LTA's Bus Service Enhancement Program - BSEP (Part 3)
-
Hahahaha its funny how empty 119 DDs go past when everyone is squeezing on 113 at kovan. :P
I love how SBST fleet adds a DD to 119
-
Originally posted by SBS3004X:
SBS3393Y 119
Is it even necessary to add more double decker buses to 119?
3393 on 119 mre than two weeks... too many spare buses nw anyhow throw...
shld push fwd implementation of nrw HG,PNG svcs...
No, 119 dun nd so many DDs unless extend to HG depot via Defu A 1
-
so many spare buses cannot throw to 113, 153 and 107 meh
idk why they muz throw to 119 when a citaro on this svc dosent get packed
-
I think someone (or specifically, user 'SBS3107H' on Sgwiki) might want to relook into the Sv 109 fleet page on Wiki.
IIRC the new e-tt added 2 new trips per Weekday from each terminal. Which means, one trip per Peak Period isn't it? So idk why '3107H' edited it as a A/P shift add. More likely add one S-shift. Unless someone else has info to prove otherwise? -
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
Hahahaha its funny how empty 119 DDs go past when everyone is squeezing on 113 at kovan. :P
I love how SBST fleet adds a DD to 119
IT is BSEP... and I don't get it.. they give sv 10 Citaros and sv 119 DDs... They dont want to make improvements to sv 27/36 with DDs on SWT 27A/36B but want to give DDs to 119... Even 143M got DDs inspite of being a short and supplementary route to 79/143 that have 90% DD fleet. -
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
IT is BSEP... and I don't get it.. they give sv 10 Citaros and sv 119 DDs... They dont want to make improvements to sv 27/36 with DDs on SWT 27A/36B but want to give DDs to 119... Even 143M got DDs inspite of being a short and supplementary route to 79/143 that have 90% DD fleet.I would say 119's DDs are just for show.
-
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
so many spare buses cannot throw to 113, 153 and 107 meh
idk why they muz throw to 119 when a citaro on this svc dosent get packed
Eh 107 no need... juz nice
-
For the new flats and new citizens also
-
3393Y is on Sv 87 today (15 Jul).
-
Anyway, 3399G is still on Sv 109 today. Same slot as yesterday's, before 3060H during AM Peak towards Changi Village.
-
And, I see that there are certain user(s) here who have been too frustrated with their pet services & posted about their vents onto TRS huh?
http://therealsingapore.com/content/taxpayer-money-wasted-inefficient-allocation-buses-routes
There's only been 2 users over here who have been regularly complaining about the abovementioned services anyway. And then expect no one to know who you / they are? Come, I clap for you.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
And, I see that there are certain user(s) here who have been too frustrated with their pet services & posted about their vents onto TRS huh?
http://therealsingapore.com/content/taxpayer-money-wasted-inefficient-allocation-buses-routes
There's only been 2 users over here who have been regularly complaining about the abovementioned services anyway. And then expect no one to know who you / they are? Come, I clap for you.
Lol... yes not difficult to guess... Is this 5010P or sbst191? -
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
And, I see that there are certain user(s) here who have been too frustrated with their pet services & posted about their vents onto TRS huh?
http://therealsingapore.com/content/taxpayer-money-wasted-inefficient-allocation-buses-routes
There's only been 2 users over here who have been regularly complaining about the abovementioned services anyway. And then expect no one to know who you / they are? Come, I clap for you. Oh my goodness! Whoever tried linking politics to bus routes??? Really no-no. Cheers.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
3393Y is on Sv 87 today (15 Jul).
Maybe cameo... Who has seen another DD cameo on 119?
-
btw also spotted 3310L on 62 today
-
Thanks for thinking so highly of me. If i were the author i would have complained about 115 too. I dont think im the only one who takes 113.
-
Today only 3307 on sv 119. 3310 on sv 62 and 3319 on sv 87. So only 1 DD plying.
-
----- Duplicate post ---
-
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
Thanks for thinking so highly of me. If i were the author i would have complained about 115 too. I dont think im the only one who takes 113.
若�人�知，除�已莫为。
Yeah, alot of people in SG take Sv 113. But somehow, you're the only one who keeps posting over here about Sv 113 & comparing Sv 113 with Sv 119 over the past few pages of this topic. And not to mention the countless other threads you've visited as well. And there in the article, the same comparison is made.
Can't blame alot of us here if our first thought when reading that article is that perhaps the writer is from over here. Hmm.
Either way, I'm not really bothered with knowing who's the writer of that TRS contribution. Just feel that whoever it is that wrote the article, needs to grow up. The world does not revolve only around him / her and his favourite / most-used bus service.
And if it's someone from here (or the bus community at large) that posted that article, then that says alot about how the community has changed, for the worse
-
The tone in the article is exactly like what some people have posted here
-
Wah seh....But to be fair its quite annoying that another DD added on 119..113 should at least have 2-3 crossover DDs for peak hours..but again there might be other reasons too.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
若�人�知，除�已莫为。
Yeah, alot of people in SG take Sv 113. But somehow, you're the only one who keeps posting over here about Sv 113 & comparing Sv 113 with Sv 119 over the past few pages of this topic. And not to mention the countless other threads you've visited as well. And there in the article, the same comparison is made.
Can't blame alot of us here if our first thought when reading that article is that perhaps the writer is from over here. Hmm.
Either way, I'm not really bothered with knowing who's the writer of that TRS contribution. Just feel that whoever it is that wrote the article, needs to grow up. The world does not revolve only around him / her and his favourite / most-used bus service.
And if it's someone from here (or the bus community at large) that posted that article, then that says alot about how the community has changed, for the worse
I am not surprised. Bus lobbyists are more prevalent and peristent than you think.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
Today only 3307 on sv 119. 3310 on sv 62 and 3319 on sv 87. So only 1 DD plying.
3319?
-
Originally posted by sgbuses:
I am not surprised. Bus lobbyists are more prevalent and peristent than you think.
Hi mr sgbuses, this is typical attitude of bus lobbyists. Some are extremists. Every little thing also must complain. Cheers.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
And, I see that there are certain user(s) here who have been too frustrated with their pet services & posted about their vents onto TRS huh?
http://therealsingapore.com/content/taxpayer-money-wasted-inefficient-allocation-buses-routes
There's only been 2 users over here who have been regularly complaining about the abovementioned services anyway. And then expect no one to know who you / they are? Come, I clap for you.
It's true that BSEP funds have not been well-allocated. Just look at YWT area and you will know. 15 years no improvement. Tsk, tsk.