So just what needs to be improved?
-
Originally posted by sbst191:
Withdraw 84,115,191,275,825,882 :) put 20 buses on 927
10 MANs 10 Citaros!!
-
Originally posted by sbst191:
Withdraw 84,115,191,275,825,882 :) put 20 buses on 927
Do you happen to be living at Lentor & Sembawang in particular...
Remove...
See how you face the residents along Sembawang Rd
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
518 ar...I guess they route to Pasir Ris is to ply the other part of Ave 7..
We dun have roadside terminals alrdy
Put wrights and citaros on 518! 40buses! Make 518 go from PSR int and use expressways to get to suntec! Cfm faster than MRT! Make freq 3 min!
-
Oh OK...
Gets it this 191 is dee diang alrdy.
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
Oh OK...
Gets it this 191 is dee diang alrdy.
Like our comments? Like us on Facebook!
Aiming for 777 likes!
-
Originally posted by SMB228X:
10 MANs 10 Citaros!!
Yes! Wrights too! Throw the kubs away'
-
Originally posted by sbst191:
Withdraw 84,115,191,275,825,882 :) put 20 buses on 927
If 82 can call at Serangoon, does 84 is needed in the first place?
131 and 275 frequency is different, so 275 cannot be withdrawn.
882 withdrawn then how to get to Sembawang Park? Walk?
825 should stay, the one to be withdrawn is 529. -
Originally posted by sbst191:
Yes! Wrights too! Throw the kubs away'
So you are just another clone!!! What the fuck do you need so many clones???!!!
-
115 only have 1 bus playing it due to low demand... Why dont they just withdraw it?
Whats more most of it's bus stop have other buses plying on it like 62 and 80.
They should do what they did to 116 too. Withdrawn and route covered up by 161 and 325.
They should just place 115 from Hougang to somewhere like Jurong via Buangkok Green. There lack direct services to Jurong area. Bukit Panjang can just transfer from 156 to 960... [ 960 or smth I forgot. ] 51 from Hougang Int just went the other way to Jurong... Areas North-East of Hougang lacks direct routes to region that are far like Western Singapore. -
Why so many clones in sgf? -.-'
-
dun need to reply anymore...
-
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
So you are just another clone!!! What the fuck do you need so many clones???!!!
To spread our passions of the hobby to the world :D
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
dun need to reply anymore...
Maybe you should stop creating threads :)
-
151 and 154 are amongst the crappiest services I've seen. They are always competing to see who can drive the slowest and the loser will be forced to take the student crowds.
On one fine day I still remember along PIE towards KRT, my 151 was forced to overtake the 154 who was going at bicyle speed. My bus overtook that fella at a cool 30KM/H
And guess who overtook my overloaded bus at King Albert Park?
151's riding experience leaves much to be desired. Erratic waiting time (anything from 10 seconds to 25 min at Terminal), erratic travel time (anything from 50 min to 1 hr 30 min off-peak depending on BC's mood), erratic scheduling (if any) and worse of all, there are BCs which I won't reveal, to be avoided at all cost (slow and dangerous driving). Not to mention this route seems to have a very high turn-over rate. I've already had 2 chances of watching newbies being guided throughout the journey (and nearly miss Stevens Rd exit).
In short, if you need some stress, 151 is the service for you.
-
Actually I DO NOT THINK 82 SHOULD BE AMENDED TO PLY PUNGGOL INT. BECAUSE THERE IS NO DIRECT LINK FROM HOUGANG SOUTH AND SERANGOON AREA TO PUNGGOL ROAD END. NOW WITH 84, MANY PEOPLE NEEEDED TROUBLE TO TRANSFER FROM 82 TO 84. NOW NOT MUCH PPL TAKE 82 LE. CAN JUST TAKE 62. 882 is the only service plying Sembawang End Park. Uncle, ppl also live there. If you remove it, people will complain to SMRT as other than Taxi and driving your own vehicle, there is no other ways of using PUBLIC TRANSPORT to get there. Pity those living there. I agree. Withdraw 84 and replace it with 82. I prefer the original route :)
-
I think 151's nonsense, I've managed to trace w/ something...
Can't reveal it here..
-
Originally posted by sbst191:
Maybe you should stop creating threads :)
Creating threads..So continue to read newspaper articles see so and so suggesting something tat goes well in books or even in Western countries, which does not work here?
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
I think 151's nonsense, I've managed to trace w/ something...
Can't reveal it here..
Give 151 50 wrights and citaros! Problem solved! No need to sniff for the speed and frequency of buses!
-
Originally posted by sbst191:
Give 151 50 wrights and citaros! Problem solved! No need to sniff for the speed and frequency of buses!
If you have nothing else better to say, please get lost.
-
Originally posted by sbst191:
Give 151 50 wrights and citaros! Problem solved! No need to sniff for the speed and frequency of buses!
You forgot 154 it has not a single Citaro!!
-
$1.1 billion.
replace all SD with Citaro. got balance not?
-
Originally posted by sinicker:
$1.1 billion.
replace all SD with Citaro. got balance not?Then add some Citaro Gs!!
-
$1.1bn, use it for ADD
Make full use of the money, it's taxpayers money after all..
The rest, tambah the BC's pay and fuel prices.
-
165 can xfer its DDs to 74. CCL has makan its load and AMK to HG route is duplicated by many services.
-
Originally posted by SMB228X:
You forgot 154 it has not a single Citaro!!
Right! 154 should have 50 citaros and wrights too! Since 151 and 154 are competing against each other!