Bus svcs with long waiting time& irregular headway adherence
-
Sv 960 really gone case . ......
-
sometimes 170 is even more frequent than 178 or even 961 during some pm peak belt
-
985 lor
Overloaded DAFs on PIE
963, erratic and packed.
-
985 i can understand PIE super crap traffic flow,worse if there's an accident.For 960 no reason SMRT can let it happen everytime.Their tiicket inspectors should do more surveys during weekday peaks and Sundays rather than everytime chit chat at WRI,L1G and SBW.963 quite jialat nowadays.Peak period now average 8 mins with most SDs deployed.Their split bendy buses always deploy on wrong timing.Some PM bendy blocks start from 0625-0940 then afternoon 1650-1925.
Ever since HG take full charge of 161 its becoming more worse especially for Weekends,Once saw 2 SDs one after another during 2050-2100 hrs not to mention the long queue.Its better for AM to take minor control.168 no comments so far.Very good.
806 is improving but sometimes the bendy are under utilise..ditto for 800.171 dun even say need split bendy.188 also start playing cowboy ardy,Always jam packed.Wonder where all the bendy buses go during peaks?
-
985 I think is the timesheet...
geela at the Bendemeer & Jln Toa Payoh leg, never consider e loading
-
985 i always see they crawl at Bendemeer towards L1G..Even for AM side
-
58 is the worst. I checked iris once and got 37 minutes. Another time it was 29 minutes. WTF?
-
Svc 856 at night..worst for ppl if they are taking bus back home.
-
Originally posted by nfshp253:
58 is the worst. I checked iris once and got 37 minutes. Another time it was 29 minutes. WTF?
seems like off peak got a lot of taiji for this sv -
Sv 123?
-
iris data.
Sv 123, 20 mins a bus
170, 60 mins headways???
-
Seems there's issues w/ 66, 67, 123, 170
-
sv70 ~7am timing along YCK towards Shenton Way is getting worse lately. 1 DD bus schedule has been removed (9808D/ 9827Z). When the next bus comes, usually a Scania KUB, it gets packed and passengers down the road couldn't board. At times got to skip up to 3 buses. Sometimes 9808D/9827Z replaces the Scania but is still overcrowded. sv 43 also experiencing overcrowding problems.
-
Yio Chu Kang Rd corridor...
Seriously 70 should get more ADDs. It's still like only bus to Shenton Way which CCL can't dig
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
985 lor
Overloaded DAFs on PIE
963, erratic and packed.
if SMRT had bought some double deckers, such situations would have improved and avoided. -
Originally posted by SBS3688Y:
if SMRT had bought some double deckers, such situations would have improved and avoided.
Anak Bt, ADD no go zone..there's 1 low lying tree near to the left turning slip road to Jln Anak Bt itself from PIE (Jurong).
-
Another same old problem,SMRT deployment got too many Split shift liao..963 alone got more than 8 S blocks..They should do some revise.They forget old folks like to go out during off peak.854 weekdays schedule is perfect but need bendy buses more during weekends.
-
854 is good.
Reliable frequency.
Ok bendy-SD ratio.
-
Dunno why RWS8 need up to 10 buses for such a short route.188R,963R or even can make 855R not enough is it?RWS8 should let Sentosa buses operate..Excess buses can spread to KJ and WL.
-
So simple.
To raise productivity.
So simple also don't know??
-
Originally posted by sbst275:
iris data.
Sv 123, 20 mins a bus
170, 60 mins headways???
Got once I waited for almost 30 minutes for svc 123 in Bukit Merah Interchange.
-
RWS8.. Let me spot run time
Ard 32 mins run time, 8 mins break e most... 5 - 8 buses boleh riao leh considering during meal breaks....
-
Think weekend bus schedule should be up for review. But let's put it this way, my belief is that ends up it's e feeder & CBD svs tat will be affected.
The rest might be left alone.
-
Originally posted by SBS3688Y:
if SMRT had bought some double deckers, such situations would have improved and avoided.Double-deckers or bendies, It is not much of a difference, If you feel comfortable with something, would you change it? Common sense right?
Likewise even a service has 80% full day DDs and 20% SDs, If you are a bunch lot of complaining peeps, I believe there is always excuse to complain.
I can convert full of 67's fleet into bendies and people still find it redundant.
I can subsitute 106 starting full day rigids all into split, split bendies into full day starts and you people complain it's a waste of space.
960's 5 full day rigid convert into split, in exchange for the 5 split bendies, Leaving 1 full day rigid, You can still not be satisfied.
If 167 gets bendies, You people will still complain because there isn't much bendies.
Go ahead and think, I won't go further beyond this line.
You keep saying that if SMRT bought DDs it would've solved the problem. But have you ever thought of better ideas and restrictions it might imply?
-
960's off peak freq justfiy for bendies as buffer.
67 is more of the actual arrival, kns want to come, arr 2 together.
any case..
seems 170 still problematic... There's 1 moment swee swee, off peak or peak hrs has 170 plying regularly.