Time to call Mr Watson Sunikmaniam?
wtf... now got 9 clones...
228,1337,666,6134,161,Gus chong e.,3001
Now we have...
Boeing 787 L0VUR,MANBus
BIS's Henchmen...
Originally posted by carbikebus:It's the same old clone..Wonder if the mod can track his ip and ban him forever?Create nuisance and dare to threaten ppl with lawyer things..Get a life la
i prefer their IPs to be banned. but unfortunately moderators cant, admin is inactive, and none of us is open to moving to another forum hoster
Then the Volgren O405 dump to which svc?
178?
Originally posted by TIB1218R:Then the Volgren O405 dump to which svc?
178?
remember buses more than 15 years old cannot apply for JB permit
Originally posted by sbst275:sure or not…
what abt MKIII
i heard it from somewhere but i forgot... mk3 until how old? i know O405 is until they nearly 16 year old
Originally posted by sbst275:MKIII from 1993 use until 2011… 18 yrs on the road…
Malaysia dun give a hoot abt bus age until recently.. 20 yrs…
Who tell your 15 yrs..
i rembered someone telling me some time back but i forgot...
then why SMRT chose to switch to OCs?
I miss the MKIIIs.
It was their idea to compete with SBS on product differentiation (ie different buses) since they couldnt compete on price.
That went to the extent of buying $1k ergo chairs for their buses, though the type wasn't specified from the sources. Maybe you guys know better.
And that tactic worked.......when the buses were still new.
Now is where the problem of mainteinance comes......the frankenstein buses are the most visible examples.
data indicates that contrary to some speculation, SMRTB routes do not bleed as much as SBST in overall terms.
which is curious. apparently SBST services do not earn as much in per bus distance (km) terms as we often imagined.
It really is the cost in per bus terms that was staggering for SMRT, and I would think one major reason is really how SMRT BCs love to floor the pedal.
Another source revealed that educating Chinese truck drivers in Guangzhou on fuel efficiency tactics (ie not flooring the pedal unnecessarily) saved companies as much as 30% in fuel cost.
food for thought.
In per bus distance travelled terms, the revenue earned by SMRT actually exceeds SBST, indicating that SMRT routes in fact ferry more pax.
Of course there are reasons also as simple as that SMRT's frequency is also more cui in general, causing more people to get onto one bus than in SBST's case. Which is less than ideal.
So we cant read too directly in these numbers also.
This might be of interest to svc_238.
Originally posted by Gus.chong e:SBST must deploy Citaros on 160 and 170!!!
The worst decision is to put Cuitaro on JB service.I want KUB
Originally posted by sbst275:mmm.. the figure got incl their Premium Sv? $5 wo…
somemore RWS
possibly.
Because that study drew data from 2010 annual report from SMRT.
I guess 950 is getting "triple-model fleet"? 4 Volgrens, 6 MAN, 10 OCs eh?
From TIB585L & TIB1234T :
SMB283K also JB Reg.