Originally posted by Lsk138:ok ! and i thought this July BSEP Wave only on this svcs 40, 52, 53/ 55/ 410, 87, 101, 191, 200 [off peak] as mention or maybe this 3357 r for 87 or 101
If it`s for 101,it will be great and also thank to SBS Transit for giving 101 DD Bsep bus but if for 87 also thank to SBS Transit because they add 1 more BSEP bus to 87 since SBS 6306E cannot cope with the high loading
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:11, 42 need one more bus for sure. 272, 402, 403 doing well with the current buses and the loading on it, but yes if it has to match QoS it needs addition.
115 always empty!! Do we even need that one bus on this service? Just get rid of this route. I could be wrong.
go talk to the MP regarding Sv115...... but hor, think the MP also no more... so can remove liao....
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:If it`s for 101,it will be great and also thank to SBS Transit for giving 101 DD Bsep bus but if for 87 also thank to SBS Transit because they add 1 more BSEP bus to 87 since SBS 6306E cannot cope with the high loading
to me no different have extra bsep WEGS or not now everyday already can see different SP wEGs rotating doing on 87 leh even the 36xx series also join in too .
Originally posted by Lsk138:ok ! and i thought this July BSEP Wave only on this svcs 40, 52, 53/ 55/ 410, 87, 101, 191, 200 [off peak] as mention or maybe this 3357 r for 87 or 101
u trust the person who put this info up?
101 get bsep wright... hohoho must be some joke
If 101 kena DD, i give you my head.
nothing is impossible like last time people said sv 109 can,t used DDs bcos of the height restrict @ Serangoon int. and now DDs running on this svc liao !
Oh ok.. Sv 101 also a lot of ppl one..
Originally posted by lemon1974:go talk to the MP regarding Sv115...... but hor, think the MP also no more... so can remove liao....
the purpose for 115's existence is to reduce the load on 113 during and off peak and peak hrs partially and to reduce the walking distance for the elderly from hougang ave 1 to hougang ave 3.. in the past many elderly ppl complain if they take 113 they would have to walk up to 15-20minutes just to get from the hg ave 1 bus stop to their home in hg ave 3. Also, dont forget the defu lane workers who had to walk at least 20 minutes to the bus stop at aljunied cc to board 113 to kovan station. If 115 is to be removed, improve 113's frequency first. There's a reason why the last bus of svc 115 is 6.15PM.
sv14 fail QOS evenng peak 15mns both directions...
Originally posted by SBS 7603R:Oh ok.. Sv 101 also a lot of ppl one..
Sv 243G, Sv 293 got DDs in the last few months, so why not on 101. There is no turning or height restriction for 101 and HG --> Buangkok Link loading is DD worthy. But if there is no DD add, I am happy with the Citaro add because that will improve frequency and space out the loading.
Originally posted by Acx1688:sv14 fail QOS evenng peak 15mns both directions...
sv14 frequency Clementi --> Bedok is around 10 mins evening peak, delays can be due to traffic conditions, opposite direction around 15 mins and believe because loading is lesser except for TNM --> UEC side and Alexandra Hospital --> Clementi.
I really hope 101 can get DD Bsep,it will be awesome and great to have DD Bsep on 101. 101 loading is like same as 109 load,right?
Originally posted by Lsk138:nothing is impossible like last time people said sv 109 can,t used DDs bcos of the height restrict @ Serangoon int. and now DDs running on this svc liao !
Yeah me too,I also believe that Serangoon Int got height restrict
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:Yeah me too,I also believe that Serangoon Int got height restrict
Thanks to sv 109 now everyone knows that Serangoon Int can take DDs. It is a really small interchange, otherwise could have called in more services.
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:I really hope 101 can get DD Bsep,it will be awesome and great to have DD Bsep on 101. 101 loading is like same as 109 load,right?
Hmmm... what do you mean by 101 loading is like 109? Their loading patterns / routes are completely different.
suspect 183 get another BSEP DD coz 3362L 1st day on 183
somemore new ett for 183 starts today
Originally posted by lemon1974:go talk to the MP regarding Sv115...... but hor, think the MP also no more... so can remove liao....
sbst wanted to remove 115 a few years ago and it was appoved! but then hor, some MP stepped in to stop it from being removed so there it is, until now...
but that mp is no more there liaoz...
Sv 89 gets the BSEP add as well WEF 15 Jul.
Like what others mention, 3357C did Sv 89 yesterday. 3357C did Sv 89 today (16 Jul) as well, and more importantly, it's on a new slot in front of a Trident (forgot which one,DT is that, sorry abt that). Towards Changi Cargo Ter @ 0710hrs outside Pasir Ris Central, time diff to the Trident behind was only 3mins.
I wouldn't discount the possibility that it might be a SP doing a new BSEP slot (since it did Sv 89 alr on its 1st day IIRC?), but for now I'll edit on Wiki as perm 89 first. Any updates feel free to edit later on. Cheers.
Originally posted by sbst191:the purpose for 115's existence is to reduce the load on 113 during and off peak and peak hrs partially and to reduce the walking distance for the elderly from hougang ave 1 to hougang ave 3.. in the past many elderly ppl complain if they take 113 they would have to walk up to 15-20minutes just to get from the hg ave 1 bus stop to their home in hg ave 3. Also, dont forget the defu lane workers who had to walk at least 20 minutes to the bus stop at aljunied cc to board 113 to kovan station. If 115 is to be removed, improve 113's frequency first. There's a reason why the last bus of svc 115 is 6.15PM.
i know..... explain this to bus analayzer instead since he ask for sv115 to be removed..
Originally posted by smrtbsbs:sbst wanted to remove 115 a few years ago and it was appoved! but then hor, some MP stepped in to stop it from being removed so there it is, until now...
but that mp is no more there liaoz...
yes.. this is basically what i am trying to say also. even the press release is out already..... but yet some guy dunno about it...
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Hmmm... what do you mean by 101 loading is like 109? Their loading patterns / routes are completely different.
I asking whether 101 loading is like almost the same as 109 loading
115 should just merge with 119.Save money
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:115 should just merge with 119.Save money
Yeah. No need for 115. IF I say this, people start giving history lectures here. I know the background on 115. But that was quite sometime back. They can take the decision again instead of operating one more route without much value. MP gone right, so try again.
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:I asking whether 101 loading is like almost the same as 109 loading
I would say different for the reason that 101 high loading is more like a feeder from Hougang MRT to Buangkok Link.
109 is a longer route, and IMO the high loading is between YCK Road and Sengkang (can go upto 70-80 pax on WEGs) and then around 50-60 pax to PSR. But since many people travel long distance on 109, having more DDs on this service makes more sense, purely for comfort reason.
Now you see why SBST improved 156...
Confirm kena fined by LTA