Optimum Utilization of Double Deckers
-
Originally posted by SMB228X:
3, 15, 33, 36, 66, 100, 105, 109, 113, 125, 200 all should get DD or bendy!!
Their load is high.
But ahlunjia is correct.
If not why are they still not DD yet? 100, 105, 109 and 103 is impossible due to height restrictions of Serangoon interchange - Another reason why 81 got kicked out.
And 103 got bendys before, you moron.
Go home and study history of Singapore before coming out and talk cock on SgForums you facebook photocopy machine. -
43's DD is only ultilized from NEX to Punggol - The load is extremely high, the same as 70, which load also begins from NEX to YCK.
-
Originally posted by SMB228X:
So the only solution is to use bendy bus like Citaro Gs!!! And O405G can go through South Buona Vista Road!!!!
YES THEY CAN GO THROUGH. LIKE HELL.
But the problem still lies on SBST's Bus Interchanges.
All those services you mentioned, their interchanges have parking slots that are unsuitable for bendys, since many people already discouraged SG to use bendys since in such a small land, bendys are under-optimized. DDs, however, can be FULLY OPTIMISED since it is compact, 12m in length and can carry large amount of pessangers. But still, height restriction is still the problem. Another reason why ALL CHANGI AIRPORT SERVICES ARE NOT DDS!!! YOU WANT PEOPLE TO DIE AGAIN FROM SITTING ON THE TOP FLOOR IS IT? YOU WANT TO SHOOT AT US? YOU WILL BE SHOT BACK AND DEAD. YOUR AWFUL REASONS ARE INCOMPATITABLE WITH THE TRUTH. SO SHUT UP, SHUT DOWN YOUR COMPUTER AND GET LOST.
And please do not argue. Argue at a argumentative forum. The above is just a comment. -
Originally posted by SBS2656X:
YES THEY CAN GO THROUGH. LIKE HELL.
But the problem still lies on SBST's Bus Interchanges.
All those services you mentioned, their interchanges have parking slots that are unsuitable for bendys, since many people already discouraged SG to use bendys since in such a small land, bendys are under-optimized. DDs, however, can be FULLY OPTIMISED since it is compact, 12m in length and can carry large amount of pessangers. But still, height restriction is still the problem. Another reason why ALL CHANGI AIRPORT SERVICES ARE NOT DDS!!! YOU WANT PEOPLE TO DIE AGAIN FROM SITTING ON THE TOP FLOOR IS IT? YOU WANT TO SHOOT AT US? YOU WILL BE SHOT BACK AND DEAD. YOUR AWFUL REASONS ARE INCOMPATITABLE WITH THE TRUTH. SO SHUT UP, SHUT DOWN YOUR COMPUTER AND GET LOST.
And please do not argue. Argue at a argumentative forum. The above is just a comment.Bendy u don't want. DD u also don't want. Then what u want??? Only can put more Citaros to take all the passengers!!
-
O405G can go through South Bunoa Vista Road!! TIB838H went down before so U SHUT UP!!!!
-
Originally posted by SMB228X:
Bendy u don't want. DD u also don't want. Then what u want??? Only can put more Citaros to take all the passengers!!
The load of 113 does not require citaros.
1. 103 has 15+ bus stops along it's routes that are unaccessible to PIWs.
2. Most of the citaros are optimised already.
3. Shut up.
4. Get the fotch off.
5. Stop cloning yourself.
6. You are acting horribly in your cloning skills.
7. It is too obvious.
8. At least act better.
9. Stop commenting on whatever others say.
10. You simply cannot be helped.
1^. Everyone, ignore SMB228X.
2^. Everyone, treat his posts as :
===============================================================
---------------------------------------POST REMOVED----------------------------------------
===============================================================
3^. Everyone, correcting him is useless.
4^. Correcting him is just wasting time.
5^. He will never correct himself because he doesn't even know how to use a correction tape on himself. -
Originally posted by SBS2656X:
Their load is high.
But ahlunjia is correct.
If not why are they still not DD yet? 100, 105, 109 and 113 is impossible due to height restrictions of Serangoon interchange - Another reason why 81 got kicked out.
And 103 got bendys before, you moron.
Go home and study history of Singapore before coming out and talk cock on SgForums you facebook photocopy machine.105 cannot use DDs because of Lorong Chuan.
103 never have bendies before to my knowledge. It's 82 that have bendies.
And did 113 even call at Serangoon Interchange?
-
Originally posted by SBS2656X:
The load of 113 does not require citaros.
1. 113 has 15+ bus stops along it's routes that are unaccessible to PIWs.
2. Most of the citaros are optimised already.
3. Shut up.
4. Get the fotch off.
5. Stop cloning yourself.
6. You are acting horribly in your cloning skills.
7. It is too obvious.
8. At least act better.
9. Stop commenting on whatever others say.
10. You simply cannot be helped.
1^. Everyone, ignore SMB228X.
2^. Everyone, treat his posts as :
===============================================================
---------------------------------------POST REMOVED----------------------------------------
===============================================================
3^. Everyone, correcting him is useless.
4^. Correcting him is just wasting time.
5^. He will never correct himself because he doesn't even know how to use a correction tape on himself.113 bus-stops all wab-accessible la dey.
-
113's peak hour evening load can be full from 5pm all the way to 9pm.
From Kovan Station Towards Hougang Ave 1.
Morning peak hour load lesser than evening load but still have the dd seats full load.
113A sometimes quite packed also even though 5-7 mins freq
113 should have DDs.. because of the minton rise construction site,
dds cannot be accessible unless they finish their project maybe got chance..
and btw citaros's maximum loading is lesser than kub..
-
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
105 cannot use DDs because of Lorong Chuan.
103 never have bendies before to my knowledge. It's 82 that have bendies.
And did 113 even call at Serangoon Interchange?
yeah. 113 dosent call there. But the looping point is only a few stops away from SGN int LOL. if 113 extend to that int i think 0% chance of having DD at all.
and btw the loading for 82 currently dosent need DDs. I think need full fleet citaro cause low demand. Citaros are for low-demand svcs anyway
-
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
yeah. 113 dosent call there. But the looping point is only a few stops away from SGN int LOL. if 113 extend to that int i think 0% chance of having DD at all.
and btw the loading for 82 currently dosent need DDs. I think need full fleet citaro cause low demand. Citaros are for low-demand svcs anyway
But it is still not confirm whether the Serangoon Bus Interchange can accomodate DDs.
As for service 82 , I was just correcting that guy about which service having bendies.
-
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
But it is still not confirm whether the Serangoon Bus Interchange can accomodate DDs.
As for service 82 , I was just correcting that guy about which service having bendies.
Well why 81 was kicked out?
it became a loop svc? 28km from Tampines to sgn and back
-
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
yeah. 113 dosent call there. But the looping point is only a few stops away from SGN int LOL. if 113 extend to that int i think 0% chance of having DD at all.
and btw the loading for 82 currently dosent need DDs. I think need full fleet citaro cause low demand. Citaros are for low-demand svcs anyway
Then explain why services 27 and 34 get Citaros? To my opinion the low demand services should stick to the old SD fleets. If I remember correctly that was SBS trend in the past, the low demand services that were FAC even got some fleets downgraded to NAC buses.
For service 113, yes, it never plied to Serangoon int at all. 113 was a merger of feeder services 321 and 326 when the old Hougang South int closed down in early 2004.
-
which bright fella proclaimed Serangoon is not DD friendly just because there's no DD services serving the interchange?
-
Originally posted by SMB228X:
Bendy u don't want. DD u also don't want. Then what u want??? Only can put more Citaros to take all the passengers!!
NO!! PUT IN ALBION VIKINGS!!
-
Originally posted by service_238:
which bright fella proclaimed Serangoon is not DD friendly just because there's no DD services serving the interchange?
that was me and some other bus fans.
can ask int staff also and with reference to CGA terminal
-
Originally posted by ahlunjia:
NO!! PUT IN ALBION VIKINGS!!Why not put in even older buses before the Japanese Occupation?
-
The reason why 27 and 36 dont have DD is because of low clearance at Changi Terminal Basement 1,2,3 where the bus stops, otherwise they deserve to be DD for sure.
Buses from Serangoon Interchange don't really require DD - look at 100 or 105 - the bus hardly is standing even in peak hours for SD, then there is no need for DD. But let me correct, 100 does have standing between CBD and Beach road. This is just 20% of the route.Routes of 57 & 131 should be swapped at Telok Blangah way to accommodate DD on 131.What is the loading on 143? -
Originally posted by service_238:
which bright fella proclaimed Serangoon is not DD friendly just because there's no DD services serving the interchange?
Some bright fella is also saying that 113 has no DD because SRGN Int cannot have DD.
113?
SRGN?
-
What does NEX stand for?Originally posted by SBS2656X:
43's DD is only ultilized from NEX to Punggol - The load is extremely high, the same as 70, which load also begins from NEX to YCK.
-
SGN can take DDs,Ever saw a training VO park at there.
Sbst is smart in deploying DDs on 222,240,241,291,334.Just look at d loads..
-
service like 59 also need DD during peak hours the arrival time is horrible, sometime more than 10min overloaded with people even with DD. I think 59 wait time should cut to half from 10 min to 5min and 87 should use both DD and SD buses mix some 87 timing not even need DD bus like now 10AM use SD and let DD use for other service or rest in deport to save diesel.
wonder how sbst manage the DD and it SD?
-
Like now non peak some service can use SD bus, DD bus is a waste of diesel. some short distance service should not even need DD bus nobody even want to climb up to upper deck. SBST should increase the bus timing for feeder bus instead of using DD for feeder bus like in jurong area so many old DDs drinking diesel like water with low passengers whole days. SBST should order ready made SD buses like citaro no assemble wasting time take too long to bulid a bus to replace those old junk DDs in jurong area. new SD take over KUBs and let those rocker use in jurong area to replace old kunk DDs buses.
for those stupid person always like bandy bus and double decker bus think again if next time your bus fare increase don't blame the operators.
-
Originally posted by BusAnalayzer:
What does NEX stand for?
NEX stands for North East Xorph. Just kidding
It is the name of the shopping mall at the heart of Serangoon. -
Correction : 103* not 113**