Hi all
Is it me or do I think 116 route requires some replanning at the loop part at Serangoon(it should follow 315 and into the interchange)?
It should go inside SGN INT and do a loop coming out. (Yeah I know the small INT is crowded but I think it will be more convenient for commuters)
It doesn't make sense for a passenger who just finish shopping at Nex to travel to the furthest bus stop to wait for only 1 bus at 66359 for 116.
Whatsmore the route was to improve connectivity between Serangoon and Hougang. I dont see how it improves the portion from Serangon -> Hougang when I can only choose 1 option between 147 vs 116.
But anyone can give the rationale on why did they make 116 loop the way it is?
In b4 lock
No need dedicated thread lol
Originally posted by Y_Shun:Hi all
Is it me or do I think 116 route requires some replanning at the loop part at Serangoon(it should follow 315 and into the interchange)?
It should go inside SGN INT and do a loop coming out. (Yeah I know the small INT is crowded but I think it will be more convenient for commuters)
It doesn't make sense for a passenger who just finish shopping at Nex to travel to the furthest bus stop to wait for only 1 bus at 66359 for 116.
Whatsmore the route was to improve connectivity between Serangoon and Hougang. I dont see how it improves the portion from Serangon -> Hougang when I can only choose 1 option between 147 vs 116.
But anyone can give the rationale on why did they make 116 loop the way it is?
The 116 subject has been discussed multiple times with the same points as you raised. No need for a separate topic. Such points can be mentioned in "LTA topic" or "Miscillaneous Topics".
I think it will be more useful if you can direct me to the link.
116 can combine with 315, my suggestion.
Originally posted by sbst275:got to realise the traffic condition at S’goon Ctrl during PM peak
after opening of nex, sgoon ctrl's traffic became sipeh teruk liao lor.
Speaking of 315 does it warrant a couple of DDs for peak hours and Weekends?