Originally posted by TIB868X:when will smrt start re-deploying bendy buses to feeders since some of them are already replaced by dds on trunks? kick out those random and annoying rigids that are on feeders
already did to some svcs i guess. eg 811 now everyday more than the previous 3 perm bendies
Originally posted by SMB1333T:already did to some svcs i guess. eg 811 now everyday more than the previous 3 perm bendies
it has more than 3 perm bendies since when already.
811 got 4 perm bendy,ever since the transfer of bendy to Wldep it run with 5 bendy minimum
oh psps anw my point still there that 811 nw more bendy then previously
Really meh? That time I took 811, only managed to see 2 bendy[APs ; 1223A & 1189R] running.. :/
Yishun feeder/intra-towns
800 - okay. no need for fleet add. route can be revised.
803 - okay for now. but after st 31, ave 6 BTOs open up in big way, 803 will need fleet add
804 - already bursting out of its capacity. need full fleet bendy, and with ring road, st 41 flats coming up, will need more buses in future or complementary feeder service.
806 - same as 804. need full fleet bendy and more bendy buses
811 - need 3 more SD --> Bendy slot conversion
812 - need full fleet bendy and 2 more A/P
860 - needs full fleet high capacity - 8 buses is okay - but need DDs or bendies (latter unlikely since under LTA)
sv 20 gets fleet add - BSEP DD added - 3436H
Now fleet size is 11 buses. Expected more DDs, but more SD --> DD conversion. Not bad to see fleet add as well considering frequency could be 12-15 mins.
Now need to upgrade 2 more SD slots to DD.
BSEP add or replacement on sv 58?
Earlier 3384 was supposed to be 58 perm but that was a false alarm. Now apparently 3442 is sv 58 perm with perm stix spotted. Fleet add or replacement of earlier BSEP DD?
272 with new BSEP fleet add, timetable ett 15 Dec (today)... Spotted 4 buses on service today, with the new BSEP slot done by SBS6507S. Need to confirm the BSEP fleet add bus...
Crazy la this LTA,end up all jam with buses
Originally posted by 23ispolo:272 with new BSEP fleet add, timetable ett 15 Dec (today)... Spotted 4 buses on service today, with the new BSEP slot done by SBS6507S. Need to confirm the BSEP fleet add bus...
waste!
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:waste!
Not a waste... Improves the frequency of the route and finally a fleet add to the 2 A/P buses and 1 split bus. Cannot imagine how bad the frequency was with only 2 A/P buses previously during off-peak hours!
Below is the list of services I sent to LTA for fleet add from BSEP
5 - DD
9 - DD
20 - DD (added in this round)
26 - SD
30 - DD
32 - SD
38 - SD
51 - DD
73 - SD
81 - DD
83 - SD
101 - DD
125 - DD
130 - DD
142 - SD
181 - DD
185 - DD
197 - DD
242 - SD
249 - DD
252 - DD
255 - DD
257 - DD
268 - SD
334 - DD
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Below is the list of services I sent to LTA for fleet add from BSEP
5 - DD
9 - DD
20 - DD (added in this round)
26 - SD
30 - DD
32 - SD
38 - SD
51 - DD
73 - SD
81 - DD
83 - SD
101 - DD
125 - DD
130 - DD
142 - SD
181 - DD
185 - DD
197 - DD
242 - SD
249 - DD
252 - DD
255 - DD
257 - DD
268 - SD
334 - DD
268 also added in this round
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:BSEP add or replacement on sv 58?
Earlier 3384 was supposed to be 58 perm but that was a false alarm. Now apparently 3442 is sv 58 perm with perm stix spotted. Fleet add or replacement of earlier BSEP DD?
fleet add. there was an ett change since ytd
Originally posted by 23ispolo:272 with new BSEP fleet add, timetable ett 15 Dec (today)... Spotted 4 buses on service today, with the new BSEP slot done by SBS6507S. Need to confirm the BSEP fleet add bus...
6507 perm lor no need cfm anymore if u hv seen on first day
Originally posted by 23ispolo:Not a waste... Improves the frequency of the route and finally a fleet add to the 2 A/P buses and 1 split bus. Cannot imagine how bad the frequency was with only 2 A/P buses previously during off-peak hours!
Improve freq its a must but everytime peak hour bunchings..After 3 buses pass within 5 mins pax complain wait for bus 20 mins..WTH
Svc that need fleet add
61:DD(SS)
77:SD(SS)
167:SD(Amdep AP)
171:SD(SS)
173:SD(AP)
177:SD(SS)
178:SD(AP)
307:SD(AP)
812:SD(2 SS)
852:SD(AP)
855:SD(AP)
927:SD(SS)
980:SD(2 AP)
Svc that need coversion of high capacity buses
67:3 SD to DD/Bendy
106:4 SD to DD
169:5 SD to DD
172:3 SD to DD
176:4 SD to DD
187:6 SD to DD
188:2 SD to DD
189:1 SD to DD/Bendy
190:6 SD to DD
700:3 SD to DD
851:7 SD to DD
854:7 SD to DD
856:3 SD to DD/Bendy
857:4 SD to DD
859:3 SD to Bendy
860:3 SD to Bendy
911:2 SD to Bendy
960:6 SD to DD
963:3 SD to DD
969:6 SD to DD
Svc that need to cut buses
966:Cut 2 SD
268 gets BSEP inspite of 268P. 268P ineffective?
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:268 gets BSEP inspite of 268P. 268P ineffective?
peak loading supposed to be at AMK IND PARK 2, and not 268P sector
Originally posted by TIB1112L:peak loading supposed to be at AMK IND PARK 2, and not 268P sector
During peak hours, the entire route of 268 has massive loading. 268 deserves dds but i think AMDEP has a mental block with giving dds to feeders/intra-towns (only recent exception 410W). Lemon being from AMDEP area might defer in his opinion on this.
268P was not needed at all. Rather 268 full route needed more buses or 268 needs DDs.
If it was BNDEP, you would have seen 261, 268, 269 all have DDs. I think 265 may have some turning issues (but was sufficient trial done?)
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:During peak hours, the entire route of 268 has massive loading. 268 deserves dds but i think AMDEP has a mental block with giving dds to feeders/intra-towns (only recent exception 410W). Lemon being from AMDEP area might defer in his opinion on this.
268P was not needed at all. Rather 268 full route needed more buses or 268 needs DDs.
If it was BNDEP, you would have seen 261, 268, 269 all have DDs. I think 265 may have some turning issues (but was sufficient trial done?)
268P should be amended to start from AMK MRT to ind park 2 and vice versa... from ave 3 to ave 9 there is sv76 running parallel.. .
as for DD wise, maybe due to the roads at ind park 2....
as for sv265, dun think have any issue with the turning issue as sv548 travel part of 265 route as well.
Originally posted by lemon1974:268P should be amended to start from AMK MRT to ind park 2 and vice versa... from ave 3 to ave 9 there is sv76 running parallel.. .
as for DD wise, maybe due to the roads at ind park 2....
as for sv265, dun think have any issue with the turning issue as sv548 travel part of 265 route as well.
IMO roads at ind park 2 are pretty ok for DDs. If you say it is okay for 265 also, then I feel it is AMDEP who does not want to give DDs to its feeders/intra-towns. Otherwise no reason why 261/269 also have none. Just go adding buses, better convert some SD slots to DD.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:During peak hours, the entire route of 268 has massive loading. 268 deserves dds but i think AMDEP has a mental block with giving dds to feeders/intra-towns (only recent exception 410W). Lemon being from AMDEP area might defer in his opinion on this.
268P was not needed at all. Rather 268 full route needed more buses or 268 needs DDs.
If it was BNDEP, you would have seen 261, 268, 269 all have DDs. I think 265 may have some turning issues (but was sufficient trial done?)
265 is fine. is 269 that has turning issues.
410G and 410W each get BSEP add. Citaro for G and WEG for W.
Totally now, sv 410 has 5 BSEP buses added to it.
Huge capacity add for this service :)