Originally posted by Gus.chong:
What I mean was we want to board the MK3s before they were de-registered, but chances are low due to lay-up, not we want SBS Transit to organise farewell tour.
SBS Transit to organise mk3 farewell though is highly impossible.. why? years back there used to be mk2, merecedes cum dart tour... until in 2010 something cock up cause of someone complaining to another person tat have no choice until sbst has to ceased any farewell tour AND public chartered (except for sbst staffs)
Originally posted by 109/110:SBS Transit to organise mk3 farewell though is highly impossible.. why? years back there used to be mk2, merecedes cum dart tour... until in 2010 something cock up cause of someone complaining to another person tat have no choice until sbst has to ceased any farewell tour AND public chartered (except for sbst staffs)
Originally posted by Merczrox:
Yeah i seriously dont mind.I like the Citaros as well..They should be put in the svcs now which have lots of MK3s when they leave.Any svc get the Citaros also i dont care but only svcs 43 and 163 shouldnt get the Citaros at all!!
CAN'T U JUZ STOP FUCKING THAT POOR 163? LEAVE IT ALONE!
43 too, i noe too many gd buses from HGDEP are snatched from that svc, BUT IT'S STILL AN SBS SVC DUH! DESERVES RESPECT!
So pls stfu and stop making a din here. This time u started it ok?
Originally posted by 109/110:SBS Transit to organise mk3 farewell though is highly impossible.. why? years back there used to be mk2, merecedes cum dart tour... until in 2010 something cock up cause of someone complaining to another person tat have no choice until sbst has to ceased any farewell tour AND public chartered (except for sbst staffs)
That guy must really be an asshole!!!
To SMB128B Omg , u r the 1st one that i see to get so worked up becoz of this sentence
"163
shouldnt get the Citaros at all!!"
Seriously... he didnt flamed u nor start a flame..
and his post is so sarcastic , like that also u cant even see?
Haiz... so how can u even say he started it
Originally posted by Gus.chong:
What I mean was we want to board the MK3s before they were de-registered, but chances are low due to lay-up, not we want SBS Transit to organise farewell tour.
Quite a number are still on service...? 7XX series and 8XX series.
Originally posted by SMB128B:CAN'T U JUZ STOP FUCKING THAT POOR 163? LEAVE IT ALONE!
43 too, i noe too many gd buses from HGDEP are snatched from that svc, BUT IT'S STILL AN SBS SVC DUH! DESERVES RESPECT!
So pls stfu and stop making a din here. This time u started it ok?
Actually that post was meant to just irritate him for fun because of his stupid posts..I didnt really mean it again seriously and for anyone else also.This time it was really meant as a joke for him and not anybody else..Hope u get it ok??I alr have said that it was meant to be a joke and to just irritate him and not for real provocation.So u still get offended after this also then its not my pasal alr.
Originally posted by Bus&Soccer l0v3r (VO3x 1):To SMB128B
Omg , u r the 1st one that i see to get so worked up becoz of this sentence
"163 shouldnt get the Citaros at all!!"
Seriously... he didnt flamed u nor start a flame..
and his post is so sarcastic , like that also u cant even see?
Haiz... so how can u even say he started it
Nvm la..He couldnt sense the sarcasm in my post and realise that it was just a joke meant only for that stupid clone SMB228X.
Originally posted by Merczrox:
Nvm la..He couldnt sense the sarcasm in my post and realise that it was just a joke meant only for that stupid clone SMB228X.
we all knew except him
Originally posted by SMB228X:
WHO IS THAT FUCKING IDIOT WHO COMPLAINED???
Originally posted by Merczrox:
Nvm la..He couldnt sense the sarcasm in my post and realise that it was just a joke meant only for that stupid clone SMB228X.
Originally posted by SMB228X:SBS should scrap those creepy MK3s faster! Replace with Citaros ASAP!
Originally posted by ahlunjia:
Citaros is even worse than MK3.I think he should say 'SBS should scrap those creepy Citaros faster! Replace with MK3s ASAP!'
Suspect the March 2012 outgoing batch of MK3s (769S 772G 775Z 788L 801G) are now awaiting layup in HGDEP. Hardly seems to see them on the road this week. Furthermore service 43 just got 788L replaced.
Anyone happen to see any of these MK3s on the roads for the past 2-3 days?
also never see 810E on sv 112 this few days ! and this wk quite a few of STRIDER keep cameo on this sv @ the same time !
Originally posted by Lsk138:also never see 810E on sv 112 this few days ! and this wk quite a few of STRIDER keep cameo on this sv @ the same time !
Both SBS804Z and SBS806T still spotted on 163M this week. Sad case...
Think they will be the next batch of HGDEP MK3s to go off.
Originally posted by Lsk138:also never see 810E on sv 112 this few days ! and this wk quite a few of STRIDER keep cameo on this sv @ the same time !
With 2675R sticking to 112 lately
Originally posted by SBS7557R:With 2675R sticking to 112 lately
also seen 2658 1903 always cameo on 112 and today 2612 turn ! and now the last MK3 FROM this svc also become sp
Originally posted by Lsk138:also seen 2658 1903 always cameo on 112 and today 2612 turn !
Looks like 112 isn't that popular enough to get new buses.
Originally posted by SBS3057T:Looks like 112 isn't that popular enough to get new buses.
same to sv 85 and 159 !
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:Suspect the March 2012 outgoing batch of MK3s (769S 772G 775Z 788L 801G) are now awaiting layup in HGDEP. Hardly seems to see them on the road this week. Furthermore service 43 just got 788L replaced.
Anyone happen to see any of these MK3s on the roads for the past 2-3 days?
Who edited Sgwiki to remove the March 2012 batch of MK3's deployments (except SBS772G)?
Originally posted by SBS8676Z:Suspect the March 2012 outgoing batch of MK3s (769S 772G 775Z 788L 801G) are now awaiting layup in HGDEP. Hardly seems to see them on the road this week. Furthermore service 43 just got 788L replaced.
Anyone happen to see any of these MK3s on the roads for the past 2-3 days?
The MK3s you mentioned will not be laid-up but instead they were awaiting de-registration (except SBS772G, don't know why).
Originally posted by SBS3057T:Who edited Sgwiki to remove the March 2012 batch of MK3's deployments (except SBS772G)?
They were removed due to awaiting de-registration (except SBS772G).
Originally posted by SBS3057T:Who edited Sgwiki to remove the March 2012 batch of MK3's deployments (except SBS772G)?
I SUSPECT i saw 769G on 159 this morning...
Originally posted by SMB128B:I SUSPECT i saw 769G on 159 this morning...
SBS769S or SBS772G.