Services 82 and 113

• SBS5010P

  27 Aug 11, 19:30

  Service 82 might get a cut in the fleet, maybe to 8-9 buses, the bus that is crossing over from service 82 to service 11 might be replaced with some random mk 3 or some mk 4, instead of making the frequencies longer. Right now, i believe that commuters will now depend on svc 113 more to the swimming complex, ave 2, hg mall after the new introduction of route change of service 82.
• iveco

  1 Sep 11, 11:59

  I think 82 should be withdrawn and replaced by 107 up to PGL Int. New route 84 exists to cover the rest.

• SBS2601D

  1 Sep 11, 12:02

  They shld just let 82 start from HG Int so that it can serve Sengkang and Punggol as well like now.....but then the buggers on top screwed themselves by building shrinking interchanges. HG as no space.

• iveco

  1 Sep 11, 12:04

  Originally posted by SBS2601D:

  They shld just let 82 start from HG Int so that it can serve Sengkang and Punggol as well like now.....but then the buggers on top screwed themselves by building shrinking interchanges. HG as no space.

  Hence my idea is way better.

• sbst275

  1 Sep 11, 12:58

  I dun think they should extend 107 either.

  It's like there's no point serving Sengkang

• jayh272416

  1 Sep 11, 23:43

  of course we all know that 82 should be extended to Toa Payoh Int via Boundary Rd and Serangoon Ave 3. unfortunately that's not going to happen.

• sbst275

  1 Sep 11, 23:55

  Originally posted by jayh272416:

  of course we all know that 82 should be extended to Toa Payoh Int via Boundary Rd and Serangoon Ave 3. unfortunately that's not going to happen.

  
  There's no pt either

  Wait a sec....

• jayh272416

  2 Sep 11, 00:48

  Originally posted by sbst275:

  
  There's no pt either

  Wait a sec....

  it's called 105.

• sbst275

  3 Sep 11, 08:37

  Originally posted by jayh272416:

  it's called 105.

  
  not 105 issue...

  

• SBS 1000U

  4 Sep 11, 22:44

  I think 82 should be extended to an interchange in the west to provide a direct link from west to Punggol instead.

• SBS5013G

  6 Sep 11, 13:25

  zzzzzz... 82 extend for what.. current route is less "ma fan"

• SMB128B

  6 Sep 11, 14:07

  Originally posted by SBS 1000U:

  I think 82 should be extended to an interchange in the west to provide a direct link from west to Punggol instead.

  
  from serangoon to JE perhaps

• SBS8155K

  6 Sep 11, 21:09

  Originally posted by SMB128B:

  
  from serangoon to JE perhaps

  
  That is 105.
• service_238

  6 Sep 11, 21:43

  Originally posted by SBS 1000U:

  I think 82 should be extended to an interchange in the west to provide a direct link from west to Punggol instead.

  trust me close to zero commuters will travel from the west to punggol by bus. its like who would travel from Hougang Ave 3 to Pandan Gardens on 51?
  
• iveco

  7 Sep 11, 09:41

  Originally posted by SBS 1000U:

  I think 82 should be extended to an interchange in the west to provide a direct link from west to Punggol instead.

  
  Like how? Take over 153 route?

• SMB128B

  7 Sep 11, 12:00

  Originally posted by SBS8155K:

  
  That is 105.

  
  NO, I MEAN FROM SERANGOON STRETCH TO JE!!! But must bear in mind not to duplicate 105 though.