Redeployments (Part 20)
-
SBS6467Z
(SLBP 194/192*)SBS6471K
(AMDEP 402) -
SMB1452H
(AMDEP SP)
** On 851 today -
SMB3014B
[WLBP 860
AMDEP 860].bus spotted inside AMDEP.. so guess 860 should be transferred back to AMDEP?
-
Should be as 3044P also from Amdep
-
I also don know why 860 Also Need dual control when it piles yishun and khatib area.
-
...
-
Originally posted by ZzCrushX:
I also don know why 860 Also Need dual control when it piles yishun and khatib area.
Won't be surprised if they give back this and 811 to AMDEP... WLDEP flooding with buses, that's why their deployments were quite cui. Even now they gave back their 190 slots to KJDEP... (SMB1356C - SMB1358Y, SMB1419E and SMB1420A were also transfered with this depot change)
-
Originally posted by SBS5111G:
I think 3812E not Sv.81 perm. I still consider all both 3807 n 3812 SP like running ard like SP!
Yep, SBS3807X denfinitely still SP... Only thing is that SBS3812E has been spamming on 10 since Saturday, it was even on the same Weekend slot yesterday (after SBS7660A) today! I think it's either temporarily replacing a perm bus undergoing maintenance or one perm bus kena pushed out...
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
I also doubt sv 58 got both 3383 and 3384... seems like only one of the two... same goes for sv 143... either 3389 or 3390... coz 3389 also often spotted on 243G.
Heard dat now 3393Y & 3411D perm on 50 liao
-
Originally posted by TIB783G:
178's reporting location has changed.
WLBP
WLDEP.New timetables spotted on 178 buses (seen on TIB809S), so 178 go over to WLDEP along with 960 and 962?
-
Originally posted by Lsk138:
Heard dat now 3393Y & 3411D perm on 50 liao
-
Originally posted by 23ispolo:
Won't be surprised if they give back this and 811 to AMDEP... WLDEP flooding with buses, that's why their deployments were quite cui. Even now they gave back their 190 slots to KJDEP... (SMB1356C - SMB1358Y, SMB1419E and SMB1420A were also transfered with this depot change)
The only way Wldep to ease the overcrowding issue is to let BPJ svc like 75 184 700 & the feeders back to Kjdep only then it can control Yishun svc since Amdep so slow in expanding. CCK can partial control between Budep and Kjdep.Yishun feeders and intratown Wldep can kope..while 851 can partial with Budep since Budep to Bt Merah is slightly nearer than Amdep to BTM.853,854 & 857 can full Amdep.852 & 855 can Wldep/Budep.Amdep can take back 169 as a majority controller as well as 965.Amdep can transfer another 5 duties of 969 to Wldep.980 can make majority Wl..in return Amdep can minor control 61,75,171,190,858,960,966 & 970 -
Originally posted by 23ispolo:
New timetables spotted on 178 buses (seen on TIB809S), so 178 go over to WLDEP along with 960 and 962?
deleted
-
Originally posted by 23ispolo:
New timetables spotted on 178 buses (seen on TIB809S), so 178 go over to WLDEP along with 960 and 962?
Its aint going over bro only it doesnt do overnight park at wlbp from now..178 still goes to Wldep to refill,bus wash and do maintenance at Wldep previously. -
SBS3406U to SLBP. On 183 today. Just left jurong east interchange
-
Originally posted by ZzCrushX:
I also don know why 860 Also Need dual control when it piles yishun and khatib area.
Hmm just like 50,141 & 925 distance so short yet need dual control where longer haul svc is single depot controlled..Like svc 8 we can understand that point A is Tampines so if Bndep/Cgbp to Toa Payoh also quite far and this svc require a lot of buses..50 can go full Amdep and 59 Can give 7 duties to Bndep.For 141 can full Brbp while giving a few 88 duties to Bndep.Hgdep can full control 109.So messy sia deployment. -
Originally posted by carbikebus:
Hmm just like 50,141 & 925 distance so short yet need dual control where longer haul svc is single depot controlled..Like svc 8 we can understand that point A is Tampines so if Bndep/Cgbp to Toa Payoh also quite far and this svc require a lot of buses..50 can go full Amdep and 59 Can give 7 duties to Bndep.For 141 can full Brbp while giving a few 88 duties to Bndep.Hgdep can full control 109.So messy sia deployment.Deployment not so easy la.. There must be a reason why they do this.. i am sure they also think about all these aspects of deployment and then decide what is most efficient... From the outside, I agree 59/88 should have few BNDEP duties. 50 can be dual.. but 141 surely should be single depot controled. With the same logic, 109 deployment is correct to have few BNDEP duties. If we want BNDEP to take 88 duties, why would you want to reverse the duties from 109?
-
Simple..Hgdep got more than 530 buses parking while brbp limited to 260 odd buses..Off svc from Hgdep to CV not that far compared to Brbp to Psr.And 109 Bndep only have 3 duties..
-
SBS6479P SBS6481G SBS6482D SBS6484Z
(AMDEP)There are at least 2-3 more new BSEP Citaros parking at AMDEP lay up corner but I can't see their regos clearly...
-
SBS6797X
(AMDEP SP > BRBP SP) -
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
Deployment not so easy la.. There must be a reason why they do this.. i am sure they also think about all these aspects of deployment and then decide what is most efficient... From the outside, I agree 59/88 should have few BNDEP duties. 50 can be dual.. but 141 surely should be single depot controled. With the same logic, 109 deployment is correct to have few BNDEP duties. If we want BNDEP to take 88 duties, why would you want to reverse the duties from 109?
No bro, they never think hard enough...
174 still single ctrl aft so many yrs... Only recently ONP NBR...
They are adverse to change... 55,76,135,155 still ret all the way to AMDEP
When 196 still terminates M Parade, buses ret to BB ev night...
-
8118T out of 14, 6770 replace
8118 doin 175
-
3401 seen a lot on 196
196 striders mostly out, citaros in 6795 is one of them...
-
6182 in 57, 2816 to 16...
-
923>63...
Citaro replaced is on 197...