Services that need to be rerouted/extended/shortened
-
What is your pick?
61 should skip Ubi sector.From McPherson just follow 154 route to Eunos.
67 should terminate at Bedok.
969 should stop at Jln Kayu bus stop.
858 should skip sembawang.Sembawang to introduced a new svc to airport.
902 should extend to loop at Wl ind pk E4.
A new service from sembawang to Tampines.
167 should terminate at Shenton way.961 at marina centre.
77 to loop at Suntec.857 starts from sembawang terminate at marina centre.
172 loops at BNL ditto for 187.178 Bt batok loops at BNL.
853 to loop at marine terrace or siglap rd.980/985 to ends at Sims place.
171 can cut short to new bridge rd.970?New bridge rd?
-
A new service in Hougang plying Buangkok Green and AMK to CBD area.
-
Buangkok integrated resorts to Hougang ok or not?
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
Buangkok integrated resorts to Hougang ok or not?
Buangkok and Bangkok ==
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
What is your pick?
61 should skip Ubi sector.From McPherson just follow 154 route to Eunos.
67 should terminate at Bedok.
969 should stop at Jln Kayu bus stop.
858 should skip sembawang.Sembawang to introduced a new svc to airport.
902 should extend to loop at Wl ind pk E4.
A new service from sembawang to Tampines.
167 should terminate at Shenton way.961 at marina centre.
77 to loop at Suntec.857 starts from sembawang terminate at marina centre.
172 loops at BNL ditto for 187.178 Bt batok loops at BNL.
853 to loop at marine terrace or siglap rd.980/985 to ends at Sims place.
171 can cut short to new bridge rd.970?New bridge rd?
67 should remain as it is
167 and 961 remain as it is, important links and the deleted sectors are relatively populated
77 YES
857 how about sembawang to suntec loop? or sembawang to shenton way via MBS
how can 187 loop at BNL? route is abit long...
853 loop there too far. end at UEC everyday better
171 no, should stay as it is. and there's 190
970 stay as it is
my 2 cents
-
187 got ply expressway mah..Then 180 already terminate at BNL.178 should start from Bt Batok-Boon Lay lots of catchment.Bt batok towards WDL nowadays crap leh
-
Two services...
One service from BBT to PNG via CCK and BPJ, TPY, Bishan, AMK, YCK and SKG.
One service from BNL to PNG via JE, Clementi, BNV, TPY, SGN, HG and SKG.
Very poor connectivity between these areas...
-
SBW underutilized ah bro..other smrt controlled areas seem sufficient for now.
Really hope 8 can extend to Pasir Ris or Changi Village?
-
Merge Service 82 with Service 107
Punggol Int - Shenton Way Ter
Punggol Int - Marina Centre (loop) -
Originally posted by carbikebus:
187 got ply expressway mah..Then 180 already terminate at BNL.178 should start from Bt Batok-Boon Lay lots of catchment.Bt batok towards WDL nowadays crap leh
Should scrap 178 no people take one!!!
-
Originally posted by SMB228X:
Should scrap 178 no people take one!!!
Take thenumber 1,7,8, on a paper and scrap it -
Originally posted by carbikebus:
What is your pick?
61 should skip Ubi sector.From McPherson just follow 154 route to Eunos.
858 should skip sembawang.Sembawang to introduced a new svc to airport.
171 can cut short to new bridge rd.970?New bridge rd?
171 seems fine to me.
61 should be cut instead to terminate at New Bridge Rd. Its deleted sector can be covered by a new SBST route.
858 extension to Sembawang is totally pointless in the first place. It lengthenes the travelling time of Woodlands commuters to the airport, worsen the crowd levels for Yishun residents and the poor BCs have to drive longer for every trip. 858 should be cut back to its original route plying Gambas Ave and skip Sembawang.
Instead 178 can be extended to Sembawang.
-
Originally posted by gorby107:
Merge Service 82 with Service 107
Punggol Int - Shenton Way Ter
Punggol Int - Marina Centre (loop)Totally agree with this
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
Buangkok integrated resorts to Hougang ok or not?
Hahahaa! Buangkok Intergrated Resorts
-
Originally posted by TIB868X:
67 should remain as it is
167 and 961 remain as it is, important links and the deleted sectors are relatively populated
77 YES
857 how about sembawang to suntec loop? or sembawang to shenton way via MBS
how can 187 loop at BNL? route is abit long...
853 loop there too far. end at UEC everyday better
171 no, should stay as it is. and there's 190
970 stay as it is
my 2 cents
857 cannot lah.
Morning reach Khatib MRT, full house already..
Evening at Boon Keng also same...
Weekends more worst.. -
Originally posted by TIB1218R:
857 cannot lah.
Morning reach Khatib MRT, full house already..
Evening at Boon Keng also same...
Weekends more worst..Frequency of 857 is rili bad. I waited 20 mins for 857 on wed nite at 11pm and SMB46D came. When i dropped at YIS, SMB227Z came- A 'ghost' bus. Then SMB228X came- Less than 5 pax in the bus. Both MANs came less than 5 mins aft i alighted from the OC
-
At first I'm curious how 857 got 15 buses..SMRT cock one la,Put 15 buses but nearly 6 are split shift when the svc itself is popular even during off peak.Split shift buses also end early no wonder..857 can extend to Sembawang follow 858 routes from Yishun to Sbw itself.All they need is add 2 more normal day buses and revise the freq.
-
Originally posted by vicamour:
171 seems fine to me.
61 should be cut instead to terminate at New Bridge Rd. Its deleted sector can be covered by a new SBST route.
858 extension to Sembawang is totally pointless in the first place. It lengthenes the travelling time of Woodlands commuters to the airport, worsen the crowd levels for Yishun residents and the poor BCs have to drive longer for every trip. 858 should be cut back to its original route plying Gambas Ave and skip Sembawang.
Instead 178 can be extended to Sembawang.
178 can extend to Sbw but cut short till Bukit Batok only Lor
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
At first I'm curious how 857 got 15 buses..SMRT cock one la,Put 15 buses but nearly 6 are split shift when the svc itself is popular even during off peak.Split shift buses also end early no wonder..857 can extend to Sembawang follow 858 routes from Yishun to Sbw itself.All they need is add 2 more normal day buses and revise the freq.
I agree. 857 doesnt have alot of buses maybe that why we have to wait 20+ mins for one to come+ SBW is quite underutilised.
-
Think need to check back 857 fleets,How come every time I heard ppl wait more than 17-25 mins?Think less than 15 buses.966 is more frequent now.
-
Originally posted by carbikebus:
Think need to check back 857 fleets,How come every time I heard ppl wait more than 17-25 mins?Think less than 15 buses.966 is more frequent now.
ya its weird. ever since 857 turned WAB, i never had to wait more then 20 minutes for this bus.
It always comes between 5-15 minutes. so it is weird when people say they wait for more than 20 minutes for 857.
Anyway Im thinking of this:
73 Yio Chu Kang Ter to TPY Int(goes to amk ave 3, amk ave 6, YCK Ter)
969 add 1 more stop to CGA (not possible because of bendies, but might be feasible in future?)
163 Woodlands Int to TPY Int(add on punggol road, TPE/SLE Woodlands Ave 2, Woodlands Int)
82 merge with 107 to form 82 : Punggol to Shenton Way
39 Yishun Interchange to Changi Village Terminal
85 Punggol Terminal to Sembawang Interchange
119 Punggol Interchange to Hougang Interchange
-
Originally posted by SBST163:
ya its weird. ever since 857 turned WAB, i never had to wait more then 20 minutes for this bus.
It always comes between 5-15 minutes. so it is weird when people say they wait for more than 20 minutes for 857.
Anyway Im thinking of this:
73 Yio Chu Kang Ter to TPY Int(goes to amk ave 3, amk ave 6, YCK Ter)
969 add 1 more stop to CGA (not possible because of bendies, but might be feasible in future?)
163 Woodlands Int to TPY Int(add on punggol road, TPE/SLE Woodlands Ave 2, Woodlands Int)
82 merge with 107 to form 82 : Punggol to Shenton Way
39 Yishun Interchange to Changi Village Terminal
85 Punggol Terminal to Sembawang Interchange
119 Punggol Interchange to Hougang Interchange
73 - ok
969 - See people in Tampines shoot you then know, also add traffic to CGA - 858 is enough
163 - make 159 WAB first, also duplicating with 161
82 + 107 - ok good one
39 - Too long a route - you want kill the BC ah?
85 - ok
119 - not smooth flowing. Duplicate 80, 87, 113 and MRT
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
73 - ok
969 - See people in Tampines shoot you then know, also add traffic to CGA - 858 is enough
163 - make 159 WAB first, also duplicating with 161
82 + 107 - ok good one
39 - Too long a route - you want kill the BC ah?
85 - ok
119 - not smooth flowing. Duplicate 80, 87, 113 and MRT
73 - ok
969 - See people in Tampines shoot you then know, also add traffic to CGA - 858 is enough (to provide faster accessibility from the east to woodlands, 858 is taking too long, but if really extend, 969 can no longer have bendies, which is not ideal)
163 - make 159 WAB first, also duplicating with 161 (to cope with 161's load) haha
82 + 107 - ok good one
39 - Too long a route - you want kill the BC ah? (ok)
85 - ok
119 - not smooth flowing. Duplicate 80, 87, 113 and MRT (119 route is redundant, i think eiter extend or withdraw =X)
-
SMRT should introduce new service from Sembawang to Changi Cargo Complex via Yishun, SLE/TPE, Jalan Kayu and Changi Village..
23 should loop at Orchard Road
85 should ply Punggol Drive since there's no bus service there...
119 merge with 113 and extend to Hougang street 11 via Hougang street 21, Hougang Avenue 1 and Lorong Ah Soo
136 to ply Edgefield Plains, Punggol Drive and Punggol Place...189 extend to the Marina Centre via Kent Ridge Term, West Coast Highway(express sector) , Shenton Way, MBS and Suntec City..
Hehee -
23 used to loop at Orchard road, it was shorten to loop at Rochor Road due to the MRT. I think is best to keep svc 23 as it is.