SBS9669M on 163. Finally there is DD on 163 after so many years!
Congratz
LOL
deleted
163 doesnt need DDs....what it needs is better frequency.
As with many services.
Of course there's probably other constraints such as number of BCs etc...in that sense, SBST is at least able to do smth about it.
Unlike SMRT.
Originally posted by fireice rox:SBS9669M on 163. Finally there is DD on 163 after so many years!
Very well. A Volvo Olympian doing 163.
but 83 always got issue w/ dispatch itself
never fail to arr on time at SKG
It good to see a DD on 163, i think that is sbs answer to the population increase in Fernvale area.
Got Photo? I want to see...
simple photo.
Thanks so much. I suppose runs full day?
Originally posted by ^tamago^:simple photo.
Nice. Perm???
Finally see a double decker on 163 after 20 over years...
Originally posted by service_238:A supp trip from 83 would sound just right.. get the split shift fella to run 83A to sengkang, or off service from punggol to sengkang and do 163 1 round trip before going off service.
Its the only service I can think of that is able to spare 1 bus in the area.. 27 is another option.. like that no need DD on 163...
Maybe deploy SBS997A???
Originally posted by CSS608:Thanks so much. I suppose runs full day?
Saw it on 15th june 8.50am at the junction at ST electronics as the bus was travelling towards TPY...
Originally posted by ^tamago^:simple photo.
Nice!!!
Originally posted by CSS608:Thanks so much. I suppose runs full day?
Heard it's perm 163 for split shift only.
Originally posted by TIB1086D:
Saw it on 15th june 8.50am at the junction at ST electronics as the bus was travelling towards TPY...
today it was at YCK road turning into upper thomson road (towards TPY) at around 9am...
Originally posted by SBS2601D:163 doesnt need DDs....what it needs is better frequency.
As with many services.
Of course there's probably other constraints such as number of BCs etc...in that sense, SBST is at least able to do smth about it.
Unlike SMRT.
their freq is a bit mixed..
Originally posted by service_238:A supp trip from 83 would sound just right.. get the split shift fella to run 83A to sengkang, or off service from punggol to sengkang and do 163 1 round trip before going off service.
Its the only service I can think of that is able to spare 1 bus in the area.. 27 is another option.. like that no need DD on 163...
27 ??? Don't have to think about it. Is all due to the airport terminal height ans space constraint
Originally posted by do|ph|n3 a.k.a Jam|3:
27 ??? Don't have to think about it. Is all due to the airport terminal height ans space constraint
What service_238 meant was crossover from 27, not 27 to get DD.
Cheers.
Originally posted by SBS2601D:163 doesnt need DDs....what it needs is better frequency.
As with many services.
Of course there's probably other constraints such as number of BCs etc...in that sense, SBST is at least able to do smth about it.
Unlike SMRT.
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
I totally agree. i'd rather SBST deploys the DDs to other services who needs it. one of the examples are Svc 113/Svc 113A
sure. DD for SV 113. frequency @ 30 - 40min?
But thing is can 113 cope even for ppl at St 21 & Ave 1, also if there's ppl who cannot board at 1st arrival?
Originally posted by sbst275:But thing is can 113 cope even for ppl at St 21 & Ave 1, also if there's ppl who cannot board at 1st arrival?
Originally posted by TIB1051D:sure. DD for SV 113. frequency @ 30 - 40min?
Originally posted by SBS5010P:
what you mean? can explain?
Can everyone manage to board at Kovan within the 1st bus arrival?
Then can ppl along the way board the bus?
If ppl can still board, then I'll put it this way, take a look at other routes like 52 or 154 at Sunset Way.. hardly can board in the morning