Bus bunching reports
-
I know this may not be bunch up, but a few years back...
I was waiting for 98, but then 2 198 buses came, both Volvo Olympian 3-Axle Batch 2. What's more, the registeration numbers, were alongside each other! Epic win! Though I can't remember those registeration numbers...
-
Damn epic
svc 292 gt 3/4 buses and it also bunch
-
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
anyway i think that 113 needs more buses. Thats my mindset. I dont plan on fighting for 113 to get more buses again but it should get a fleet add earlier. SBST just dont have enough drivers.
You have your service 238 mindset and i have mine.
If you think 238 have a large demand, its from the INT right?
the INT got immediate 88 ppl go up the bus issit?
Go find for MP lor see they can help anot.
-
Originally posted by SBS9252G:
Go find for MP lor see they can help anot.
113's route is an opposition ward...
-
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
Damn epic. I waited for 113 at hg st 21 at around 6.50pm. I waited for about 20 min finally bus came, 2 113As, 1 113.
1st 113A full to the door, second 113A inside got some pax, 113 also got some pax inside, damn epic. I overheard an aunty saying ppl are going to complain.113 only got 7 buses.
113A is served by its own buses also…So epic. =.=
3 113 kubs at hougang st 11 is really a joke.Feedback here:-
http://www.sbstransit.com.sg/icfms/icfms_feedback.aspx
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
26 buses for a long route.So how you define how many buses?
170/ 170X got some 41 - 45 buses.. But 30 mins is spent on travelling from JB CIQ > Woodlands CIQ.
That's because many people drove between the two CIQs which can cause traffic jams sometimes.
-
Originally posted by Bus&Soccer l0v3r (VO3x 1):
Damn epic
svc 292 gt 3/4 buses and it also bunch
If this is like this, doesn't this mean that most services bunch?
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Pls lock. As what ppl say when I creat the bunch up spotting, I swear this will only troll the page. LOCK THIS PLS. There are zero posts abt bunch up at all
That's right. If they keep going on to create part 2 or 3 or whatever, the adminstrator is to remove the thread forever!
-
Pls la. What era alrdy still say opp, PAP ward. The bus is a common user facility, dun tell me just because that place demand is not as high as other svs and is opp ward so make a big fuss out of it? Explain 53A & 53B!
-
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
If this is like this, doesn't this mean that most services bunch?
yes
-
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
That's because many people drove between the two CIQs which can cause traffic jams sometimes.
Comparing to the past the old CIQ, the jam is still moveable...In those days ar, big jam 170 dun bother to go into JB riao.. Walk into JB one.
But 30 mins means dunno how many SBS buses stucked inside the jam... 9 buses? lol
-
Actually, wouldn't it be more interesting to talk about recurrent bunches? Same buses, same time, same place everyday.
I know 2 gassies will always bunch up at TPY towards SGN on 105 at about 9-9.10am everyday, sometimes with a KUB with them. The buses usually have no more than 15 people on board altogether.
-
Originally posted by tvcnq:
Actually, wouldn't it be more interesting to talk about recurrent bunches? Same buses, same time, same place everyday.
I know 2 gassies will always bunch up at TPY towards SGN on 105 at about 9-9.10am everyday, sometimes with a KUB with them. The buses usually have no more than 15 people on board altogether.
Stop being an idiot. I DON'T CARE. If my thread is forced by ppl to lock, then it proves that the same kind of thread shld NOT exist. Mods I wish this thread to be locked immediately thx.
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Stop being an idiot. I DON'T CARE. If my thread is forced by ppl to lock, then it proves that the same kind of thread shld NOT exist. Mods I wish this thread to be locked immediately thx.
BUT THIS IS NOT YOUR THREAD!
-
Originally posted by SMB228X:
BUT THIS IS NOT YOUR THREAD!
AND THIS IS NOT WHERE YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE U FUCKING CLONE!!!
-
here we go again..
-
Originally posted by SMB228X:
BUT THIS IS NOT YOUR THREAD!
This is not your thread either!!!
-
Originally posted by SBS9067A:
I know this may not be bunch up, but a few years back...
I was waiting for 98, but then 2 198 buses came, both Volvo Olympian 3-Axle Batch 2. What's more, the registeration numbers, were alongside each other! Epic win! Though I can't remember those registeration numbers...
This looks like something that happened before...someone saw the wrong number bus two times.
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Stop being an idiot. I DON'T CARE. If my thread is forced by ppl to lock, then it proves that the same kind of thread shld NOT exist. Mods I wish this thread to be locked immediately thx.
-
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Pls lock. As what ppl say when I creat the bunch up spotting, I swear this will only troll the page. LOCK THIS PLS. There are zero posts abt bunch up at all
I posted about the 4 buses bunching together on svc 81 what..So thats not about bunching ah?? =.= -
Originally posted by SBS2601D:
waaaaa....my popcorn dio chaodah from the flames.
HOT!
-
Originally posted by SBS494J:
Trolls ...
#Foreverbitchingabout113. You complain that 113 with 7 buses and it's super lousy frequency is still understandable. But do you have to make a big fuss out of it? I'm sure there's a reason why is there 7 buses for 113.
You look at sv 238/269. Forever and always long quque. SD Fleet with crossover from different services and yet it's not enough to cater to the needs of the people. I give example, sv 238. As the only bus that serves LOR 8, and there is alot of people who lives at lor 8, of course they have to rely on 238. They would not want to take 232 to Lor 7 and walk since 232 takes a longer time to get them there, having it to serve those living at TPY lor 2/Lor 1 and Lor 6 people first. The first 3 stops of 238 calls has 235, which somehow helps to relive the load. but then the quque at TPY int, which i think you should really check out. Can stretch to Breadtalk by going one round if ALL buses are outside. If you were to notice TPY interchange, most of the buses parking at the Sawtooth berths mostly belong to 238, with only 2-3 belonging to 232/235 respectively and 2 for 231(W/G). Don't include 157 cause they have their own space to park their buses. That's partly why 163/73 has to loop at TPY interchange. On the other hand, your sv 113 the only reason why alot of people board is due to the long waiting time. If you want buses coming in at 5 mins per bus, it will be underutilized. Might as well have sibei slow frequency and pick up alot of people instead of having alot of buses and picking up little people.
In fact , you should not compare 238 with 113. The scenarios are totally different IMO.
-
Originally posted by tvcnq:
Actually, wouldn't it be more interesting to talk about recurrent bunches? Same buses, same time, same place everyday.
I know 2 gassies will always bunch up at TPY towards SGN on 105 at about 9-9.10am everyday, sometimes with a KUB with them. The buses usually have no more than 15 people on board altogether.
No no.
Its far more interesting to see who will win the "battle of who started this thread first:.
-
Originally posted by Bus Stopping:
I dont stay near hougang, neither have i taken 113 before, but at times like this you need to be slightly more understanding as the situation is not as bad yet. All that's needed to disrupt the frequency is a piw boarding and alighting, or a bc that's very "Safety First", or just a unlucky chain of red lights.
Just 1 bus is full is nothing compared to some yishun feeder services before being converted to semi bendy fleet. Those days, you could have 2 to 3 sd driving pass you with full-to-the-door load, or 3 buses bunched together (sometimes even 4).
Now, theres have access to sbst iris to gauge arrival times, and instead of taking 113, there's also loads of other services that can bring u to ur destination with just a short walk.
You are already very privileged compared to ppl taking buses a decade ago, so please keep your rants to urself unless this happens frequently. I know that you dont like to wait very long for ur bus, but do remember, the bc also dosent want their breaks to be eaten up.
-
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
That's because many people drove between the two CIQs which can cause traffic jams sometimes.
Aiseh man!!If only u hadnt told me this,i wouldnt even have realised it in my whole life!!