Originally posted by TIB770T:Are the old buses horrible to ride on in the first place....
Half. i like the MKIII on 112. the ride throughout was god, i the afternoon, the deserted MKIII on 112 was pretty good to ride on!
BUT not on 163/156/80/43/119/113/109. they are shit there!
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Half. i like the MKIII on 112. the ride throughout was god, i the afternoon, the deserted MKIII on 112 was pretty good to ride on!BUT not on 163/156/80/43/119/113/109. they are shit there!
You can just write in to SBST instead of making a mockery of yourself here.....
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
Seriously! u see sengkang, really no space for 2 bendies. 1 will do, i'd rather 965 goes from woodlands to sengkang loop, so that bendies will come in handy =D
it's oredi loop, WRI to SKI, and the bus don't stop at SKI, it DIRECTLY go to the 965 berth to go back to woodlands.
Originally posted by TIB770T:You can just write in to SBST instead of making a mockery of yourself here.....
haiz, HOW MANY TIMES I MUST REPEAT? I wrote oredi, no help. they never tell me specifically why 163 is not declared WAB till now, whereas 86 is. sorry.
Originally posted by SMB128B:
it's oredi loop, WRI to SKI, and the bus don't stop at SKI, it DIRECTLY go to the 965 berth to go back to woodlands.
Originally posted by TIB770T:Are the old buses horrible to ride on in the first place....
They are horrible because Mark said so. Except the Mk 4 DM3500 of course, which he said are the Buses' version of the BMW
Originally posted by SMB128B:
haiz, HOW MANY TIMES I MUST REPEAT? I wrote oredi, no help. they never tell me specifically why 163 is not declared WAB till now, whereas 86 is. sorry.
Which means they have yet to check whether 163 is WAB ready anot, in terms of road conditions etc.
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Half. i like the MKIII on 112. the ride throughout was god, i the afternoon, the deserted MKIII on 112 was pretty good to ride on!BUT not on 163/156/80/43/119/113/109. they are shit there!
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
why shit? too crowded?
very crappy. MKIII acts as shit on those wif KUB.
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
sometimes, they park there, drivers are also humans ya know:)
hmmm... then SMRT can assign BCs who can hold until WRI to drive the bendies then.
Originally posted by SMB128B:
haiz, HOW MANY TIMES I MUST REPEAT? I wrote oredi, no help. they never tell me specifically why 163 is not declared WAB till now, whereas 86 is. sorry.
There is always the LRT which is wheelchair-friendly to serve PIWs in Sengkang.
Originally posted by SMB128B:
hmmm... then SMRT can assign BCs who can hold until WRI to drive the bendies then.
Just an extra note, the bendy cameos on 965 where because of the 965/960 x-over.
Originally posted by SBS7557R:There is always the LRT which is wheelchair-friendly to serve PIWs in Sengkang.
TRANSFER!!!THAT'S WHY IT'S TROUBLESOME FOR HER TO GO TPY(THREE transfers in total)!!! TRANSFER TRANSFER TRANSFER!!!
Sorry...
Originally posted by SBS7557R:There is always the LRT which is wheelchair-friendly to serve PIWs in Sengkang.
it is difficult for SBST/SMRT to please everyone.... declared WAB liao (such as Sv113) also complain.. never declare as WAB (such as Sv163) also complain.....
Originally posted by lemon1974:it is difficult for SBST/SMRT to please everyone.... declared WAB liao (such as Sv113) also complain.. never declare as WAB (such as Sv163) also complain.....
i'm more concerned abt the ones not declared.
Originally posted by SMB128B:
TRANSFER!!!THAT'S WHY IT'S TROUBLESOME FOR HER TO GO TPY(THREE transfers in total)!!! TRANSFER TRANSFER TRANSFER!!!Sorry...
no choice.. SBST cant please everyone... Why dun you ask SBST to provide one service from your place to Boon Lay, one service to Bukit Batok, one service to CCK, one service to Shenton way, one service to Orchard, one service to Harbourfront and so on and so for? Definitely there is a need to transfer...
Originally posted by lemon1974:no choice.. SBST cant please everyone... Why dun you ask SBST to provide one service from your place to Boon Lay, one service to Bukit Batok, one service to CCK, one service to Shenton way, one service to Orchard, one service to Harbourfront and so on and so for? Definitely there is a need to transfer...
not as much ma, waste of manpower in MRT, if got no choice then must stick with it, but this one leh, direct to TPY 163 at her doorstep, but must go to LRT station located 7 blocks away and transfer THREE times. wah liao eh.
Originally posted by lemon1974:it is difficult for SBST/SMRT to please everyone.... declared WAB liao (such as Sv113) also complain.. never declare as WAB (such as Sv163) also complain.....
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
113 was declared wab, because kubs got more standee area, bigger in size, and elderlys / piws living there, however SBST xferred one of the perm kubs in exchange for a mklll
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
that explains why some kubs on 113,43,163 were introduced, but 163 isnt declared wab, heard tht the fernvale area very hard to become wab.
But it's new area, i tot shld improve? pity fernvale residents, they are poorer than woodlands/sembawang residents... then now SBS has the right to take away buses again.
Originally posted by SMB128B:
But it's new area, i tot shld improve? pity fernvale residents, they are poorer than woodlands/sembawang residents... then now SBS has the right to take away buses again.
Sembawang has only 1 WAB bus and you say they are better than Fernvale residents?
Originally posted by SBS7557R:Sembawang has only 1 WAB bus and you say they are better than Fernvale residents?
Originally posted by SBS7557R:Sembawang has only 1 WAB bus and you say they are better than Fernvale residents?
at least sembawang got direct MRT.
Originally posted by SMB128B:
at least sembawang got direct MRT.
Hougang also got direct MRT
Originally posted by TIB770T:Hougang also got direct MRT
fyi, i only compare fernvale, although sembawang, hougang and sengkang all needed new buses.