -
TIB816X's deployment as a 169 bus is not even valid at all. Use your brains and think whether or not a bus with a month left will be deployed, because I believe the dispatchers will want a longer replacement than this.
SMB1550H is 178 bus replacing 494R, 1551E is S201 perm replacing 491Z
-
I tot 1480 is S201 replacing 478
-
SBS1688K
(HGDEP 84)
(awaiting lay up/deregistration) -
Originally posted by SMB31X:
TIB816X's deployment as a 169 bus is not even valid at all. Use your brains and think whether or not a bus with a month left will be deployed, because I believe the dispatchers will want a longer replacement than this.
SMB1550H is 178 bus replacing 494R, 1551E is S201 perm replacing 491Z
Mr SMB31X, if you believe 816X is not perm Sv 169 currently, then may I suggest you provide a possible replacement that you see consistently recently then?
Otherwise, what your post just contain are just assumptions. It doesn't help when you seemed to imply other people have no brains to think, when your post also contained nothing constructive but hot air it seems?
I still see 816X consistently on Sv 169 over the past 2 weeks though. Which although I agree with you that it wouldn't be perm in the long term, it's still possible for them to use it as a short-term replacement before whichever MAN / Enviro can be found.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
Mr SMB31X, if you believe 816X is not perm Sv 169 currently, then may I suggest you provide a possible replacement that you see consistently recently then?
Otherwise, what your post just contain are just assumptions. It doesn't help when you seemed to imply other people have no brains to think, when your post also contained nothing constructive but hot air it seems?
I still see 816X consistently on Sv 169 over the past 2 weeks though. Which although I agree with you that it wouldn't be perm in the long term, it's still possible for them to use it as a short-term replacement before whichever MAN / Enviro can be found.
i also see 816X very frequently on 169
-
Service 187 is now under WPDEP (WLBP)... Saw 187TQ05 Sunday timesheet today (SMB247R), says that it is effective since 4 January (last Sunday). Not sure which service(s) went to WLDEP in exchange for 187 to go to WPDEP...
-
Originally posted by TIB1112L:
SBS1688K
(HGDEP 84) (awaiting
lay up/deregistration)No point saying that it is awaiting lay-up when it is just a day away from de-registration.
-
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
Time for a new thread.
TIB765J
(AMDEP SP) (awaiting lay
up/deregistration)As above. (See quoted post above)
-
Originally posted by SBS7557R:
As above. (See quoted post above)
I do suspect that TIB765J has actually been in the lay up corner for as long as TIB774H (not just one day), since both of them already have their logos blackened...
-
add on : SBS 6822G
HGbus on 103 today
-
Originally posted by SMB31X:
TIB816X's deployment as a 169 bus is not even valid at all. Use your brains and think whether or not a bus with a month left will be deployed, because I believe the dispatchers will want a longer replacement than this.
SMB1550H is 178 bus replacing 494R, 1551E is S201 perm replacing 491Z
It's totally similar to TIB528C's case.
TIB816X was just a temporary WLDEP Spare bus, appearing on 911, 912, 962, etc., back then when the POSB HDB Loan advertisement is still being intact.
After that advertisement was removed, it has been appearing back to 169 again.
Anything regarding my edits on SgWiki, please just shoot to me. I am alright with it. Humans make mistakes too. -
Originally posted by 23ispolo:
Service 187 is now under WPDEP (WLBP)... Saw 187TQ05 Sunday timesheet today (SMB247R), says that it is effective since 4 January (last Sunday). Not sure which service(s) went to WLDEP in exchange for 187 to go to WPDEP...
It's just a WPDEP controlled service on Sundays only..
-
Originally posted by SMB315C:
It's just a WPDEP controlled service on Sundays only..
Are you sure? I don't think they will push it to WPDEP just for Sundays... It doesn't make sense to let it be under WPDEP for one day while being under WLDEP for the rest of the week.
-
Originally posted by 23ispolo:
Are you sure? I don't think they will push it to WPDEP just for Sundays... It doesn't make sense to let it be under WPDEP for one day while being under WLDEP for the rest of the week.
It's totally the same whereby 912 was WPDEP controlled during Sundays for only one month..
But shall see the other 187 duty sheets tomorrow to double confirm :) -
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
Mr SMB31X, if you believe 816X is not perm Sv 169 currently, then may I suggest you provide a possible replacement that you see consistently recently then?
Otherwise, what your post just contain are just assumptions. It doesn't help when you seemed to imply other people have no brains to think, when your post also contained nothing constructive but hot air it seems?
I still see 816X consistently on Sv 169 over the past 2 weeks though. Which although I agree with you that it wouldn't be perm in the long term, it's still possible for them to use it as a short-term replacement before whichever MAN / Enviro can be found.
First off, I am sorry if I come across as unreasonable picky or bossy or whatever the reason may be, but right now the best option is to wait til all the buses are de-registered before we find a replacement, No point to observe until 3 weeks and yet the last couple of weeks it is being kept inside only for it not to be deployed.
Secondly at this rate the deregistration of the buses are going and the coming in of the new MAN buses, It might not be wise to use the buses that are about to go and they might keep the bus earlier than expected ever since the plan to extend the buses that are registered in late second half of 1995 backfired because of the incoming MANs that are registered faster than expected and I don't really wish to see all of your time and efforts wasted (especially people who made an effort finding the replacements)for redeployments, considering most of you are regulars observing 169 well, alot has changed ever since 169 moved to WLDEP and right now everything is in an absolute mess (since most buses are about to go and the extension backfired.)
Ever since in late 2012 when the scanias are de-registered, everything seems to be getting out of hand in terms of fleet deployments and the fleet management has totally been messed up (notice when 961 went WAB, TIB490B TIB491Z TIB494R went and did 178, they extended the early'95 - 3Q 95 MB buses by half a year and it went on to the CACs but it back fired for the october 95 - Jan '96 MB buses only for them to go because the MANs are coming in fast, and buses that are about to go might be kept inside the depot not deployed at all for the remaining couple of weeks left.
I'm not commenting on things I haven't seen but I really hope you get my point of why I am keeping 816X out of 169.
-
Originally posted by SMB31X:
First off, I am sorry if I come across as unreasonable picky or bossy or whatever the reason may be, but right now the best option is to wait til all the buses are de-registered before we find a replacement, No point to observe until 3 weeks and yet the last couple of weeks it is being kept inside only for it not to be deployed.
Secondly at this rate the deregistration of the buses are going and the coming in of the new MAN buses, It might not be wise to use the buses that are about to go and they might keep the bus earlier than expected ever since the plan to extend the buses that are registered in late second half of 1995 backfired because of the incoming MANs that are registered faster than expected and I don't really wish to see all of your time and efforts wasted (especially people who made an effort finding the replacements)for redeployments, considering most of you are regulars observing 169 well, alot has changed ever since 169 moved to WLDEP and right now everything is in an absolute mess (since most buses are about to go and the extension backfired.)
Ever since in late 2012 when the scanias are de-registered, everything seems to be getting out of hand in terms of fleet deployments and the fleet management has totally been messed up (notice when 961 went WAB, TIB490B TIB491Z TIB494R went and did 178, they extended the early'95 - 3Q 95 MB buses by half a year and it went on to the CACs but it back fired for the october 95 - Jan '96 MB buses only for them to go because the MANs are coming in fast, and buses that are about to go might be kept inside the depot not deployed at all for the remaining couple of weeks left.
I'm not commenting on things I haven't seen but I really hope you get my point of why I am keeping 816X out of 169.
It's alright.. No need to explain too much.. I get what you mean..
Just pitying those going-to-be-de-registered buses who got redeployed at the "last minute".. -
SMB1570A >> KJ SP/ BU SP (on 172 today)
-
TIB792E is still running.
-
SMB3116R
WLDEP 187 > WLDEP BSEP
Enviro500 debut
-
12/1/2015 SBS 6524 S on 513 today for add BSEP.
-
Wlbp is under Wldep so makes no diff who's controlling who..its unlike Brbp/Arbp where they have their own servicing and refuelling area though theyre under Amdep/Bbdep respectively..Cgbp also a sub bus park for Bndep.
-
wahh my 1688K T.T
-
Originally posted by ears:
12/1/2015
SBS 6524 S on 513 today for add BSEP.
got Citaro add... interesting.
-
187/964
WL > WP
SMB3116R
WL 187 > WL 912