Capacity Upgrade/Downgrade Reporting on Bus Services
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
I say it MIGHT be from the initial month. But so far it have been on 72 for the past one month.
There are 13 buses on 72B. 4 Citaro 3 kub 2 mk4 2 BSEP wright plus 2 more random DD (one of them usually is 7428)
Then there is 1 bus less for full route 72 as you had 28 buses earlier, and if 13 buses are on 72B, then for full route it would be 27 buses now. Also, have spotted SDs doing full route 72. -
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
Then there is 1 bus less for full route 72 as you had 28 buses earlier, and if 13 buses are on 72B, then for full route it would be 27 buses now. Also, have spotted SDs doing full route 72.Since when there is 41 (28 + 13) earlier? all the while, it is operating at 40 buses (27 being regular 72 Buses)..
previous 72B fleet - 5 citaros, 4 KUB, 2 MK4 plus 3352/3353
current 72B fleet - 4 citaros, 3 KUB, 2 MK 4 plus 3352/3353 plus 2 DDs.
and for 72, 6647 went in and 3349 went in to replace the two DD that are doing 72B.
But then almost all 72B buses will DO FULL TRIP ON 72 either in the moring or afternoon as well.. that why you will see SD on Sv72 as well.and in overall, Sv72 Gain one more DD......
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
sgwiki updates are funny. This afternoon I checked. 3397 was posted to 161, 3399 was posted to 109 and 3393 update for 119 was deleted. Now, 3393 is back on 119 and the updates to 3397/3399 have been deleted while that to 3403 has been added.
Whoever updates sgwiki - please do it consistently. Spotted 372 has a fleet add in the BSEP Citaro page but not on by service page for 372. If you add a bus on one page, please make sure you are consistent by adding it on other pages as well.Also, please make sure your news is confirmed. 3397 was posted to 161 and 3399 to 109. Now both those changes have disappeared. Also, I had spotted sv 73 getting a BSEP Citaro. I don't see that anymore as well.
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
Since when there is 41 (28 + 13) earlier? all the while, it is operating at 40 buses (27 being regular 72 Buses)..
previous 72B fleet - 5 citaros, 4 KUB, 2 MK4 plus 3352/3353
current 72B fleet - 4 citaros, 3 KUB, 2 MK 4 plus 3352/3353 plus 2 DDs.
and for 72, 6647 went in and 3349 went in to replace the two DD that are doing 72B.
But then almost all 72B buses will DO FULL TRIP ON 72 either in the moring or afternoon as well.. that why you will see SD on Sv72 as well.and in overall, Sv72 Gain one more DD......
I think the ite and ploytech there should provide own bus transport for the students during school hours like NUS.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
From sgwiki, 2 BSEP adds for sv 410
1 WEG, 1 Citaro.
I think adding 1 bus was good enough considering during peak there are so many crossovers already managing the load pretty well. Unless those crossovers are going to reduce.
So now 2 perm DDs for sv 410 + crossover 2-3 DDs usual.
i suspect those the crossovers from 53 are cancelled. have not been seeing them alr quite a few times
-
SBS 3397L
161 ?wah ...another BSEP bus added to this svc again !
-
SMB 62G spotted doing sv 599 this morning
no more Bendy bus ? downgrated again
-
Originally posted by Lsk138:
SMB 62G spotted doing sv 599 this morning
no more Bendy bus ? downgrated again
1241Y on Sv 804 this morning though. Might be some link there.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
1241Y on Sv 804 this morning though. Might be some link there.
for what i hv seen when new sv 660 roll out on svc many paxs usually from 599 switch over to take 660 liao and also 599 only serving 1 trip only if im not wrong .
-
Originally posted by Lsk138:
for what i hv seen when new sv 660 roll out on svc many paxs usually from 599 switch over to take 660 liao and also 599 only serving 1 trip only if im not wrong .
Must see how much the fare mah. I will also go take 660 instead of 599.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
Whoever updates sgwiki - please do it consistently. Spotted 372 has a fleet add in the BSEP Citaro page but not on by service page for 372. If you add a bus on one page, please make sure you are consistent by adding it on other pages as well.Also, please make sure your news is confirmed. 3397 was posted to 161 and 3399 to 109. Now both those changes have disappeared. Also, I had spotted sv 73 getting a BSEP Citaro. I don't see that anymore as well.
There are one user who consistently remove/undo other ppl edit in sgwiki. He seem to think that he is the only one with correct information. N a lot of ppl just edit one page but did not edit other pages at all
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
Must see how much the fare mah. I will also go take 660 instead of 599.
Anyway i also dunno the different fare between this 2 svcs . 
sekali later they going to withdraw sv 599 liao
-
904 need another fleet add..
-
Originally posted by Lsk138: Anyway i also dunno the different fare
between this 2 svcs .
sekali later they going to withdraw sv 599 liao
2.13 vs 5.00. Walk a bit to take 660 also worth it lah. If ur house there nearby got 660/599 obvious choice will be 660 mah. The money saved can be used for the return trip
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
2.13 vs 5.00. Walk a bit to take 660 also worth it lah. If ur house there nearby got 660/599 obvious choice will be 660 mah. The money saved can be used for the return trip
haha.... of course i go for 2.13 one if im using this svcs ,sv 660 even hv return trip somemore in the evening while 599 only doing 1 trip in the morning dat all .
-
Originally posted by lemon1974:
There are one user who consistently remove/undo other ppl edit in sgwiki. He seem to think that he is the only one with correct information. N a lot of ppl just edit one page but did not edit other pages at all
This is crazy... again someone has edited 3397/3399/3400 to SP. There is one user who edits this to sv 161/109/69 and another user who deletes it the next day. Very funny games these people play. -
961 nowadays bunching and couple of buses always seen with half full.or worse quarter seated..Now got 30 buses and almost same scenario like 966.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
This is crazy... again someone has edited 3397/3399/3400 to SP. There is one user who edits this to sv 161/109/69 and another user who deletes it the next day. Very funny games these people play.haha... out of this 3 i only see 3399 still doing on 109 till today for 3397 to 161 this few days i seem never see it on 161 .
-
3399G is almost definitely for Sv 109. 4 straight weekdays (including today, 17 Jul) on the same slot during AM Peak at 0720hrs+ along first few stops of PSR Dr 1 towards Loyang.
3399G is before 3060H (which was the first DD slot last time when they started DDs on Sv 109) in fleet sequence for AM Peak. -
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
3399G is almost definitely for Sv 109. 4 straight weekdays (including today, 17 Jul) on the same slot during AM Peak at 0720hrs+ along first few stops of PSR Dr 1 towards Loyang.
3399G is before 3060H (which was the first DD slot last time when they started DDs on Sv 109) in fleet sequence for AM Peak.
What is the DD sequence: Is it 3060H --> 3399G --> SD --> DD --> DD --> SD --> DD?? -
Since when 67 got 39 buses?Roster and duties indicate only 37 buses from both side with KJ control 20 buses..Those extra is probably Outside schedule duty.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
What is the DD sequence: Is it 3060H --> 3399G --> SD --> DD --> DD --> SD --> DD??Nopes. I think you misinterpreted my words. I meant, 3060H's current slot during AM Peak was initially the first DD slot of Sv 109. But now, 3399G slots in front of 3060H during AM Peak.
So, 3060H's slot now is actually currently the 2nd DD slot for Sv 109 during AM Peak to CGV. 3399G is the first DD slot now in fleet sequence.3082U is the next DD after 3060H. But sometimes, 3082U appears either directly as the next bus after 3060H, or the 2nd bus after 3060H (with a SD in between 3060H & 3082U). Happens because of the bunching probs during AM Peak.
I need to double-check where is 3157M in the fleet sequence though. It used to be behind 3082U, but lately I've seen it quite often behind 6076T's slot during AM Peak, which would put it reaching PSR Dr 12 towards CGV at around 0700hrs+, which is about a bus ahead of 3399G's slot. -
How many buses does 63M have now? There were 3 buses before it became BSEP from SBST side during peak. Now, you have 5 BSEP buses dedicated to sv 63M. What about the buses from SBST side? Do they still do 63M or do full route now?
-
Duplicate.
-
Originally posted by SBS 9631X:
Nopes. I think you misinterpreted my words. I meant, 3060H's current slot during AM Peak was initially the first DD slot of Sv 109. But now, 3399G slots in front of 3060H during AM Peak.
So, 3060H's slot now is actually currently the 2nd DD slot for Sv 109 during AM Peak to CGV. 3399G is the first DD slot now in fleet sequence.3082U is the next DD after 3060H. But sometimes, 3082U appears either directly as the next bus after 3060H, or the 2nd bus after 3060H (with a SD in between 3060H & 3082U). Happens because of the bunching probs during AM Peak.
I need to double-check where is 3157M in the fleet sequence though. It used to be behind 3082U, but lately I've seen it quite often behind 6076T's slot during AM Peak, which would put it reaching PSR Dr 12 towards CGV at around 0700hrs+, which is about a bus ahead of 3399G's slot.So where is SBS3139R?