Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
Agreed. But which services are you talking about? HGDEP has not taken many DDs lately. Even BSEP last 2-3 rounds no DD intake.
83,101,112,315?
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Is the 168 BSEP Citaro getting replaced with BSEP Wright? That would be a good deciison...
Should be since the 168 BSEP Citaro is now perm 20.There is a lot of SP BSEP Wrights at BNDEP.
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:Should be since the 168 BSEP Citaro is now perm 20.There is a lot of SP BSEP Wrights at BNDEP.
Looks like svc 2, 45, 60, 168 all are going to get Wright replacement for their Citaros thanks to sv 20.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:I don't even see SBS1000U anymore.
And I don't even see TIB501D anymore.. 1000U's rival... 1000U was the DD boy while TIB501D was the bendy boy :))
Where are you guys?
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:And I don't even see TIB501D anymore.. 1000U's rival... 1000U was the DD boy while TIB501D was the bendy boy :))
Where are you guys?
Originally posted by SMB388S:
They migrated to BIS because this forum is fail~
No, they migrated to FB because here got BIS shit posts. SBS6305H also gone, he also gone from FB, cause he cannot tahan all this nonsense BIS shit in Singapore, so he flew to another country.
Could it be somehow that the BIS clones will also migrate to Facebook and create havoc over there?
But even if they migrate and wreak havoc there, me and some other admins willl obviously find out who the fuck are they and expel them. We already have 1 SGWiki false info inserter over there(Jong Han aka Epos aka SMB400A).
Info from BIS most reliable page on Singapore Buses~
This is epic.
After all the grumbling on this forum for Citaros on sv 2 and sv 168, both Citaros are finally replaced with the well-deserved Wrights.
sv 60 also got Wright and sv 45 got 2 BSEP Wrights. Sweet!
Now, do the same for sv 87 also.
so 168 full fleet DD again
Give citaros away to get wrights
Originally posted by Gus.chong:Could it be somehow that the BIS clones will also migrate to Facebook and create havoc over there?
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:And I don't even see TIB501D anymore.. 1000U's rival... 1000U was the DD boy while TIB501D was the bendy boy :))
Where are you guys?
so does TIB868X.
Info from BIS most trusted page on Singapore Buses~
Originally posted by SBS 6238T:83,101,112,315?
Yes for 101. 2 DDs during morning / evening peak.
Strongly suggest LTA to build roadside terminal at Kovan.
Service 325 should start from Kovan instead of Hougang MRT.
113 should start at Kovan and go to Serangoon via HG Ave 1, Lor Ah Soo.
101 can also start at Kovan instead of Serangoon.
82 and 107 should be merged. No need for 2 separate routes. Many people in SGK / PGL area going to Bendemeer / Potong will benefit with this merger.
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Strongly suggest LTA to build roadside terminal at Kovan.
Service 325 should start from Kovan instead of Hougang MRT.
113 should start at Kovan and go to Serangoon via HG Ave 1, Lor Ah Soo.
101 can also start at Kovan instead of Serangoon.
82 and 107 should be merged. No need for 2 separate routes. Many people in SGK / PGL area going to Bendemeer / Potong will benefit with this merger.
Agree for everything except 101's starter at Kovan. Because from Serangoon - Kovan during PM Peak to roughly 10pm, there will be alot of people relying on 101 to travel from s'goon to kovan area. And MRT is very pack, so maybe some people prefer 101 as an alternative.
1 more point, Kovan is quite jammed during peak periods or sometime off-peaks. Can you be more specific at where should LTA build the roadside ter?
Wow...... even after 9 months.... sv53's improvement is like no improvement at all.
At bishan int, all 53 BCs is cmi and will take their sweet time to start work. Bus should reach berth at specific time, then at specific time run to bus, switch on eds, waste 5mins dunno do what shit. Other svcs most of the time don't have this kind of prob. If say the bus park too long then need to wait few minutes before bus become normal agn, can understand.
Real problem is, don't want to start work, still want cramp 7 - 8 citaros there when the whole interchange is so fking small? WTF this BCs doing and how sbst arrange their time? Then ltr when start work time, bunch 3 - 4 buses and at most with few sec interval. Then next bus wait for half hour?
Seriously ar......
Should 860 not be Intra-Town like 811 and 812. Why is it a trunk when all it does is connects Yishun and Khatib which fall under the same town of Yishun?
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Should 860 not be Intra-Town like 811 and 812. Why is it a trunk when all it does is connects Yishun and Khatib which fall under the same town of Yishun?
Same goes to why 859 is considered a trunk, because it goes to Yishun? But its like the only feeder in SBW
Originally posted by TIB 585L:Same goes to why 859 is considered a trunk, because it goes to Yishun? But its like the only feeder in SBW
859 - I can still understand coz it goes to Yishun, which is considered a separate town from Sembawang. But 860 is a big question for me.
So is 181. Why is it not a feeder when 241, 243 can be feeders? All it does is go to Jurong West Ave 3.
168's getting different BSEP Wrights each day afaik, first was 3336, then 3354
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:Should 860 not be Intra-Town like 811 and 812. Why is it a trunk when all it does is connects Yishun and Khatib which fall under the same town of Yishun?
Aiyo bro u don't know meh?If trunk can charge stage fares if feeder flat fare leh