amendment of 18 sounds good!
I prefer 69 amended instead. 18 has potential to be extended westwards.
I prefer 18 to intergrate with service 225, 60 to intergrate with 35, 69 to intergrate with 26
Originally posted by TIB1010Y:I prefer 18 to intergrate with service 225, 60 to intergrate with 35, 69 to intergrate with 26
Hybird svs will unlikely appear aft DBTF
Originally posted by iveco:I prefer 69 amended instead. 18 has potential to be extended westwards.
69's main load of pax are the TP students
oh ya let 66 parallel to 228 route s well & 228M become 66M (loop at bedok reservoir rd)
Originally posted by TIB1010Y:oh ya let 66 parallel to 228 route s well & 228M become 66M (loop at bedok reservoir rd)
I alrdy said, w/ DBTF, hybird svs unlikely to appear again
well svc 18 parallel to 225 still within 73C range..
the rest of the intregration is trunk + trunk.. don think having DBTF issue? since its still within KM range
I think it may be better if 73 merged with 26 and extended to EUN instead. 69 is good in its current state.
Originally posted by iveco:I think it may be better if 73 merged with 26 and extended to EUN instead. 69 is good in its current state.
Bedok Temp Int Berth Allocations
Berth B1 - 26, 35, 229
Berth B2 - 32, 33, 225W
Berth B3 - 40, 225G, 228
Berth B4 - 14, 60, 222
Berth B5 - 7, 25, 30e
Berth B6 - 30, 66, 87
Berth B7 - 9, 196, 197
Berth B8 - 16, 38, 168
Berth B9 - 17, 69, 401
Berth B10 - 18, 854
B1 or B10 nearest to MRT? thanks in advance!
Originally posted by sinicker:B1 or B10 nearest to MRT? thanks in advance!
B1
it's an L shape
30e & 401 can share berth since both service don get to "meet up".
Originally posted by Scania:
Really, what drugs have you been on? Your ideas are unfeasible at best and pipe dreams to say it bluntly.
BDK-EUN section heavily duplicated not just by routes terminating in BDK itself, but also by 28 & 67 from TAM.
Originally posted by iveco:
BDK-EUN section heavily duplicated not just by routes terminating in BDK itself, but also by 28 & 67 from TAM.
and 2
and 24
but then again, so what.
Originally posted by SBS8533C:Bedok Temp Int Berth Allocations
Berth B1 - 26, 35, 229
Berth B2 - 32, 33, 225W
Berth B3 - 40, 225G, 228
Berth B4 - 14, 60, 222
Berth B5 - 7, 25, 30e
Berth B6 - 30, 66, 87
Berth B7 - 9, 196, 197
Berth B8 - 16, 38, 168
Berth B9 - 17, 69, 401
Berth B10 - 18, 854
Right. I had seen that the berths are up at the Bedok Temp Int. Saw some buses parking there.
so how's the temp int ?
Originally posted by azharjj:so how's the temp int ?
I went there yesterday and today. Quite spacious in my opinion, although the walk from Berth B1 all the way to B9 & 10 is quite long. And for those who are obsessive with taking down all the cameos, it's still possible to see all the buses parked in the new Interchange. Just that mostly now you'll be seeing the rear of the parked cameos now instead of their front before this.
hw abt 854? where does it park? how does the bendies park?
Originally posted by TIB1010Y:hw abt 854? where does it park? how does the bendies park?
from what i saw ydy, one of the bendy park at one of the parking lot tgt with SBST buses
Originally posted by bus555:from what i saw ydy, one of the bendy park at one of the parking lot tgt with SBST buses
IIRC, i don't think there were lots marked out for bendies in the first place. (I might be wrong). It's already quite a squeeze having all those 12m lots marked out for all the SBST services in the temp Int.
The temp int looks okay, just that the alighing berth is abit CMI.
Then again, the lots "reserved" for bendies turns out being used by S-shift buses parking at bdk int. So much for bendie lots.
Originally posted by SBS494J:The temp int looks okay, just that the alighing berth is abit CMI.
Then again, the lots "reserved" for bendies turns out being used by S-shift buses parking at bdk int. So much for bendie lots.
I think bendies takes up too much space in there, even in the old interchange.
Think those bendies should park along the side roads instead and go off for the next trip asap.