Effective when?
191 meaning 2 buses,Hmm at last!Hope 11 & 115 tio also
hoping sv 109 can get BSEP buses but no chance liao ! Anyway hope 101 can get BSEP DD buses if can .
Later SMB388S and his gang of kids confirm go rare and significant cameos over this
Originally posted by carbikebus:191 meaning 2 buses,Hmm at last!Hope 11 & 115 tio also
115 no need additional bus because alr got 113 covering most of its route. Just need to improve 113's frequency. 113's off peak freq is same as 115.
Originally posted by sbst275:Sv 40, 52, 53/ 55/ 410, 87, 101, 191, 200 [off peak]
should be 53. both 55 and 410 have no timetable change at all...
Originally posted by ahjack 77:Effective when?
15 July...
Originally posted by sbst275:Sv 40, 52, 53/ 55/ 410, 87, 101, 191, 200 [off peak]
101 will use Bsep Wright bus or BSEP citaro?
325 got 1 extra BSEP buses now... Seems to be SBS6400R... Keep on cameoing on 325 with all the other perm buses and SBS6308A... Plus not time for 112 crossover that time...
Originally posted by SBS2656X:325 got 1 extra BSEP buses now... Seems to be SBS6400R... Keep on cameoing on 325 with all the other perm buses and SBS6308A... Plus not time for 112 crossover that time...
Then only SBS 2666S is the only bus from 112 that crossover to 325 during AM peak.About the PM peak,SBS 2666S does not crossover to 325 and I think SBS 964U operates as a spit shift bus and does not do crossover to 325 already since the SBS 6400R have been add into 325 fleet.
Originally posted by SBS2656X:325 got 1 extra BSEP buses now... Seems to be SBS6400R... Keep on cameoing on 325 with all the other perm buses and SBS6308A... Plus not time for 112 crossover that time...
dun think 6400R to 325 leh ! only cameoed on 325 a few times only and i also seen it recently doing on 43 & 116
Originally posted by Lsk138:dun think 6400R to 325 leh ! only cameoed on 325 a few times only and i also seen it recently doing on 43 & 116
Me too,I also dun think that SBS 6400R is perm 325 since it cameo on 43 and 116 that you said
Originally posted by Lsk138:dun think 6400R to 325 leh ! only cameoed on 325 a few times only and i also seen it recently doing on 43 & 116
Yesterday SBS6302R was on 325... Along with
SBS1996X - Replace SBS1937S
SBS2656X
SBS6127E - Replace SBS6146A
SBS6147Y
SBS6148U
SBS6149S
SBS6308A
Originally posted by SBS2656X:Yesterday SBS6302R was on 325... Along with
SBS1996X - Replace SBS1937S
SBS2656X
SBS6127E - Replace SBS6146A
SBS6147Y
SBS6148U
SBS6149S
SBS6308A
yeah ! now also very common to see these PERM or SP BSEP citaros running around on other svcs like today 6350B also doing on 159 .
and also now everyday (wkday) can see extra BSEP WEGS running on 72
today hv 3352 & 3353 and ytd hv 3347 & 3348 together with 3303H .
89 and 161 got BSEP? Cause got two BSEP buses doing on 161 today which are SBS 3307Y and SBS 3329J and got SBS 3357C doing 89 today
DELETED
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:89 and 161 got BSEP? Cause got two BSEP buses doing on 161 today which are SBS 3307Y and SBS 3329J and got SBS 3357C doing 89 today
Any timetable change for sv 161 then ?
Originally posted by Lsk138:Any timetable change for sv 161 then ?
I'm not sure
What are they going to do of so many BSEP SP Wrights? The routes listed above except sv 87 are not easy guess for Wrights.
I think 52 might get a WEG addition this time around, and they might experiment DDs on 101 (which is a v good idea).
Originally posted by sbst275:this wave only got 191 involved…
remaining 11, 42, 57, 115, 193, 194, 268, 272, 402, 403 for SBST side yet to comply w/ QoS basic requirement
11, 42 need one more bus for sure. 272, 402, 403 doing well with the current buses and the loading on it, but yes if it has to match QoS it needs addition.
115 always empty!! Do we even need that one bus on this service? Just get rid of this route. I could be wrong.
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:I'm not sure
ok ! and i thought this July BSEP Wave only on this svcs 40, 52, 53/ 55/ 410, 87, 101, 191, 200 [off peak] as mention or maybe this 3357 r for 87 or 101
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:11, 42 need one more bus for sure. 272, 402, 403 doing well with the current buses and the loading on it, but yes if it has to match QoS it needs addition.
115 always empty!! Do we even need that one bus on this service? Just get rid of this route. I could be wrong.
Maybe 115 should merge with 119?