Originally posted by SBS9622Y:
Ya, just don't flight. make the topic a peaceful one......
Originally posted by Winson.W:Oh. I think you all got that wrong. At my very first purpose of making those route is like doing something like those kind of 'X' bus route that is popular in Hong Kong. But I think 'X' is not a very popular word to use, so I change to 'e'. It's concept is not equal to FFW.
You can go Wikipedia to find out more about those 'X' service and you will get what I mean...... But it seems that it's not quite working here......
Yes. I know they aren't Fast Forward.
Originally posted by Winson.W:Oh. I think you all got that wrong. At my very first purpose of making those route is like doing something like those kind of 'X' bus route that is popular in Hong Kong. But I think 'X' is not a very popular word to use, so I change to 'e'. It's concept is not equal to FFW.
You can go Wikipedia to find out more about those 'X' service and you will get what I mean...... But it seems that it's not quite working here......
You see, HK has something called superb bus demand and coverage. Over long distances, X services will be more popular. Housing estates are quite far away from the city district,notably those on western and northern New Territories, and buses have proved to be cheaper and more comfortable then the train. The demand in Singapore is much lower.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
Oh, shut up.
oh shut up. x 2
Originally posted by Glencsoh:oh shut up. x 2
Oh, shut down.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
Oh, shut down.
Oh , Shut Up X10000000000000000000
Originally posted by Gus.chong:It was duplicating part of the LRT.
Who 1 take crappy LRT?
Originally posted by Glencsoh:Oh , Shut Up X10000000000000000000
OH, SHUT DOWN!
Originally posted by Glencsoh:Who 1 take crappy LRT?
920 and 922 will do even if no one will take the LRT.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
920 and 922 will do even if no one will take the LRT.
You dont seem to understand how LRT works. Would you accept a 20 min frequency over a 5 min frequency?
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
OH, SHUT DOWN!
OH GET A LIFE MAN!
Originally posted by SBS9622Y:You dont seem to understand how LRT works. Would you accept a 20 min frequency over a 5 min frequency?
YES!
Originally posted by SBS9622Y:You dont seem to understand how LRT works. Would you accept a 20 min frequency over a 5 min frequency?
It's Glencsoh who don't understand how LRT works!
In summary of all routes we have seen so far:
>>>> Your House >>>>
^ *
^ *
^ *
<< Your Destination <<
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
It's Glencsoh who don't understand how LRT works!
Ya i stay far far from any LRT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by SBS9622Y:In summary of all routes we have seen so far:
>>>> Your House >>>>
^ *
^ *
^ *
<< Your Destination <<
Ya i guess so.
Originally posted by Glencsoh:Ya i saty far far from any LRT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And therfore,
>>>> Your House >>>>
^ *
^ *
^ *
<< Your Destination <<
is what you want eventually.
wait longer
Originally posted by SBS9622Y:And therfore,
>>>> Your House >>>>
^ *
^ *
^ *
<< Your Destination <<
is what you want eventually.
wait longer
................................................................
Originally posted by Winson.W:After Schoollink, RapidBus and DowntownLink, my 4th project: Service Express. Aim to make express route out of th long haul bus route. My first one......
2e: Changi Village Terminal <> New Bridge Rd
via:
Changi Village Rd
Loyang Ave
Loyang Way
Upp Changi Rd North
PIE> Bedok North Ave 3
New Upp Changi Rd (Bedok MRT)
Changi Rd
Geylang Rd
KPE> PIE> CTE
Havelock Rd
New Bridge Rd (Chinatown)
New Bridge Rd Terminal
If this is how you charge fares then demand will be very little. This is how 128 works while 570 doesnt
Originally posted by SBS9622Y:
Now I know..... Perhaps I misunderstand the meaning of those routes.
I live in Bedok, I had observe that people are still taking 35 instead of 570. You got a point.
570 is a failed attempt to steal buisness. Only time will tell.
Meanwhile you can expect to see it withdrawn by end-2011. June, with luck.
Originally posted by SBS9622Y:570 is a failed attempt to steal buisness. Only time will tell.
Meanwhile you can expect to see it withdrawn by end-2011. June, with luck.
Maybe it will be withdrawn in March like what 188A had done.
Originally posted by Gus.chong:Maybe it will be withdrawn in March like what 188A had done.
Maybe Feb
SV 267 Ang Mo Kio Int > St 54
VIA
Ang Mo Kio Ave 3
Ang Mo Kio Ave 6
Ang Mo Kio Ave 5
Ang Mo Kio St 53
Ang Mo Kio St 52
Ang Mo Kio St 54
Ang Mo Kio St 52
Ang Mo Kio St 53
Ang Mo Kio Ave 5
Ang Mo Kio Ave 6
Ang Mo Kio Ave 3
4-6 Mins
10 WAB Single Decks
5 WAB Double Decks
WAB Service
For people who is going home on rainy days at AMK Hub as the existing Townlink 265 need to walk an extra mile to board it and will get wet along the way. This service will be more convenient for people to take as it is in the interchange. This may cause Townlink 265 to be a loop service from Ang Mo Kio Bus Interchange to Ang Mo Kio Ave 9 (The loop inside Nayang Poly)
SVC 4 Pasir Ris-AMK
Pasir Ris Int
Pasir Ris Dr 3
Pasir Ris Dr 6
Pasir Ris Dr 1
Pasir Ris Dr 8
Tampines Ave 12
Tampines Ave 9
Tampines Ave 7
Tampines Ave 4
Tampines Ave 1
Tampines Ave 10
Bartley Rd East
Bartley Rd
Bishan Rd
Ang Mo Kio Ave 8
Ang Mo Kio int