Originally posted by SBS3004X:Service 190 got capacity downgrade.
TIB860S (O405G) > TIB829J (O405)
Yea right, go ahead and assume that 829J is replacing 860S. It could be replacing another bus for all you know.
Originally posted by SBS7557R:Yea right, go ahead and assume that 829J is replacing 860S. It could be replacing another bus for all you know.
Yeap, TIB513U went to 106...
Any changes to Sv 3's and Sv 113's fleet?
i think sv45A DDs should be redeployed to the full route. many times along Lor Ah Soo twd Sgoon the upper deck is quite empty but lower deck got several standing pax.
Agreed,DDs for full route and 45A full single decks..Many times ppl dont wanna move upstairs
Originally posted by carbikebus:Agreed,DDs for full route and 45A full single decks..Many times ppl dont wanna move upstairs
Yes 45A can do with SD. But if you see 45A does get 75-80 pax during its alloted timings. Around 20 pax go to the upper deck coz of which 55-60 pax can be on the lower deck.
The first stop at Lor Ah Soo gets 45 pax or so in 45A (observed 2-3 times specially for 45A). 53/53A comes mostly already standing from HG Ave 1... leaving not much space during AM crash load.
This could be the reason why 45A still has DD.
Aiya 40-45 paxs wouldnt die if the balance is standing mah,afterall its only a SWT
Originally posted by 23ispolo:Yeap, TIB513U went to 106...
have a feeling 513U replacement is 829J while 860S replacement is 895S..but i cant really confirm..as u guys know..190 is so hard to observe...from what i see, now the buses also dun really follow the exact timesheet (meaning buses not sticky with timecard)...
Originally posted by SMB42P:have a feeling 513U replacement is 829J while 860S replacement is 895S..but i cant really confirm..as u guys know..190 is so hard to observe...from what i see, now the buses also dun really follow the exact timesheet (meaning buses not sticky with timecard)...
SGWiki already go put TIB829J as perm liao... TIB895S almost never seen on 176 at all though.
Originally posted by 23ispolo:SGWiki already go put TIB829J as perm liao... TIB895S almost never seen on 176 at all though.
I will see it on 190 almost everyday at different times of the day..see my cameo list and u will observe..
and i have a feeling 1420A is out of 190..anyone spotted it on 190?
Originally posted by SMB42P:
I will see it on 190 almost everyday at different times of the day..see my cameo list and u will observe..and i have a feeling 1420A is out of 190..anyone spotted it on 190?
I doubt the former WLDEP MANs are perm 190 currently.
Originally posted by TIB 585L:I doubt the former WLDEP MANs are perm 190 currently.
1356C, 1357A, 1358Y and 1419E still can be seen on 190 quite regularly, especially 1356 and 1357.
Originally posted by SMB42P:1356C, 1357A, 1358Y and 1419E still can be seen on 190 quite regularly, especially 1356 and 1357.
SMB1358Y still on 190 today...
Originally posted by 23ispolo:SMB1358Y still on 190 today...
yup! the only ex WL MAN not seen on 190 regularly is 1420A. The last time i saw was on 188 last wednesday (011014)
Another observation is that 1042E and 1072T seem to be back...are they on 190 today?
Originally posted by SMB42P:yup! the only ex WL MAN not seen on 190 regularly is 1420A. The last time i saw was on 188 last wednesday (011014)
Another observation is that 1042E and 1072T seem to be back...are they on 190 today?
Sorry, I didn't see the two bendies... I've been seeing SMB1420A on 188 a couple of times recently. And to be honest, 190 is still under partial WLBP control. Spotted a ex-JB Hispano O405 on 190 today...
Originally posted by 23ispolo:Sorry, I didn't see the two bendies... I've been seeing SMB1420A on 188 a couple of times recently. And to be honest, 190 is still under partial WLBP control. Spotted a ex-JB Hispano O405 on 190 today...
It could have been a pull-over on 190 part as there is 0 WLDEP cameos on 190 ever since KJ take back their duties
Originally posted by 23ispolo:Sorry, I didn't see the two bendies... I've been seeing SMB1420A on 188 a couple of times recently. And to be honest, 190 is still under partial WLBP control. Spotted a ex-JB Hispano O405 on 190 today...
Haha its ok. Cos i spotted both of them at least twice within the last few days. Personally i didnt see any yet though i saw many users here posting WLBP buses that are still on 190 (or crossover from 925). The only instance i saw was SMB1443J on a Saturday and this bus was subsequently spotted on 927 on the following Monday.
But 190 also weird..some duties have the old timesheets, some duties have the new timesheets..not consistent.
Will need to observe closely on 190 liao..
Originally posted by TIB 585L:It could have been a pull-over on 190 part as there is 0 WLDEP cameos on 190 ever since KJ take back their duties
I did hear that SMB328R did 190 and I saw SMB1425L appear once on 190 too, both after the transfer...
Originally posted by TIB 585L:It could have been a pull-over on 190 part as there is 0 WLDEP cameos on 190 ever since KJ take back their duties
likely. but there were a few users who spotted WL buses..could be epull though given the inconsistency on the traffic part for 190
Originally posted by SMB42P:
likely. but there were a few users who spotted WL buses..could be epull though given the inconsistency on the traffic part for 190
190 passed by BPJ wich is mainly controlled by WLDEP buses so the chance of any BPJ or WRI svc to epull to 190 is high so there will always be a possibility of WLDEP bus on 190.
Originally posted by carbikebus:Aiya 40-45 paxs wouldnt die if the balance is standing mah,afterall its only a SWT
Yes I would also prefer 45A getting KUB while the WEG does full route.
51 need full DDs,166 loadings now decrease.70 also need majority DDs
Originally posted by carbikebus:51 need full DDs,166 loadings now decrease.70 also need majority DDs
74 should have full DDs also. Freaking crowded bus
74 problem we mostly knew already,School bus svc..Which is they dont really care..Already feedback so many time but still got 7-8 SDs deploy..As long freq is acceptable its ok
Originally posted by carbikebus:74 problem we mostly knew already,School bus svc..Which is they dont really care..Already feedback so many time but still got 7-8 SDs deploy..As long freq is acceptable its ok
Yes but 74 between Marymount and Hougang is not school service.. yet can have 90+ pax during peak hours. 179 is also school service yet full fleet DD... I don't get the school service logic.. hopefully someone in sBST can explain.