Sorry... after 34's citaro cameo, I hv to start this oso...
WHY THOSE SVC IN NEED GETS THE FUCKING TRASH WHILE THOSE VERY RICH GETS THE NICE ONES??!! 8629 SHOULDN'THV WENT TO 34 IN THE FIRST PLACE AT ALL!!!!! 156 SHOULD NOT GET 163'S TREATS BUT GET CITAROS INSTEAD!!!
163 IS GETTING WORSE BY THE DAYS!!! PLS REPLY YR VIEWS!
ur caps lock spoil ah..
YAH YAH 163 SHOULD GET SUPER NEW BUS ONE! WAH LAO EH!
SHOULD GET NEW CITARO! 6000 series don't want! quite old liao! should get 6100+ ones!!!!!
pls reply your views!!!!
iginally posted by SMB128B:Sorry... after 34's citaro cameo, I hv to start this oso...
WHY THOSE SVC IN NEED GETS THE FUCKING TRASH WHILE THOSE VERY RICH GETS THE NICE ONES??!! 8629 SHOULDN'THV WENT TO 34 IN THE FIRST PLACE AT ALL!!!!! 156 SHOULD NOT GET 163'S TREATS BUT GET CITAROS INSTEAD!!!
163 IS GETTING WORSE BY THE DAYS!!! PLS REPLY YR VIEWS!
Originally posted by SBS8032G:
I juz need ppl to uphold justice, tat's all...
coz SBS simply ignored my countless complaints...
I think your countless complaints to SBST must be all in caps which is why they refused to reply to you..
Originally posted by SMB128B:
I juz need ppl to uphold justice, tat's all...coz SBS simply ignored my countless complaints...
Do u actually have a life? If no, go get one.
Originally posted by nfshp253:It’s quite obvious that SBST wants their airport services to have more Citaro. Maybe 27 and 36 will get theirs next.
36 prolly not, look at the looping distance and the amount of break time, if any, when it returns to CGA. If Citaros go there, we would have "SBST's Chariots of Fire" next.
Originally posted by sinicker:YAH YAH 163 SHOULD GET SUPER NEW BUS ONE! WAH LAO EH!
SHOULD GET NEW CITARO! 6000 series don't want! quite old liao! should get 6100+ ones!!!!!
pls reply your views!!!!
I did not take 163 frequently. What the heck should I care whether it should get Citaros?
Originally posted by jgho83:Do u actually have a life? If no, go get one.
If he wants to get people to uphold justice, he should uphold justice himself first.
Originally posted by jgho83:Do u actually have a life? If no, go get one.
Nice one.
Originally posted by SMB128B:Sorry... after 34's citaro cameo, I hv to start this oso...
WHY THOSE SVC IN NEED GETS THE FUCKING TRASH WHILE THOSE VERY RICH GETS THE NICE ONES??!! 8629 SHOULDN'THV WENT TO 34 IN THE FIRST PLACE AT ALL!!!!! 156 SHOULD NOT GET 163'S TREATS BUT GET CITAROS INSTEAD!!!
163 IS GETTING WORSE BY THE DAYS!!! PLS REPLY YR VIEWS!
haiyah.. see my 240.. 243 got CNG, why 240 dont have, 334 got sunlong, why 240 dont have, 174 go volvo B7rle, why 240 havent get it.. not 240 get a chance cameo haiya.. Citaro why 334 and 335 get it perm citaro while 240 still dont have it.. relax la brader.. it need time to redeployment maa..
Get a life.. M1- One life, live it.
fck lar
Svc 34 should get back MK2/MK3 lar
Originally posted by EW26 Lakeside:haiyah.. see my 240.. 243 got CNG, why 240 dont have, 334 got sunlong, why 240 dont have, 174 go volvo B7rle, why 240 havent get it.. not 240 get a chance cameo haiya.. Citaro why 334 and 335 get it perm citaro while 240 still dont have it.. relax la brader.. it need time to redeployment maa..
Get a life.. M1- One life, live it.
It looks like this place had become an argument thread about which services should get Citaros first. Some of the fans here wanted SBS Transit to have Citaros, and their wish is granted, but they are insatiable when SBS Transit did not make the Citaros perm the services which they want Citaro perm on it. May I ask, what is the purpose of SBS Transit purchasing the 300 Citaros for? If everyone keeps fighting around for the Citaro perm, then SBS Transit shouldn't have purchased the Citaros in the first place, maybe SBS Transit should have purchased 300 of other models, like MAN NL323F (Sorry if I'm saying this as though SBS Transit is competing with SMRT's 201 MAN NL323F).
Originally posted by EW26 Lakeside:haiyah.. see my 240.. 243 got CNG, why 240 dont have, 334 got sunlong, why 240 dont have, 174 go volvo B7rle, why 240 havent get it.. not 240 get a chance cameo haiya.. Citaro why 334 and 335 get it perm citaro while 240 still dont have it.. relax la brader.. it need time to redeployment maa..
Get a life.. M1- One life, live it.
talk about 240... today SBS6064C cameo 138, but arrived into AMK showing sv240 route details... (before that even got 133A come out...)
Originally posted by Bus&Soccer l0v3r (VO3x 1):fck lar
Svc 34 should get back MK2/MK3 lar
Haha!! If get back the MK4s also i dont mind,i sure more than happy!!
Originally posted by Bus&Soccer l0v3r (VO3x 1):fck lar
Svc 34 should get back MK2/MK3 lar
Originally posted by QX179R:I think your countless complaints to SBST must be all in caps which is why they refused to reply to you..
Haha well said!!
Originally posted by Gus.chong:It looks like this place had become an argument thread about which services should get Citaros first. Some of the fans here wanted SBS Transit to have Citaros, and their wish is granted, but they are insatiable when SBS Transit did not make the Citaros perm the services which they want Citaro perm on it. May I ask, what is the purpose of SBS Transit purchasing the 300 Citaros for? If everyone keeps fighting around for the Citaro perm, then SBS Transit shouldn't have purchased the Citaros in the first place, maybe SBS Transit should have purchased 300 of other models, like MAN NL323F (Sorry if I'm saying this as though SBS Transit is competing with SMRT's 201 MAN NL323F).
yes.. that the point brader.. like i say.. it need time to redeployment right?? one day the service will get the new bus .. correct or not brader?
see 1 of them saw EDS showed route 240.. confirm one day 240 get it.. be patient..
I strongly agree with the thread starter.
Personally I feel that 163 is really a need for more new buses. I still remember 2 years back when 163 had 2/3 of new K230UBS in its fleet, furthermore full fleet K230UBs would appear on weekends. I enjoyed the fleet back then.
But what happen nowdays?? Just because 163 is NOT declared WAB, HGDEP somehow mistreated this service and downgrade back to those creepy MK3s.
Now with HGDEP taking in mass Citaros, I hope 163 will make a comeback to upgrade its fleet back. Why can't 163 get Citaros, instead of spamming around only on 101 and 109?? Is very unfair!
Originally posted by Merczrox:
Haha!! If get back the MK4s also i dont mind,i sure more than happy!!
Originally posted by EW26 Lakeside:yes.. that the point brader.. like i say.. it need time to redeployment right?? one day the service will get the new bus .. correct or not brader?
It's not up to me to decide whether services will get the new bus (and hey, I don't even know which bus are you talking about). Maybe you should lodge a complaint to SBS Transit since your keyboard is fine, like what QX179R had said that SBS Transit did not reply SMB128B's multiple complaints is likely because of overusage of caps locks in typing reports to SBS Transit. And don't try to be funny with me by calling me 'brader'. If you want, when some other fans do things like what I typed in my quote, you may call them that, but wait until you call yourself that first.
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:I strongly agree with the thread starter.
Personally I feel that 163 is really a need for more new buses. I still remember 2 years back when 163 had 2/3 of new K230UBS in its fleet, furthermore full fleet K230UBs would appear on weekends. I enjoyed the fleet back then.
But what happen nowdays?? Just because 163 is NOT declared WAB, HGDEP somehow mistreated this service and downgrade back to those creepy MK3s.
Now with HGDEP taking in mass Citaros, I hope 163 will make a comeback to upgrade its fleet back. Why can't 163 get Citaros, instead of spamming around only on 101 and 109?? Is very unfair!
I can accept the reason why 109 have Citaro perms.
Originally posted by Bus&Soccer l0v3r (VO3x 1):fck lar
Svc 34 should get back MK2/MK3 lar
Right. I think when he rides on the service with those extremely 'slow and old' buses he will definitely be typing in more complaints with caps.