Redeployments (Part 15)
-
Come on! It's already 1950++ posts on part 14!
CONTINUE IT HERE!
Hoping to see some WEG perming 161 gradually like 87. -
================================================================
And oh ya, MODERATORS please STICKY this thread and LOCK the old thread
ONCE the OLD THREAD exceeded 1980 or 1950 posts. [ Decided by Moderator ]
================================================================ -
Shit man... Part 14 was only created at the start of this year... So FAST????.. Now i am gona warn all those that want to quarrel about the redeployments dont quarrel here and those who wan Citaros and whateva shit buses deployed on that service get lost. Especially SMB 228X! I may wan to create a seperate thread for the arguments of deployments. Mods hope you can approve my request.
-
Originally posted by SBS2656X:
Come on! It's already 1911 posts on part 14!
CONTINUE IT HERE!
Hoping to see some WEG perming 161 gradually like 87.One does not simply open a new thread citing a new month without relevant info/<2000 posts.
-
Originally posted by TIB1105H:
Shit man... Part 14 was only created at the start of this year... So FAST????.. Now i am gona warn all those that want to quarrel about the redeployments dont quarrel here and those who wan Citaros and whateva shit buses deployed on that service get lost. Especially SMB 228X! I may wan to create a seperate thread for the arguments of deployments. Mods hope you can approve my request.
Post removed.
-
Originally posted by TownLink 291:
One does not simply open a new thread citing a new month without relevant info/<2000 posts.
Actually exceeding 75 pages is already enough to create a new thread.
There are many threads that are locked when it is just 75 pages. -
Originally posted by SBS2656X:
We already have one :D
http://sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/449632
But you will need to make (Part 2) for that.No, my meaning is to create a thread titled as Redeployment Arguments or debate something like that. like for example i may have posted a redeployment which is wrong, they can debate in that thread to confirm if it is wrong or wright.
-
Originally posted by TIB1105H:
No, my meaning is to create a thread titled as Redeployment Arguments or debate something like that. like for example i may have posted a redeployment which is wrong, they can debate in that thread to confirm if it is wrong or wright.
Post removed.
-
Originally posted by TownLink 291:
One does not simply open a new thread citing a new month without relevant info/<2000 posts.
He did not post a redeployment post (or redeployment doubts) in the first post.
As for your second part, sometime before someone said that even before reaching 2000 posts the system still lags, which means when it reaches 1950 posts or more a new thread can be started already.
-
Originally posted by SBS2656X:
We already have one :D
http://sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/449632
But you will need to make (Part 2) for that.It's locked.
-
Originally posted by SBS2656X:
That will be formed in this forum :
http://sgforums.com/forums/1279/topics/444012
Suspected Redeployments
Is this thread even a place for arguments?
-
Moderators, please lock this thread immediately to prevent any argument.
-
Deployments are useless!!!!
-
Need confirm :
SBS815S
HGDEP SP or a/w Dereg???
SgWiki put part SP part a/w dereg -.-" -
Originally posted by SMB228X:
Deployments are useless!!!!
If deployments are to be useless, there will not be any buses coming out of depots.
And stop your arguements here. We need a clean environment for us to share and enjoy posts. -
SgWiki changes :
SBS3099Y
BBDEP SP BNDEP SP -
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
Is this thread even a place for arguments?
Not this thread. There is no SPECIFIC thread to argue about redeployments. But there is ONLY a thread to DOUBLE CONFIRM a redeployment or you doubt it.
For arguements, we need to create another thread in approval of the moderator because a argumentative thread usually gains posts very fast and makes the website laggy.
And there is no need to lock this thread since the other thread is going to exceed 1950 posts. -
Try again around 1,980?