Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:People have really started bullshitting on sgwiki
3384Z was posted to sv 58 (was never perm). It is sv 50 perm.
3389K was posted to sv 143 (was never perm). Now shows sv 243G
3390E was posted to sv 143 (was never perm). Now shows sv 243W
In addition 3398J is posted to sv 243G as well.
3411D was posted to sv 72 (was never perm). It is sv 50 perm.
** Please do not post incorrect information on sgwiki unless you are really sure
** I am 100% sure both 3389K and 3398J cannot be 243G. It will be one of the two. The other is SP.
3411? Tot u r the one who say that it is perm and Sv72 gotten 2 BSEP DD this time round?
Originally posted by SBS5010P:ytd 113's loading full till ppl kena kiap by front door bc and pax quarrel
LTA can give so many bus svcs BSEP still not giving 113 BSEP waiting for disaster to happen hahaha
only yesterday ah? last week, i observe for 2 evening from 6-7 pm and none of the buses from Kovan are full..
Originally posted by lemon1974:3411? Tot u r the one who say that it is perm and Sv72 gotten 2 BSEP DD this time round?
That was when it was posted on sgwiki... and yes it did sv 72.. but I was not the one to post on sgwiki.. don't even have an account there.
Originally posted by lemon1974:only yesterday ah? last week, i observe for 2 evening from 6-7 pm and none of the buses from Kovan are full..
Originally posted by carbikebus:
No wonder cannot get add bus...
That's what I have also kept saying with all my observation.. people prefer to go to Serangoon and take 45/53 instead... 113 loading has dropped a lot in the last few months.. i have observed between 6.30-7.30 pm, only 25-30 pax boarding 113A... and if 113 comes behind... goes empty...
You think when LTA can give BSEP to 115/42 it would not to 113 if it needed as much as 5010P says.. ofcourse it would have given.
I agree with 5010P that 113 frequency is bad.. but that is because LTA/SBST considers it as a backup service as loading is poor.
Originally posted by SBS5010P:ytd 113's loading full till ppl kena kiap by front door bc and pax quarrel
LTA can give so many bus svcs BSEP still not giving 113 BSEP waiting for disaster to happen hahaha
Err dude. Not trying to criticise you, but you do know any fleet add will do too right? Idk why but it seems to me from your post that you're only obsessed with getting BSEP-specifc fleet adds.
I think alot of people have started to neglect the existence of normal fleet adds ever since LTA started the BSEP scheme. Everytime I see someone post a e-tt change with new slots, they tend to imply in the posts that the new slots have to be done by BSEP fleet adds.
Well yeah, it's true that most of the fleet adds nowadays are BSEP ones, but there are some svcs which will get non-BSEP (but stil WAB) fleet adds~
Originally posted by ButIAmAToilet:They trying max out the no. of trips for the 518 DD, I supposed. It needs to reach back in time to start its last trip (or downrun). IIRC, it is either the third or second last bus to reach Pasir Ris Int (seen it at 12.40am while last bus to reach Loyang is normally 1am)
S-shift DDs are helpful as driver do not need to waste time to tell passengers to move in.
321 formally use LOs before (according to old forum posts) but that is a 2x DD. Not sure about 3x DDs plying Hougang St 11
Hmm, that's interesting with the late-night timings for 3818P. If that's the case, then 3818P easily runs the most hours on Sv 518 compared to the other buses uh..
But idk, in my opinion, it would make a big difference if they shifted 3818P to one slot later than what it's usually doing now. Considering one slot is 15mins average apart, it would easily mean that it reaches Orchard-Suntec during PM Peak right where the most people would queue to take Sv 518. And more justification to the SBST people in answering whether they should deploy more DDs for Sv 518 in the future.
3 BSEP MAN --> ADL on 963
3520G, 3521D, 3531A -- WLBP 963
3516U should be capacity upgrade on sv 966
sv 14 & sv 28 got SD --> DD conversion
sv 105 got fleet add.
Suspect 52 might have gotten BSEP fleet add, but a SD (SBS6461P)...
sv 315 got another two BSEP Citaro add...
* Justified because all pax from SGN North Ave 1 and SGN North Industrial estate still take sv 315
* This is sad coz ppl on 315 have to do a long detour via Chomp Chomp to get to Serangoon MRT but 116 has failed to encourage pax to shift due to its routing
* You can still spot sv 315 leaving NEX with 60-70 pax every evening while 116 from opposite stop gets max of 20 pax during prime PM peak.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:sv 315 got another two BSEP Citaro add...
* Justified because all pax from SGN North Ave 1 and SGN North Industrial estate still take sv 315
* This is sad coz ppl on 315 have to do a long detour via Chomp Chomp to get to Serangoon MRT but 116 has failed to encourage pax to shift due to its routing
* You can still spot sv 315 leaving NEX with 60-70 pax every evening while 116 from opposite stop gets max of 20 pax during prime PM peak.
I think 116 can get extension to maybe Geylang Lor 1? This should help to increase its usability. 73 also has many people too. It ought to really get BSEP too.
Originally posted by 23ispolo:I think 116 can get extension to maybe Geylang Lor 1? This should help to increase its usability. 73 also has many people too. It ought to really get BSEP too.
Yes 73 can get BSEP add to boost frequency though loading has dropped on this service. 116 something needs to be done. I think should at least divert it via Serangoon North Ave 1.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Yes 73 can get BSEP add to boost frequency though loading has dropped on this service. 116 something needs to be done. I think should at least divert it via Serangoon North Ave 1.
Yep, 2 BSEP adds are enough for 73, both or one be A/P... I think it does make sense for 116 to go by Serangoon North Ave 1, it will help give those living there a direct route instead of 315 which goes to Serangoon Gardens and Lorong Chuan. But I do think 116 denfinitely can extend to Geylang Lor 1 Ter or somewhere nearby...
Originally posted by 23ispolo:Suspect 52 might have gotten BSEP fleet add, but a SD (SBS6461P)...
no unlikely.
time and loc of spotting?
Originally posted by SMB1333T:no unlikely.
time and loc of spotting?
Bishan Stn, 12.51p.m. on Weekday (yesterday)
Originally posted by 23ispolo:Bishan Stn, 12.51p.m. on Weekday (yesterday)
nt perm just replacing missing bus
sv 966 super lucky... Got maximum number of DDs... 5 DDs and still 1 BSEP A22 also... too much haan!!
Service 190 got capacity downgrade.
TIB860S (O405G) > TIB829J (O405)
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:That's what I have also kept saying with all my observation.. people prefer to go to Serangoon and take 45/53 instead... 113 loading has dropped a lot in the last few months.. i have observed between 6.30-7.30 pm, only 25-30 pax boarding 113A... and if 113 comes behind... goes empty... .
45 should get more DDs, as 53 cannot take DDs.
Take out the KUBs SBS8812Y, SBS8813U etc
Originally posted by SBS3004X:45 should get more DDs, as 53 cannot take DDs.
Take out the KUBs SBS8812Y, SBS8813U etc
45 no need more dds lah later carbikebus will box u uh ~
45 for e time being sufficient lar,but if really they wanna add more DDs then its their business
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:sv 315 got another two BSEP Citaro add...
* Justified because all pax from SGN North Ave 1 and SGN North Industrial estate still take sv 315
* This is sad coz ppl on 315 have to do a long detour via Chomp Chomp to get to Serangoon MRT but 116 has failed to encourage pax to shift due to its routing
* You can still spot sv 315 leaving NEX with 60-70 pax every evening while 116 from opposite stop gets max of 20 pax during prime PM peak.
Serangoon North Ave 4, 3, 1, YCK Rd?