315 for citaros? 315 for kub? or 317 for more kubs? discuss here please.
you shld post this in the "guess the next/last WAB" Thread. u will know why after seeing that thread.
156 more KUB/Citaro, 315 citaro and 317 more KUB FROM AMDEP.
138 so fast??? O_O
Originally posted by SMB128B:
138 so fast??? O_O
138 no choice, it goes to a tourist attraction. Furthermore 194 that goes to Jurong Bird Park already declared WAB, so 138 got to follow suit.
Remember there was a PRC dispute case in Jan 2010 over a PIW not able to board 138 due to a non WAB service, somemore that time 138 still using those 0405s.
The PRC dispute is at Mandai Rd right?
It may not even be PIW able bus stop
Originally posted by SBS5013G:315 for citaros? 315 for kub? or 317 for more kubs? discuss here please.
Perhaps like svc 39
Both KUBs And citaros spotted on Sv 315 today..
I think now that 156 is WAB, only SBS887J,SBS2632P,SBS1938J and SBS2743C shld remain. the rest shld go to 159/372/SP.
Originally posted by SMB128B:I think now that 156 is WAB, only SBS887J,SBS2632P,SBS1938J and SBS2743C shld remain. the rest shld go to 159/372/SP.
SBS887J is adless so it should be out.
SBS926E, SBS1938P, SBS1952Y, SBS1981M, SBS1997T, SBS2631S, SBS2632P, SBS2660H, SBS2668L and SBS2743C have to stay due to adverts.
But apparently 156 WAB failed today, with only 9 of 20 buses operating being WAB.
Originally posted by SBS7557R:SBS887J is adless so it should be out.
SBS926E, SBS1938P, SBS1952Y, SBS1981M, SBS1997T, SBS2631S, SBS2632P, SBS2660H, SBS2668L and SBS2743C have to stay due to adverts.But apparently 156 WAB failed today, with only 9 of 20 buses operating being WAB.
after the ads expire, the B10Ms except the four i mentioned shld go. 887 is quite good, at least at night... i like its bright lights instead of the other B10Ms which have very dim lights(*puke*).
first day mah... 151 first week oso less than 50% WAB, slowly 156 will be on track.
Originally posted by SBS7557R:SBS887J is adless so it should be out.
SBS926E, SBS1938P, SBS1952Y, SBS1981M, SBS1997T, SBS2631S, SBS2632P, SBS2660H, SBS2668L and SBS2743C have to stay due to adverts.But apparently 156 WAB failed today, with only 9 of 20 buses operating being WAB.
Based on service 156's ett wef today, 156 should have at least 10 WABs. And I believe that 3 of the non-WABs operate as AP or P shift... Which means HGDEP side should have replaced 1 MK4 with K230UB. Any confirmation of this?
Originally posted by SMB128B:
first day mah... 151 first week oso less than 50% WAB, slowly 156 will be on track.
151 on that very day had 5235H and 5237C replaced 850P and 1961X which fulfilled to exactly 50% WAB from HGDEP side. Dun forget that 151 also had 2 perm CDGE B9TLs too.
89xx, 6088 and 609x on 315, if I remember correctly. I have poor memory :)
iris still isn't reflecting these new services as WAB yet (at least for me)
sv19 has gotten wrights today. no confirmation perm or cameo.
Originally posted by SBS7557R:SBS887J is adless so it should be out.
SBS926E, SBS1938P, SBS1952Y, SBS1981M, SBS1997T, SBS2631S, SBS2632P, SBS2660H, SBS2668L and SBS2743C have to stay due to adverts.But apparently 156 WAB failed today, with only 9 of 20 buses operating being WAB.
sv156 is worse off than sv100 in terms of WAB quota
anyway, the deployer may do internal swop with other alr WAB-ed svcs (e.g. sv64), and swop 1 mk4 with ad over with a k.
Originally posted by SBS8675B:
151 on that very day had 5235H and 5237C replaced 850P and 1961X which fulfilled to exactly 50% WAB from HGDEP side. Dun forget that 151 also had 2 perm CDGE B9TLs too.
remember: on the very first two days, 5 KUBs in total had cameoed on 156, taking in buses from 105,163 etc. and quite a number of B10Ms was not seen on 156 that day.
Originally posted by SMB128B:
remember: on the very first two days, 5 KUBs in total had cameoed on 156, taking in buses from 105,163 etc. and quite a number of B10Ms was not seen on 156 that day.
Ps SBS2668L is adless
Sv133 really did not get any Wright or CDGE B9 at all. pathetic... Weekday (mon-thur), total 104 trip departure from AMK interchange, exactly 52 (50%) is NON-WAB slot..
saturday not much better... 109 trip departure from AMK Int, 50 are NON-WAB SLOT.... got slot of consecutive of 3 non-wab bus.. 2149 dep is WAB, then the next WAB Slot is 2231. Wow lagi worst than that service 113 which got 75% Wab fleet at least..
sunday is 38 non-wab trips out of 94 trips departure from AMK Int...
Sv154 is much better.. 31 non-wab slots out of 103 trips depart from Eunos int for weekday starting next week.... but think something wrong with the e-timetable. seem like they put too many WAB slots this week and they are going to revise it next week.. this week lagi better 23 non-wab slot out of 103 trips depart from Eunos int...
wonder why this time round SBST did not put more Wrights/CDGE on Sv88/133 and Wrights/KUB on Sv100/156 etc?
Originally posted by lemon1974:Sv133 really did not get any Wright or CDGE B9 at all. pathetic... Weekday (mon-thur), total 104 trip departure from AMK interchange, exactly 52 (50%) is NON-WAB slot..
Second that too. Couldn't believe the e-timetable when I saw Sv133 WAB timings, might as well let it remain un-WABed until AMDEP is more prepared to beef up its WAB fleet. Are the BCs not trained to operate Wrights yet? Hopefully they will revise the WAB capacity. Machiam worse than Sv64.
Originally posted by Simply.90:
Second that too. Couldn't believe the e-timetable when I saw Sv133 WAB timings, might as well let it remain un-WABed until AMDEP is more prepared to beef up its WAB fleet. Are the BCs not trained to operate Wrights yet? Hopefully they will revise the WAB capacity. Machiam worse than Sv64.
That is because Mark Chua did not constantly write in to corpcomms non-stop to demand for full Wright full Citaro fleet for these services except 109
Mark Chua would want to demand taking out all WAB buses from 88 because he thinks the passengers don't deserve any at all
Originally posted by lemon1974:Sv133 really did not get any Wright or CDGE B9 at all. pathetic... Weekday (mon-thur), total 104 trip departure from AMK interchange, exactly 52 (50%) is NON-WAB slot..
saturday not much better... 109 trip departure from AMK Int, 50 are NON-WAB SLOT.... got slot of consecutive of 3 non-wab bus.. 2149 dep is WAB, then the next WAB Slot is 2231. Wow lagi worst than that service 113 which got 75% Wab fleet at least..
sunday is 38 non-wab trips out of 94 trips departure from AMK Int...
Sv154 is much better.. 31 non-wab slots out of 103 trips depart from Eunos int for weekday starting next week.... but think something wrong with the e-timetable. seem like they put too many WAB slots this week and they are going to revise it next week.. this week lagi better 23 non-wab slot out of 103 trips depart from Eunos int...
wonder why this time round SBST did not put more Wrights/CDGE on Sv88/133 and Wrights/KUB on Sv100/156 etc?
why the f*** shld SBS deploy wrights/ CDGE on 88 when it's not even gonna be WAB for the next few yrs(TPY int)? in fact, you shld not mention wrights on 100/156 coz they dont even have them.
y'know what? since 88 is not WAB, i think SBS shld just donate most of the KUBs/CDGEs to other WAB-svc-in-need, and just stick back to its usual striders/VO3x fleet b4. after all, i'm sure SBS are still keeping the destos for 88 striders, right?
Originally posted by lemon1974:Sv133 really did not get any Wright or CDGE B9 at all. pathetic... Weekday (mon-thur), total 104 trip departure from AMK interchange, exactly 52 (50%) is NON-WAB slot..
saturday not much better... 109 trip departure from AMK Int, 50 are NON-WAB SLOT.... got slot of consecutive of 3 non-wab bus.. 2149 dep is WAB, then the next WAB Slot is 2231. Wow lagi worst than that service 113 which got 75% Wab fleet at least..
sunday is 38 non-wab trips out of 94 trips departure from AMK Int...
Sv154 is much better.. 31 non-wab slots out of 103 trips depart from Eunos int for weekday starting next week.... but think something wrong with the e-timetable. seem like they put too many WAB slots this week and they are going to revise it next week.. this week lagi better 23 non-wab slot out of 103 trips depart from Eunos int...
wonder why this time round SBST did not put more Wrights/CDGE on Sv88/133 and Wrights/KUB on Sv100/156 etc?
those svcs that went WAB on mon didn't get any new buses. deployment was still e same as before it went WAB.
Originally posted by SMB128B:
y'know what? since 88 is not WAB, i think SBS shld just donate most of the KUBs/CDGEs to other WAB-svc-in-need, and just stick back to its usual striders/LO3x fleet b4. after all, i'm sure SBS are still keeping the destos for 88 striders, right?
Should send the CDGE B9TLs from both services 25/88 over to 133.
As for 156, hope SLBP can transfer some former 52's K230UBs over to HGDEP.
Originally posted by AEW5001:those svcs that went WAB on mon didn't get any new buses. deployment was still e same as before it went WAB.
AMDEP in fact got plenty of spare K230UBs to make 133 full WAB after the Citaro intakes. But what 133 needs is DDs so it's just too bad lor...